Abstract
Despite the fact that daily dentistry is rapidly integrating technology in recent years, and the digitalization of complete workflows, from preparation to impressions and restorations manufacturing, is accessible to the majority of dentists, when it comes to selecting proper materials based on color properties, most dentists rely on shade selection via visual comparison of dental tissues to shade tabs, irrelevant to the final restoration in terms of material and optical properties. This practice has remained unaltered or least evolved during decades. This might be the result of the lack of familiarization of dentists to dimensions of color and ways of measuring them.
The most difficult part regarding chromatometry (measuring of color) lies in the cross-calibration of equipment. Up to the development of digital sensors for photographic use, the only option was hardware calibration, a task not at all easy. After moving to the digital era of photography, potentials developed are numberless, since the option of post-processing of image files bearing color information is present and simple, non-calibratable hardware such as photographic equipment or even smartphone devices can be utilized for color measurement.
There are yet many unknown paths to be explored towards the ingression of digital chromatometry in everyday dentistry. Some efforts of integration as an add-on application into 3-D scanners software do not yet offer a reliable and repeatable result and can be only considered as advisory rather than diagnostic. In this next chapter, we will explore the history and progress into the science of chromatometry, we will have a deeper look at devices of digital image capturing, specifically such as phasmatophotometers, and less specialized such as digital cameras, and we will present existing tools, methods, and applications that aim to function for dental color record and replication.
The past, present, and future of shade selection regarding materials, techniques, and practices in daily dental practice to maximize aesthetics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Fouzan AF, Tashkandi EA. Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure associated with various preparation designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:545–8.
Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J. 1988;38(2):112–8.
Simonsen RJ. New materials on the horizon. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(7):24–31.
Burke F, Lucarotti P. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 5: crowns: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018;225:33–48.
Greiner JV, Kenyon KR. Chapter 52. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology—basic sciences. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994.
Jameson KA, Highnote SM, Wasserman LM. "richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes" (PDF). Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8(2):244–61.
Jordon G. A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies. Vision Res. 1993;33(11):1495–508.
Abramov I, Gordon J, Feldman O, Chavarga A. Sex & vision I: spatio-temporal resolution. Biol Sex Diff. 2012;3:20.
Abramov I, Gordon J, Feldman O, Chavarga A. Sex and vision II: color appearance of monochromatic lights. Biol Sex Diff. 2012;3:20.
Lehmann K, Devigus A, Wentaschek S, Igiel C, Scheller H, Paravina R. Comparison of visual shade matching and electronic color measurement device. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(3):396–404.
Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):276–81.
Hunter RS. Photoelectric color-difference meter. JOSA. 1948;38(7):661. (Proceedings of the Winter Meeting of the Optical Society of America).
Hering E. 1868. Die Lehre vom binokularem Sehen. Leipzig.
“Delta E: The Color Difference”. Colorwiki.com. Accessed 16 Apr 2009.
The "Blue Turns Purple" Problem, Bruce Lindbloom.
Gómez-Polo C, Montero J, Gómez-Polo M, Martin CA. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 color difference formulas on gingival color space. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(5):401–8.
**e Hao and Fairchild Mark. The Luther condition for all: evaluating colorimetric camera design for personalized color imaging. 2022.
Paravina RD, Westland S, Kimura M, Powers JM, Imai FH. Color interaction of dental materials: blending effect of layered composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22(10):903–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kouros, P. (2024). Digital Shade Matching in Dentistry. In: Delantoni, A., Orhan, K. (eds) Digital Dentistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52826-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52826-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52825-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52826-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)