Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
William Blake's Visions

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this book is to identify the underlying physiologies of what the British poet, painter and printmaker William Blake (1757–1827), called his ‘visions.’ In doing so, I have taken the apparently novel step of assuming that when he wrote that the paintings shown in his small exhibition off Oxford Street in 1809 were derived from things ‘seen in my visions,’ he meant it (E 531). It is now possible to demonstrate that the perceptual phenomenology of his ‘visions’ are capable of being identified and assigned with a physiological basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For introductions to Blake’s life and art, see Robert N. Essick, ‘Blake, William (1757–1827),’ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Oct 2005 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/2585, accessed 21 Aug 2017]; G. E. Bentley, Jr., The Stranger from Paradise: A Biography of William Blake (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001); Robin Hamlyn, ‘William Blake at Work: “Every thing which is in Harmony,”’ Joyce H. Townsend and Robin Hamlyn (eds.) William Blake: The Painter at Work (London: Tate Publishing, 2003) pp. 12–39.

  2. 2.

    On account of the multiple modalities of Blake’s hallucinations and synaesthesia, they may still be best covered by the portmanteau term ‘visions,’ the word he used himself.

  3. 3.

    For a wide-ranging review of how the term ‘phenomenology’ might be included in hallucinations research, see Sam Wilkinson, Huw Green, Stephanie Hare, Joseph Houlders, Clara Humpston & Benjamin Alderson-Day, Thinking about hallucinations: why philosophy matters, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 27 (2022), 219–235.

  4. 4.

    BR(2): 437. On Crabb Robinson, see Newey, Vincent. “Robinson, Henry Crabb (1775–1867), diarist and journalist.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 28. Oxford University Press. Accessed 30 Dec 2022.

  5. 5.

    A hypothesis of Blake’s hyperphantasia is proposed in John Higgs’, William Blake vs The World (London: Orion Publishing Co, 2021) pp. 136–140. No footnote references are provided. Hyperphantasia, as so far conceptualized, is a newly identified condition (or dysfunction) arising from a perceptual over-abundance of visual imagery. As Blake insisted he had verbal auditory, as well as visual ‘visions,’ it would appear to have limited application.

  6. 6.

    Dominic H. ffytche, Visual hallucinatory syndromes: Past, present, and future, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 9 (2007) pp. 173–189.

  7. 7.

    For the shortage of synaesthesia subjects in research experiments, see Mankin JL. ‘Deepening understanding of language through synaesthesia: a call to reform and expand.’ Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374 (2019): 20180350; https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0350.

  8. 8.

    BR(2): p. 40.

  9. 9.

    Leonard Smith, Lunatic Hospitals in Georgian England, 1750–1830 (London: Taylor and Francis, 2007).

  10. 10.

    BR(2): 274.

  11. 11.

    BR(2): 283.

  12. 12.

    BR(2): 394.

  13. 13.

    BR(2): 396.

  14. 14.

    R.W. Shufeldt, Notes on paleopathology, Popular Science Monthly (1892), pp. 679–684.

  15. 15.

    BR(2): 387.

  16. 16.

    O. Parker Jones, F. Alfaro-Almagro, S. Jbabdi, An empirical, 21st century evaluation of phrenology, Cortex 106 (2018) pp. 26–35.

  17. 17.

    M.H. Kaufman, N. Basden, Items relating to Dr Johann Gaspar Spurzheim (1776–1832) in The Henderson Trust collection, formerly the museum collection of the Phrenological Society of Edinburgh: With an abbreviated iconography, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9 (1996) pp. 301–325.

  18. 18.

    BR(2): 390.

  19. 19.

    Muramoto, O. Retrospective diagnosis of a famous historical figure: ontological, epistemic, and ethical considerations. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 9, 10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-9-10; Mathias Schmidt, Saskia Wilhelmy, Dominik Gross, Retrospective diagnosis of mental illness: past and present, The Lancet Psychiatry, 7 (2020) pp. 14–16; Anne Marie E. Snoddy, Julia Beaumont, Hallie R. Buckley, Antony Colombo, Siân E. Halcrow, Rebecca L. Kinaston, Melandri Vlok, Sensationalism and speaking to the public: Scientific rigour and interdisciplinary collaborations in palaeopathology, International Journal of Paleopathology 28 (2020) pp. 88–91.

  20. 20.

    Cunningham, A. Identifying disease in the past: cutting the Gordian knot. Asclepio, 54 (2002), 13–34; Piers D. Mitchell, Retrospective diagnosis and the use of historical texts for investigating disease in the past, International Journal of Paleopathology, 1, (2011) pp. 81–88. See also Axel Karenberg & Ferdinand Peter Moog (2004) Next Emperor, Please! No End to Retrospective Diagnostics, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 13:2, 143–149.

  21. 21.

    Jane E. Buikstra, Della C. Cook, Katelyn L. Bolhofner, Introduction: Scientific rigor in paleopathology, Jane E. Buikstra (ed.), Special Issue: Special Issue: Rigor in Paleopathology: Perspectives from across the Discipline, International Journal of Paleopathology, 19 (2017) pp. 80–87.

  22. 22.

    Roderick D. Buchanan, Syndrome du jour: The historiography and moral implications of Diagnosing Darwin, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 90 (2021) pp. 86–101.

  23. 23.

    Juan J. Grau, Inés Bartolomé, Cristina Garrido, Alex Iranzo, Medicine in the Prado Museum, Madrid, Spain: Signs of illness, and medical procedures in the art works, Medicina Clínica (English Edition) 159 (2022) pp. 497–504.

  24. 24.

    Appelbaum, Paul S. “Reflections on the Goldwater rule.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry Law 45.2 (2017): 228–232.

  25. 25.

    Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. British Medical Journal. 2: 5969, (1975) pp. 486–489.

  26. 26.

    Heinrich Klüver, ‘Mescal Visions and Eidetic Vision,’ The American Journal of Psychology 37 (1926), pp. 502–515; Frederick K.D. Nahm and Karl H. Pribram, “Heinrich Kluver.” National Academy of Sciences. 1998. Biographical Memoirs: Volume 73. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9650.

  27. 27.

    G. B. Ermentrout and J.D. Cowan, ‘A Mathematical Theory of Visual Hallucination Patterns,’ Biological Cybernetics 34 (1979) pp. 137–150; Paul C. Bressloff, J.D. Cowan, M. Golubitsky, P.J. Thomas, M. Wiener, ‘Geometric visual hallucinations, Euclidean symmetry and the functional architecture of striate cortex,’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences B 356 (2001) pp. 299–330.

  28. 28.

    Paul C. Bressloff and Jack D. Cowan, ‘The functional geometry of local and horizontal connections in a model of V1,’ Journal of Physiology-Paris 97 (2003) pp. 221–236.

  29. 29.

    Jack D. Cowan, ‘Geometric visual hallucinations and the structure of the visual cortex,’ Daniel Collerton, Urs Peter Mosimann, Elaine Perry (eds.) The Neuroscience of Visual Hallucinations (2014) chapter 10, pp. 217–253, cited on p. 228. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118892794.

  30. 30.

    Some evidence exists to suggest that fMRI can be used to predict subjective responses to retinotopic patterns in V1, Yukiyasu Kamitani and Frank Tong, ‘Decoding the Visual and Subjective Contents of the Human Brain,’ Nature Neuroscience 8.5 (2005): 679–685.

  31. 31.

    S. Zeki and M. Lamb, ‘The neurology of kinetic art,’ Brain 117 (1994) pp. 607–636.

  32. 32.

    A good starting point for a review of the debate, and an important contribution towards resolving it, is, Crawford I.P. Winlove, Fraser Milton, Jake Ranson, Jon Fulford, Matthew MacKisack, Fiona Macpherson, Adam Zeman, The neural correlates of visual imagery: A co-ordinate-based meta-analysis, Cortex, 105 (2018) pp. 4–25.

  33. 33.

    David Worrall, ‘Les Relations de William Blake et de Mécènes, vues sous L’Angle de la Neurologie,’ in Le Mécènat litteraire oaux XIXe et XXe siècles, ed. Anne Struve-Debeaux (Paris: Editions Hermann, 2019) pp. 119–139.

  34. 34.

    Nicolas Rothen, Beat Meier, Jamie Ward, Enhanced memory ability: Insights from synaesthesia, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36 (2012) pp. 1952–1963.

  35. 35.

    Paul Youngquist, Madness and Blake’s Myth (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989) p. 42.

  36. 36.

    M.M. Ohayon, ‘Prevalence of hallucinations and their pathological associations in the general population,’ Psychiatry Res, 997 (2000), pp. 153–164.

  37. 37.

    Vanessa Beavan, John Read & Claire Cartwright (2011), The prevalence of voice-hearers in the general population: A literature review, Journal of Mental Health, 20:3, 281–292.

  38. 38.

    Mary Jane Spiller, Clare N. Jonas, Julia Simner, Ashok Jansari, ‘Beyond visual imagery: How modality-specific is enhanced mental imagery in synesthesia?, Consciousness and Cognition, 31 (2015) pp. 73–85. For a nuances to that paper’s findings, see David Brang, EunSeon Ahn, Double-blind study of visual imagery in grapheme-color synesthesia, Cortex, 117 (2019) pp. 89–95.

  39. 39.

    Pidgeon, L. M., Grealy, M., Duffy, A. H. B., Hay, L., McTeague, C., Vuletic, T., Coyle, D. and Gilbert, S. J. (2016), Functional neuroimaging of visual creativity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain and Behavior, 6: 1–26.

  40. 40.

    For Blake’s ability to caricature contemporary royalty and political figures, see Alexander S. Gourlay, “‘Idolatry or Politics’: Blake’s Chaucer, the Gods of Priam, & the Powers of 1809.” Prophetic Character: Essays on William Blake in Honor of John E. Grant (ed.) Alexander S. Gourlay (West Cornwall, CT: Locust Hill P, 2002). pp. 97–147.

  41. 41.

    Adam Zeman, Matthew MacKisack, John Onians, The Eye’s mind – Visual imagination, neuroscience and the humanities, Cortex, 105 (2018) pp. 1–3.

  42. 42.

    Joel Pearson, Colin W.G. Clifford, Frank Tong, The Functional Impact of Mental Imagery on Conscious Perception, Current Biology, 18 (2008) pp. 982–986.

  43. 43.

    For a key paper at the beginning of this debate, see Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 1–24.

  44. 44.

    BR(2): p. 423, 427.

  45. 45.

    BR(2): p. 729.

  46. 46.

    Right-handedness has a lower correlation than left-handedness with schizophrenia, Hirnstein, Marco, and Kenneth Hugdahl. “Excess of Non-Right-Handedness in Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of Gender Effects and Potential Biases in Handedness Assessment.” British Journal of Psychiatry 205 (2014) pp. 260–267.

  47. 47.

    Durjoy Lahiri, Stefano F. Cappa, Left hemispheric stroke in a professional artist: A prospective case study, Cortex, 138 (2021) pp. 203–211.

  48. 48.

    Bradford A. Richardson, MD, Alexandra M. Rusyniak, W. George Rusyniak, Jr, MD, Charles B. Rodning, MD, PhD, Neuroanatomical Interpretation of the Painting Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh, Neurosurgery 81 (2017) pp. 389–396.

  49. 49.

    Julio Montes-Santiago, ‘Chapter 9 – The lead-poisoned genius: Saturnism in famous artists across five centuries,’ Stanley Finger, Dahlia W. Zaidel, François Boller and Julien Bogousslavsky (eds.), Progress in Brain Research 203 (2013) pp. 223–240. Bartlomiej Piechowski-Jozwiak and Julien Bogousslavsky consider migraine, but their chapter makes no reference to Blake, ‘Chapter 11 – Neurological diseases in famous painters,’ Stanley Finger, Dahlia W. Zaidel, François Boller and Julien Bogousslavsky (eds.), Progress in Brain Research (203 (2013) pp. 255–275; Gabriele Cipriani, Luca Cipriani, Lucia Picchi, Mario Di Fiorino, Art is long, life is short. Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes (1746–1828), the suffering artist, Medical Hypotheses, 117 (2018) pp. 16–20.

  50. 50.

    John Fothergill, ‘Observations on Disorders to which Painters in Water-Colours are exposed,’ The Works of John Fothergill, M.D. … with Some Account of His Life by John Coakley Lettsom (1784) 3 vols., vol. 3 pp. 377–381. Margaret DeLacy, ‘Fothergill, John (1712–1780),’ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Oct 2007 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/9979, accessed 3 March 2015].

  51. 51.

    Lane Robson and Joseph Viscomi, ‘Blake’s Death,’ Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 30 (1996) pp. 36–49.

  52. 52.

    Richard Twiss, 13, 25 September 1794, cited in Keri Davies, ‘Mrs Bliss: a Blake Collector of 1794,’ (eds.) Steve Clark and David Worrall, Blake in the Nineties (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999) pp. 212–230; Gerald P. Tyson, Joseph Johnson, A Liberal Publisher (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1979).

  53. 53.

    BR(2): p. 556, the underlining is in Bentley.

  54. 54.

    Alexander Jacques Francois Brierre De Boismont, Hallucinations or, the Rational History of Apparitions, visions, Dreams, Ecstasy, Magnetism and Somnambulism (Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston, 1853) p. 85.

  55. 55.

    See Colin Trodd’s discussion of the responses of James Joyce and W.B. Yeats, Visions of Blake: William Blake in the Art Word 1830–1930 (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2012) pp. 375–378. Trodd cites Richard Garnett, William Blake: Painter and Poet (1895) p. 75.

  56. 56.

    Representative studies include, L.A. Duncan-Johnstone, A Psychological Study of William Blake (London: Psychology Guild, 1945) and W.P. Witcutt, Blake: A Psychological Study (London: Hollis & Carter 1945); George Wingfield Digby, Symbol and Image in William Blake (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957); Daniel Majdiak and Brian Wilkie, ‘Blake and Freud: Poetry and Depth Psychology,’ Journal of Aesthetic Education 6 (1972) pp. 87–98; Morris Eaves, ‘Postscript: Blake’s Abnormal Psychology,’ Blake: An Illustrated Quarterly 9 (1976) pp. 121–122; Diane Hume George, Blake and Freud (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980); David Punter, ‘Blake, Trauma and the Female,’ New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation 15 (1984) pp. 475–490; Brenda Webster, Blake’s Prophetic Psychology (Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1984); Elaine Kauvar, ‘The Sorrows of Thel: A Freudian Interpretation of The Book of Thel,’ Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 6 (1985) pp. 174–185; Jerry Caris Godard, Creating: William Blake Anticipates Freud, Jung and Rank (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985); Edward F. Edinger, Encounter with the Self: A Jungian Commentary on William Blake’s Illustrations to the Book of Job (Toronto: Inner City Book, 1986); Barbara Frieling, ‘Blake at the Rim of the World: A Jungian Consideration of Jerusalem,’ Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 8 (1987) pp. 211–218; Tilottama Rajan, ‘(Dis)figuring the System: Vision, History, and Trauma in Blake’s Lambeth Books,’ William Blake: Images and Texts, Robert N. Essick et al. (ed) (San Marino: CA: Huntington Library, 1997); June Singer, Blake, Jung and the Collective Unconscious (York Beach: Nicolas Hays Inc., 2000); Mark Lussier, Blake and Lacan (Studies in nineteenth-century British literature, 25) (New York; Frankfurt: Lang, 2008); Patrick Menneteau, ‘William Blake and the dark side of the Enlightenment: toward a reassessment of the Jungian contribution,’ Serge Soupel, Kevin L. Cope, Alexander Pettit (eds), The Enlightenment by Night: essays on after-dark culture in the long eighteenth century (New York: AMS Press, 2010) pp. 307–342.

  57. 57.

    Nettle, Daniel, and Helen Clegg. “Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans.” Proceedings. Biological sciences vol. 273,1586 (2006): 611–615. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3349; Daniel Nettle, Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians, Journal of Research in Personality 40 (2006) pp. 876–890.

  58. 58.

    BR(2) p. 695, underlining in Bentley.

  59. 59.

    G.E. Bentley Jr., The Stranger From Paradise: A Biography of William Blake (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001) pp. 21, 382; Jon Mee, Dangerous Enthusiasm: William Blake and the Culture of Radicalism in the 1790s (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).

  60. 60.

    Robert N. Essick, ‘Blake, William (1757–1827),’ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Oct 2005 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/2585, accessed 21 Aug 2017.

  61. 61.

    John Higgs, William Blake vs The World (London: Orion Publishing Co, 2021) pp. 14–20.

  62. 62.

    Leopold Damrosch, Eternity’s Sunrise: The Imaginative World of William Blake (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2015) p. 39.

  63. 63.

    P.R. Corlett, ‘Delusions,’ Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition), edited by V.S. Ramachandran (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2012) pp. 667–673. For a wider discussion, see Richard Dub, ‘Delusions, Acceptances, and Cognitive Feelings,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2017) pp. 27–60. P.R. Corlett, J.R. Taylor, X.J. Wang, P.C. Fletcher and J.H. Krystal, ‘Toward a neurobiology of delusions,’ Progress in Neurobiology 92 (2010), pp. 345–369.

  64. 64.

    BR(2): p. 425.

  65. 65.

    BR(2): p. 327.

  66. 66.

    The term ‘eidetic’ has some currency in discussions of synaesthesia, J. Glicksohn, ‘Synesthesia,’ Encyclopedia of Creativity (Second Edition), edited by Mark A. Runco and Steven R. Pritzker (San Diego: Academic Press 2011) pp. 403–408. See also with respect to aphantasia and hyperphantasia, Pearson, J. The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 20, 624–634 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9.

  67. 67.

    Kevin T. Dann, “Sensory Unity Before the Fall: Synaesthesia, Eideticism, and the Loss of Eden.” Bright Colors Falsely Seen: Synaesthesia and the Search for Transcendental Knowledge (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), pp. 94–119.

  68. 68.

    Herbert A. Schreier, ‘Hallucinations in Nonpsychotic Children: More Common Than We Think?’ Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 38 (1999) pp. 623–625; R. McGee, S.W.R. Poulton, ‘Hallucinations in nonpsychotic children [Letter to the Editor], Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 39 (2000), pp. 12–13.

  69. 69.

    Allport, G.W. (1924), Eidetic Imagery. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 15: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1924.tb00168.x.

  70. 70.

    BR(2): 282.

  71. 71.

    Laura Quinney, William Blake on Self and Soul (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009) p. 22.

  72. 72.

    Naomi Billingsley, The Visionary Art of William Blake: Christianity, Romanticism and the Pictorial Imagination (London: T&T Clark, 2018) pp. 1, 2, 147–149, 152–154, 156–157. There are several versions of this painting, not all extant, see Butlin: 639, 642, 645.

  73. 73.

    Jonathan Roberts, ‘William Blake’s Visionary Landscape near Felpham,’ Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 47 (2013) http://128.151.244.100/blakeojs/index.php/blake/article/view/roberts472/roberts472html.

  74. 74.

    ffytche, Dominic H. “Visual hallucinatory syndromes: past, present, and future.” Dialogues in clinical neuroscience vol. 9,2 (2007): 173–189. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2007.9.2/dffytche.

  75. 75.

    Dominic H. ffytche, ‘Visual hallucinations and the Charles Bonnet syndrome,’ Current Psychiatry Reports, 7 (2005) pp. 168–179.

  76. 76.

    Thomas Charles Butler, Marc Benayoun, Edward Wallace, Wim van Drongelen, Nigel Goldenfeld and Jack Cowan, ‘Evolutionary constraints on visual cortex architecture from the dynamics of hallucinations,’ PNAS [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America] 109 (2012) pp. 606–609.

  77. 77.

    H. Henke, P.A. Robinson, P.M. Drysdale, P.N. Loxley, ‘Spatiotemporally varying visual hallucinations: I. Corticothalamic theory,’ Journal of Theoretical Biology, 357 (2014) pp. 200–209.

  78. 78.

    Butlin: 639–648.

  79. 79.

    For Blake’s aesthetics, see Daniel Schierenbeck, ‘“Sublime Labours”: Aesthetics and Political Economy in Blake’s Jerusalem,’ Studies in Romanticism 46 (2007), pp. 21–42; Peter Otto, ‘Politics, Aesthetics, and Blake’s “bounding line,”’ Word & Image 26 (2010) pp. 172–185); Mike Goode, ‘The Joy of Looking: What Blake’s Pictures Want,’ Representations 119 (2012) pp. 1–36.

  80. 80.

    On ‘entoptic,’ the current OED definition is not entirely satisfactory, ‘relating to the appearance of the different internal structures of the eye,’ ‘ento-, prefix.’ OED Online. March 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/62905?redirectedFrom=entoptic (accessed March 22, 2015). Even in current scientific literature at the peer-reviewed journal article level, the word ‘entoptic’ is sometimes misspelled.

  81. 81.

    BR(2): p. 636.

  82. 82.

    For a useful introduction to migraine and migraine aura, with illustrations, see I. F Gutteridge and B.L. Cole, ‘Perspectives on migraine: Prevalence and visual symptoms.’ Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 84 (2001), pp. 56–70.

  83. 83.

    [J.] E. Esquirol, Mental Maladies: Treatise on Insanity, trans. E. K. Hunt (Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard, 1845) p. 106.

  84. 84.

    [J.] E. Esquirol, Mental Maladies: Treatise on Insanity, trans. E. K. Hunt (Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard, 1845) p. 110, italics in original.

  85. 85.

    BR(2): p. 437.

  86. 86.

    M.M. Ohayon, ‘Prevalence of hallucinations and their pathological associations in the general population,’ Psychiatry Res, 997 (2000), pp. 153–164; Simon R. Jones, Charles Fernyhough and David Meads, ‘In a dark time: Development, validation, and correlates of the Durham hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations questionnaire,’ Personality and Individual Differences 46 (2009) pp. 30–34.

  87. 87.

    S. Foster Damon, William Blake: His Philosophy and Symbols (New York: Peter Smith, 1947) pp. 10, 196–211. Foster Damon’s, A Blake Dictionary: The Ideas and Symbols of William Blake (1965), received updating editions in 1988 and 2013, both edited by Morris Eaves.

  88. 88.

    The founding work is E.R. Jaensch, Eidetic Imagery and Typological Methods of Investigation, trans. Oscar Oeser (London: Kegan Paul, 1930). See also, Bo H. Lindberg, ‘William Blake’s visions and the Unio Artistica,’ Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis (Stockholm) 5 (1970) pp. 141–167.

  89. 89.

    E.R. Jaensch, Eidetic Imagery and Typological Methods of Investigation: their importance for the psychology of childhood … Translated from the second edition by Oscar Oeser (London: Kegan Paul & Co, 1930); Morton Paley, Energy and the Imagination: A Study of the Development of Blake’s Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970) pp. 201–206. On the possibility of Blake’s autism, see below, Chap. 9.

  90. 90.

    Confusingly, the older term ‘eidetic’ has sometimes recently been used to describe palinopsia (after-image) type events, marking a return to early twentieth-century usage, e.g. Allport, G.W. (1924), Eidetic Imagery. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 15: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1924.tb00168.x.

  91. 91.

    James Deville, William Blake, plaster cast of head, 1823, NPG 1809; bronze casting, 1953, NPG 1809a, National Portrait Gallery, London.

  92. 92.

    Joseph Burke, ‘The Eidetic and the Borrowed Image: An Interpretation of Blake’s Theory and Practice of Art,’ Frantz Philipp and June Stewart (eds.) In Honour of Daryl Lindsay: Essays and Studies (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1964) pp. 110–127, 116.

  93. 93.

    BR(2): p. 290.

  94. 94.

    BR(2): 390.

  95. 95.

    Manuela Stoicescu, Chapter 2 – Patient Faces, Editor(s): Dr Manuela Stoicescu, General Medical Semiology Guide Part I (Academic Press, 2020) pp. 21–79. See Fig. 2.1.1. ‘Exophthalmia.’

  96. 96.

    G.E. Bentley, Jr. with the assistance of Keiko Aoyama, ‘William Blake and His Circle: A Checklist of Publications and Discoveries in 1995,’ Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 29 (1996) pp. 131–165.

  97. 97.

    BR(2): 390.

  98. 98.

    Robin Hamlyn, ‘William Blake at Work: “Every thing which is in Harmony,”’ Joyce H. Townsend and Robin Hamlyn (eds.) William Blake: The Painter at Work (London: Tate Publishing, 2003) pp. 12–39, pp. 24–25.

  99. 99.

    Jack D. Cowan, ‘Geometric visual hallucinations and the structure of the visual cortex,’ Daniel Collerton, Urs Peter Mosimann, Elaine Perry (eds.) The Neuroscience of Visual Hallucinations (2014) chapter 10, pp. 217–253.

  100. 100.

    For a counter view, see Larry Cahill, Chapter 10 – Sex Influences Exist at All Levels of Human Brain Function, Editor(s): Marianne J. Legato, Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine (Third Edition) (Academic Press, 2017) pp. 121–128.

  101. 101.

    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill (1651) p. 6.

  102. 102.

    Robert N. Essick, The Separate Plates of William Blake (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983) Cat. No. XVI, pp. 61–89; Dennis Read, ‘The Context of Blake’s Public Address: Cromek and the Chalcographic Society,’ Philogical Quarterly 60 (1981) pp. 69–86.

  103. 103.

    John Ayre, ‘Frye and Pattern,’ ESC: English Studies in Canada 37 (2011) pp. 9–15.

  104. 104.

    Mitchell, W. J. T. “Style as Epistemology: Blake and the Movement toward Abstraction in Romantic Art.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 16, no. 2 (1977) pp. 145–164.

  105. 105.

    W.J.T. Mitchell, Blake’s Composite Art: A Study of the Illuminated Poetry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978) p. 37.

  106. 106.

    W.J.T. Mitchell, Blake’s Composite Art: A Study of the Illuminated Poetry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978) p. 74. On Blake’s synaesthesia, see my Chap. 7.

  107. 107.

    Crick, Francis, and Christof Koch. “Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness.” In Seminars in the Neurosciences, vol. 2, pp. 263–275. Saunders Scientific Publications, 1990. For the debate, see Daniel Revach, Moti Salti, Expanding the discussion: Revision of the fundamental assumptions framing the study of the neural correlates of consciousness, Consciousness and Cognition, 96 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103229; Ilya A. Kanaev, Evolutionary origin and the development of consciousness, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 133 (2022) 104511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.034.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Worrall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Worrall, D. (2024). Introduction. In: William Blake's Visions. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53254-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation