Abstract
The EE Organisational Operation Theory or PSI theory is a theory about the operation of organisations. PSI stands for Performing in Social Interaction. Based on the CIAO Paradigm (Communication, Information, Action and Organisation), a communication-centric view is taken on the cooperation of people in enterprises, as manifested in business processes. The fundamental notion in understanding the operation of organisations is the coordination act. It consists of a performer, an addressee, an intention and a product. The performer and the addressee are actors, i.e. subjects filling an actor role. Actor roles are the units of authority and responsibility. Coordination acts can be performed verbally, non-verbally and tacitly. They are the key elements in (business) conversations, which are the constituting parts of (business) transactions. A transaction is carried out by actors in two roles: the initiator and the executor. The executor brings about the product of the transaction. The process of a transaction is a path, possibly including iterations, through a universal transaction pattern, which consists of one main pattern and six revocation patterns. The latter serve to revert the state in the main pattern to a previous state. Because of the inherent connection between an actor role and the transaction kind of which fillers are the executor, the combination of the two is called transactor role. Transactor roles are the universal building blocks of business processes. Performing a coordination act results in creating the corresponding coordination fact. A fundamental principle in the PSI theory is that actors act autonomously, also if they are guided by business rules. Based on this principle, definitions are developed for the notions of authority, responsibility, accountability and competence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research (Theory of management policy). Prentice-Hall International. xvi, 512 p.
Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy ontology II: A world of systems. In Treatise on basic philosophy 4. Reidel.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1986). The theory of communicative action. Polity Press.
Stamper, R. K. (1973). Information in business and administrative systems. Batsford. 6, 362 p.
Dietz, J. L. G. (2012). Red garden gnomes don’t exist. Sapio Enterprise Engineering.
Edmondson, W. J. (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis (Longman linguistics library) (p. 217). Longman.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation (Vol. 3: Speech Acts). Syntax and semantics. Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation (Vol. 9: Pragmatics). Syntax and Semantics. Academic Press.
Steuten, A. (1998). A contribution to the linguistic analysis of business conversations within the language/action perspective. Delft University of Technology.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Pub. Corp.. xiv, 207 p.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press. xiii, 241 p.
Reijswoud, V. E. (1996). The structure of business communication: Theory, model and application. Delft University of Technology.
Bunge, M. (1979). A world of systems. Ontology. Reidel. XVI, 314 S.
Bergson, H. (1913). Creative evolution. Macmillan. XV, 425 S.
Dietz, J. L. G., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (1991). Speech acts or communicative action? In Second European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer.
Terlouw, L. (2011). Modularization and specification of service-oriented systems. In Computer science. Delft University of Technology.
Dietz, J. L. G. (2009). On the nature of business rules. In Advances in enterprise engineering I. Springer.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge U.P.. vii, 203 p.
Hoogervorst, J. A. P. (2017). Foundations of enterprise governance and enterprise engineering (p. 574). Springer International Publishing.
Shook, J. (2010). How to change a culture: Lessons from NUMMI. Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 63–68.
Denning, P., & Medina-Mora, R. (1995). Completing the loops. Interfaces, 25(3), 15.
Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., & Flores, F. (1992). The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press.
Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). The deep structure of business processes. Communications of the ACM, 49(5).
Goldkuhl, G. (2006). Action and media in interorganizational interaction. Communications of the ACM, 49(5).
Checkland, P., & Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: A 30-year retrospective (2nd ed.). Wiley. A66, xiv, 330 p.
Sitter, L. U., Hertog, J. F., & Dankbaar, B. (1997). From complex organizations with simple jobs to simple organizations with complex jobs. Human Relations, 50(5), 497–536.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dietz, J.L.G., Mulder, H.B.F. (2024). The EE Organisational Operation Theory. In: Enterprise Ontology. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53361-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53361-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53360-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53361-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)