Visualizing Online Search Processes for Information Literacy Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Experience and Information Literacy (ECIL 2023)

Abstract

Online searching happens today mostly on personal devices and through personalized accounts. Information Literacy and online searching education suffer from the invisibility of online searching behaviors, which makes process-oriented feedback virtually impossible in class. Thanks to the instructional deployment of insights and technologies developed in a research project, we designed and delivered a class session based on the visualization of the students’ search processes, involving 535 secondary school students and 16 teachers. The analysis of the data collected via a post-session survey that included both quantitative and qualitative items along with feedback from the teachers provides initial evidence of the effectiveness of this novel approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botturi, L., Addimando, L., Hermida, M., Beretta, C.: Reflective information literacy education with search story plots. Paper presented at the Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy, online (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teevan, J.: How people recall, recognize, and reuse search results. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26(4), 1–27 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1402256.1402258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen, E.J.: Creating teachable moments... and making them last. Innov. High. Educ. 23(1), 7–26 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corrall, S.: Crossing the threshold: reflective practice in information literacy development. J. Inf. Literacy 11(1), 23–53 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruce, C., Edwards, S., Lupton, M.: Six frames for information literacy education: a conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innov. Teach. Learn. Inf. Comput. Sci. 5(1), 1–18 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orr, D., Appleton, M., Wallin, M.: Information literacy and flexible delivery: creating a conceptual framework and model. J. Acad. Librariansh. 27(6), 457–463 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Context matters: analysing the performance of information retrieval systems as a function of the retrieval task. J. Doc. 58(1), 30–45 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marchionini, G.: Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dumouchel, M.P.V.K.G., Papadakis, K.L.S.: How does students’ knowledge about information-seeking improve their behavior in solving information problems? Int. J. 12(1), 113–137 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, B., Liu, J.: Investigating the role of in-situ user expectations in web search. Inf. Process. Manage. 60(3), 103300 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gwizdka, J., Spence, I.: What can searching behavior tell us about the difficulty of information tasks? A study of web navigation. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 43(1), 1–22 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Walhout, J., Oomen, P., Jarodzka, H., Brand-Gruwel, S.: Effects of task complexity on online search behavior of adolescents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 68(6), 1449–1461 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aula, A., Khan, R. M., Guan, Z.: How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 35–44 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsai, M.J.: Online information searching strategy inventory (OISSI): a quick version and a complete version. Comput. Educ. 53(2), 473–483 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aula, A., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K.J.: Eye-tracking reveals the personal styles for search result evaluation. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1058–1061 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues, L., et al.: How personalization affects motivation in gamified review assessments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 1–38 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, X., Li, X., Lu, J.: The impact of information source preference on internet search behavior. J. Bus. Res. 92, 247–256 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tatcher, A.: Web search strategies: the influence of web experience and task type. Inf. Process. Manage. 44, 1308–1329 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duggan, G.B., Payne, S.J.: Knowledge in the head and on the web: using topic expertise to aid search. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 39–48 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. White, R.W., Dumais, S.T., Teevan, J.: Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 132–141 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lucassen, T., Schraagen, J.M.: The influence of source cues and topic familiarity on credibility evaluation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1387–1392 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Kröhne, U., Naumann, J.: The role of reading skills in the evaluation of online information gathered from search engine environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 223–234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hölscher, C., Strube, G.: Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Comput. Netw. 33(1–6), 337–346 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tu, Y.W., Shih, M., Tsai, C.C.: Eighth graders’ web searching strategies and outcomes: the role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs. Comput. Educ. 51(3), 1142–1153 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenkins, C., Corritore, C.L., Wiedenbeck, S.: Patterns of information seeking on the web: a qualitative study of domain expertise and web expertise. IT Soc. 1(3), 64–89 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon, M., Pathak, P.: Finding information on the world wide web: the retrieval effectiveness of search engines. Inf. Process. Manage. 35(2), 141–180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sang, Y., Brynjolfsson, E.: Search quality and search effort in information-seeking behavior. Manage. Sci. 66(4), 1729–1750 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robson, D.A., Allen, M.S., Howard, S.J.: Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 146(4), 324–354 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, J., Cheng, G.H.L., Chen, T., Leung, K.: Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: a meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 40(6), 693–708 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Botturi, L., Beretta, C.: Screencasting information literacy. Insights in pre-service teachers’ conception of online search. J. Media Literacy Educ. 14(3), 94–107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2022-14-3-8

  31. Botturi, L., Galloni, M., Hermida, M., Giordano, S., Addimando, L., Bouleimen, A: Late-Teenager Online Information Search (2022). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/62895

  32. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D.K.: Likert scale: explored and explained. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 7(4), 396–405 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Botturi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Botturi, L., Hermida, M., Addimando, L., Beretta, C. (2024). Visualizing Online Search Processes for Information Literacy Education. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., et al. Information Experience and Information Literacy. ECIL 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2043. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52998-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52998-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52997-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52998-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation