The Attitude to the Critical Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Habermas between Critical Theory and Liberalism
  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

Habermas is considered to be the most significant contemporary figure of critical theory, or rather of the second generation of the Frankfurt School. Here we will review the basics of the Frankfurt School and critical theory. Habermas developed his own view of the place of critical theory in the system of sciences, which will be presented here. We put a special emphasis on Habermas’s attitude toward critical theory, especially toward the most significant representatives of the first generation of the Frankfurt School. Here we will present Habermas’s opinion on significant aspects of the theoretical oeuvre of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, and Lukács. Habermas shows a high level of understanding and respect for the theoretical oeuvre of the mentioned theorists but also makes a critical distance toward them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abromeit, John (2011) Max Horkheimer and the Foundation of the Frankfurt School; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. Jeffrey (2014) The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anievas Alexander (2010) On Habermas, Marx and the critical theory tradition Theoretical mastery or drift?; Moore Cerwyn, Ferrands Chris (eds.); London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, Paul (1979) Young Lukács, Old Lukács, New Lukács; The Journal of Modern History. Vol. 51 No. 3; pp. 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Craig (2017) Habermas and Giddens on Praxis and Modernity: A Constructive Comparison; London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, Nocholas (1996) “Habermas Jürgen” In Biographical Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Philosophers; (Brown Stuart, Collinson Diane, Wilkinson Robert), London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirovic, Alex (2020) “Jürgen Habermas (1929–)” In Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, S. John (2006) “Critical Theory as a Research Program” In The Cambridge Companion to Habermas; White K. Stephen (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, Andrew (2006) Habermas: The Kew Concepts; London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, Andrey (2005) The Philosophy of Habermas; Montreal: McGill University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, Gordon James (2005) Habermas A Very Short Introduction; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian (2015) “Critical Theory” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication; Mazzoleni Gianpietro; New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fultner, Barbara (2011) “Introduction” In Jürgen Habermas: Key Concepts; Fultner Barbara (eds.), London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandesha, Samir (2004) Marcuse, Habermas and the Critique of Technology In Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader; Abromeit John, Cobb W. Mark (eds.), London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, Raymond (1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gralitz, Dustin, Zompetti, Joseph (2021) Critical theory as Post-Marxism: The Frankfurt School and beyond; Educational Philosophy and Theory, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1876669.

  • Grondin, Jean-Luc (1988) “Reification form Lukács to Habermas” In Lukács Today: Essays in Marxist Philosophy; Rockmore Tom (ed.); Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1993) “Remarks on the Development of Horkheimer’s Work” In On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives; Benhabib Seyla, Bonb Wolfgang, McCole John (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2; Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1986) Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol. 1.; Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1974) Habermas Talking: An Interview; Theory and Society, vol. 1, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1971) Тoward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics; Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, C. Robert (2013) Jürgen Habermas: Critic in Public Sphere; New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max, Adorno, Theodor (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments; Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Marin (1984) Marxism and Totality; Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas (2000) “Habermas, the Public Sphere, and the Democracy: A Critical Intervention” In Perspectives on Habermas; Hahn Edwin Lewis (ed.), Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langsdorf, Lenore (2000) “The Real Condition for the Possibility of Communicative Action” In Perspectives on Habermas; Hahn Edwin Lewis (ed.), Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, Georg (2000) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MakKendrich, G Kenneth (2008) Discourse, Desire, and Fantasy in Jurgen Habermas Critical Theory; New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert (1964) One-Dimensional Man; Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCharthy, Thomas (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas; Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1973) Adventures of the Dialectic; Evanston: Northwestern University Press. p. 30–59. ISBN 978-0-8101-0404-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meszaros, Istvan (1991) “History and Class Consciousness”. In The Dictionary of Marxist Thought; Bottomore, Tom; Harris, Laurence; Kiernan, V.G.; Miliband, Ralph (eds.); Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp. 241–242. ISBN 0-631-16481-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, William (2009) Habermas; Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozborne, Peter (1996) “Enlightenment,” in A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory; (Payne Michael ed,), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamler, E. Richard (2000) “Habermas versus Gadamer? Some Remarks” ” In Perspectives on Habermas; Hahn Edwin Lewis (ed.), Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pensky, Max (2011) “Historical and Intellectual Context” In Jürgen Habermas: Key Concepts; Fultner Barbara (eds.), London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Gustavo (2019) Imposed Rationality and Besieged Imagination: Practical Life and Social Pathologies; Cham: Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, Peter (2016) “A Project of Liberation or a Source of Reification” In Lifelogging: Digital Self-Tracking and Lifelogging – Between Disruptive Technology and Cultural Transformation; Selke Stefan (ed.).Cham: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sitton, F. John (2003) Habermas and Contemporary Society; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Specter, G. Matthew (2010) Habermas: An Intellectual Biography; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sudersan, P (1998) Habermas and Critical Social Theory; Indian Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. XXV, No. 2, pp. 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, Lasse (2010) Habermas: A Guide for a Perplexed; Chippenham: New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. Michael (2017) Introduction: What is Critical Theory In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory; Thompson J. Michael (ed.), Chum: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Nicholas (1999) “The Reorientation of Critical Theory: Habermas,” In The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy; (Glendinning Simon ed.), Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, Richard (2019) Lukács Phenomenology of Capitalism: Reification Revalued; Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharlamanov, K. (2024). The Attitude to the Critical Theory. In: Habermas between Critical Theory and Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53938-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53938-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53937-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53938-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation