A Secure and Fair Federated Learning Protocol Under the Universal Composability Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
MultiMedia Modeling (MMM 2024)

Abstract

Federated learning is a paradigm of distributed machine learning that enables multiple participants to collaboratively train a global model while preserving data privacy and locality. However, federated learning faces the dual challenges of data privacy and model fairness. Balancing these requirements while achieving efficient and robust learning outcomes remains a pressing issue. In this paper, based on the Universal Composable framework, we introduce an ideal federated learning functionality \( F_{\text {FSFL}} \) and a fair and secure federated learning real-world protocol \( \pi _{FSFL} \). Our protocol integrates differential privacy and fairness incentive mechanisms, safeguarding client data privacy and countering potential threats from dishonest or malicious clients to model fairness. We demonstrate that our protocol can securely simulate the ideal functionality \( F_{\text {FSFL}} \) under the semi-honest model and resist passive attacks from polynomial-time adversaries. We further conduct a series of experiments on three widely used datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and FashionMNIST) to validate the efficacy and robustness of our protocol under varying noise levels and malicious client ratios. Experimental results reveal that compared to other federated learning protocols, our method ensures data privacy and model fairness while delivering performance on par with, if not better than, baseline protocols.

Supported by organizations the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62002080), Guizhou Province Science and Technology Plan Project for 2023 (Guizhou Province Science Foundation - General [2023] No. 440), Project for Improving the Quality of Universities in Municipalities and Provinces (Ministry Office Issued [2022] No. 10-32), Natural Science Research Project of Guizhou Provincial Department of Education (Guizhou Education Union KY [2020] No. 179, No. 180, [2021] No. 140), Major Special Project Plan of Science and Technology in Guizhou Province (20183001), School-level Project of Kaili University (2022YB08), and School-level Research Project of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (2020XYB02).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, S., Miskon, S.: IoT driven resiliency with artificial intelligence, machine learning and analytics for digital transformation. In: 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), pp. 1205–1208. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseinalipour, S., Brinton, C.G., Aggarwal, V., et al.: From federated to fog learning: distributed machine learning over heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58(12), 41–47 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Konečný, J., McMahan, H.B., Yu, F.X., et al.: Federated learning: strategies for improving communication efficiency. ar**v preprint ar**v:1610.05492 (2016)

  4. Li, T., Sanjabi, M., Beirami, A., et al.: Fair resource allocation in federated learning. ar**v preprint ar**v:1905.10497 (2019)

  5. Dorner, F.E., Konstantinov, N., Pashaliev, G., et al.: Incentivizing honesty among competitors in collaborative learning and optimization]. ar**v preprint ar**v:2305.16272 (2023)

  6. Ro, J., Chen, M., Mathews, R., et al.: Communication-efficient agnostic federated averaging (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2104.02748

  7. Ji, Y., Kou, Z., Zhong, X., et al.: Client selection and bandwidth allocation for federated learning: an online optimization perspective (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2205.04709

  8. Woo, G., Kim, H., Park, S., You, C., Park, H.: Fairness-based multi-AP coordination using federated learning in Wi-Fi 7. Sensors 22(24), 9776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, J., et al.: Multi-job intelligent scheduling with cross-device federated learning. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 34(2), 535–551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2022.3224941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arouj, A., Abdelmoniem, A.M.: Towards energy-aware federated learning on battery-powered clients. ar**v e-prints (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2208.04505

  11. Llasag Rosero, R., Silva, C., Ribeiro, B.: Forecasting functional time series using federated learning. In: Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Alonso, S., Jayne, C., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) EANN 2023. CCIS, vol. 1826, pp. 491–504. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34204-2_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim, W.Y.B., et al.: Federated learning in mobile edge networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 22(3), 2031–2063 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.2986024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lyu, L., Xu, X., Wang, Q., et al.: Collaborative fairness in federated learning, pp. 189–204. Privacy and Incentive, Federated Learning (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Du, W., Xu, D., Wu, X., et al.: Fairness-aware agnostic federated learning. Proceedings (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2010.05057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ezzeldin, Y.H., Yan, S., He, C., et al.: Fairfed: enabling group fairness in federated learning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 37. no. 6, pp. 7494–7502 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shejwalkar, V., Houmansadr, A.: Manipulating the byzantine: optimizing model poisoning attacks and defenses for federated learning. In: Proceedings 2021 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (2021). https://doi.org/10.14722/NDSS.2021.24498

  17. Javed, A.R., Hassan, M.A., Shahzad, F., et al.: Integration of blockchain technology and federated learning in vehicular (IoT) networks: a comprehensive survey. Sensors 22(12), 4394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, J., He, X., Sun, R., et al.: Privacy-preserving data sharing scheme with FL via MPC in financial permissioned blockchain. In: ICC 2021-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500868

  19. Zhao, J., et al.: Privacy-enhanced federated learning: a restrictively self-sampled and data-perturbed local differential privacy method. Electronics 11(23), 4007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11234007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao, X., Zhang, Z., Jia, J., et al.: Flcert: provably secure federated learning against poisoning attacks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 17, 3691–3705 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, Z., He, Y., Yu, H., et al.: Data heterogeneity-robust federated learning via group client selection in industrial IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 9(18), 17844–17857 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, W., Wang, X., Zhou, P., et al.: Client selection for federated learning with non-IID data in mobile edge computing. IEEE Access 9, 24462–24474 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, B., **ao, W., Wang, S., et al.: Tackling system and statistical heterogeneity for federated learning with adaptive client sampling. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2022-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1739–1748. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrag, M.A., Friha, O., Hamouda, D., et al.: Edge-IIoTset: a new comprehensive realistic cyber security dataset of IoT and IIoT applications for centralized and federated learning. IEEE Access 10, 40281–40306 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ur Rehman, M.H, Dirir, A.M., Salah, K., et al.: TrustFed: a framework for fair and trustworthy cross-device federated learning in IIoT. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 17(12), 8485–8494 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng, Z., Jiang, Y., Huang, X., et al.: Universal interactive verification framework for federated learning protocol. In: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Networks, Communication and Computing, pp. 108–113 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Quanxing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qiuxian, L., Quanxing, Z., Hongfa, D. (2024). A Secure and Fair Federated Learning Protocol Under the Universal Composability Framework. In: Rudinac, S., et al. MultiMedia Modeling. MMM 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53305-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53305-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53304-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53305-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation