The Instrumentalities of Equal Access to Justice: Defending Democratic Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equal Access to Justice

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 145))

Abstract

The point of this Chapter is to carve out political principles that could ground the duty to, at times and provisionally, pause, cool down and listen, as a specific political obligation. The Chapter argues that: first, expanding people’s real opportunities of accessing justice has a value that is dependent on, but not only instrumental to, the value of protecting institutional and social arrangements that allow the effective cooperation between all persons on the basis of their equality; second, social interest and political focus on access to justice has an epistemic value, since it points to perspicuous evidence on the actual functioning of legal and political institutions and on the possible effects of legal reforms; and, third, consistent efforts to realize effective access to justice for all in the space of capabilities have an expressive value, since they embody the ideals of a democratic culture. These three political principles thus specify the political content of the duty to pause, cool down and listen: We should model public institutions in access to justice, the chapter argues, as a means to protect people from unequal social relations, as a means to protect the epistemic capacities of public institutions, and as a means to express a democratic culture in dispute resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Anderson (1999, 2012).

  2. 2.

    See Anderson (2012), p. 3, n. 4.

  3. 3.

    See, for an illustrative example, Cohen (2008).

  4. 4.

    See Anderson (2006). See also Estlund (2009).

  5. 5.

    Perhaps a ‘thought-provoking’, or ‘eye opening’, or ‘inspirational’ fantasy, but still a fantasy, nonetheless.

  6. 6.

    Reginald Smith anticipated a similar argument in 1919. See Smith (1919), p. 10: “There exist today businesses established, conducted, and flourishing on the principle that as against the poor the law can be violated with impunity because redress is beyond their reach. […] The effects of this denial of justice are far reaching. Nothing rankles more in the human heart than the feeling of injustice. It produces a sense of helplessness, then bitterness. It is brooded over. It leads directly to contempt for law, disloyalty to the Government, and plants the seeds of anarchy. The conviction grows that law is not justice and challenges the belief that justice is best secured when administered according to law. The poor come to think of American justice as containing only laws that punish and never laws that help. They are against the law because they consider the law against them. A persuasion spreads that there is one law for the rich and another for the poor”.

References

  • Anderson, E. 1999. What is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109: 287–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3: 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Fundamental Disagreement between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarian. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, D. 2009. Democratic Authority. A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1919. Justice and the Poor: A Study of the Present Denial of Justice to the Poor. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Segatti, M. (2024). The Instrumentalities of Equal Access to Justice: Defending Democratic Cooperation. In: Equal Access to Justice. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52939-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52939-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52938-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52939-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation