Abstract
The progression of virtual work has been delineated by technological advancements and global interconnectivity through three historical waves. With an accelerated pace and magnitude of digital transformation, we propose hybrid work as wave four, likely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this wave, organisations are transitioning towards virtual work rapidly. However, this transition occurred without comprehensive understanding of virtual teamwork and hence it lacked strategic planning. This chapter endeavours to synthesise the extensive body of literature pertaining to team virtuality, spanning a timeline of four decades. It specifically addresses the historical evolution of virtual teams, delineates the advantages, and challenges inherent in remote work arrangements. Furthermore, it conducts a detailed exploration of global virtual teams and the context of China. Implications for work–life balance and well-being were also discussed with vital insights for sha** the post-pandemic future of work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al Dilby, H. K., & Farmanesh, P. (2023). Exploring the impact of virtual leadership on job satisfaction in the post-COVID-19 era: The mediating role of work–life balance and trust in leaders [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994539.
Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00524-1
Arntz, M., Ben Yahmed, S., & Berlingieri, F. (2020). Working from home and COVID-19: The chances and risks for gender gaps. Intereconomics, 55(6), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0938-5
Ashforth, B. E. (2020). Identity and identification during and after the pandemic: How might COVID-19 change the research questions we ask? Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1763–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12629
Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Huber, A. (2021). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: How to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160
Becker, W. J., Belkin, L. Y., Tuskey, S. E., & Conroy, S. A. (2022). Surviving remotely: How job control and loneliness during a forced shift to remote work impacted employee work behaviors and well-being. Human Resource Management, 61(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22102
Bednář, P., Mariotti, I., Rossi, F., & Danko, L. (2021). The evolution of coworking spaces in Milan and Prague: Spatial patterns, diffusion, and urban change. In M. Orel, O. Dvouletý, & V. Ratten (Eds.), The Flexible Workplace: Coworking and Other Modern Workplace Transformations (pp. 59–78). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_4.
Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019
Bernardy, V., Müller, R., Röltgen, A. T., & Antoni, C. H. (2021). Leading hybrid forms of virtual teams-challenges and implications at the team and individual levels. In S. Mütze-Niewöhner, W. Hacker, T. Hartwig, S. Kauffeld, E. Latniak, M. Nicklich, & U. Pietrzyk (Eds.), Projekt- und Teamarbeit in der digitalisierten Arbeitswelt (pp. 115–138). Springer Vieweg.
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Jr., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x
Carnevale, J. B., & Hatak, I. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
Chan, X. W., Shang, S., Brough, P., Wilkinson, A., & Lu, C.-Q. (2023). Work, life and COVID-19: A rapid review and practical recommendations for the post-pandemic workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12355
Chang, H. H., Hung, C.-J., & Hsieh, H.-W. (2014). Virtual teams: Cultural adaptation, communication quality, and interpersonal trust. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25(11–12), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.704274
Chang, R. X., Carvalho, M. M., & Sbragia, R. (2023). Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework for multicultural virtual teams: A multilevel perspective exploring the relationship between multiculturalism and performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2021-0252
Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society, 28(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112
CNBC. (2023). 90% of companies say they’ll return to the office by the end of 2024—but the 5-day commute is ‘dead’, expert say. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/11/90percent-of-companies-say-theyll-return-to-the-office-by-the-end-of-2024.
Cramton, C. D. (2002). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 30(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00063-3
Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715601890
Díaz Andrade, A., & Techatassanasoontorn, A. A. (2021). Digital enforcement: Rethinking the pursuit of a digitally-enabled society. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12306
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2
Field, J. C., & Chan, X. W. (2018). Contemporary knowledge workers and the boundaryless work–life interface: Implications for the human resource management of the knowledge workforce. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02414.
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Interactive effects of team virtuality and work design on team functioning. Small Group Research, 51(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419863490
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
Hofstede, G. (1997). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
Hollingshead, A. B., Mcgrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493243003
Huang, W. W., Wei, K.-K., Watson, R. T., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2003). Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 34(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00009-X
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 66–73.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
Kane, G. C., Nanda, R., Phillips, A., & Copulsky, J. (2021). Redesigning the post-pandemic workplace. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3), 12–14.
Karl, K. A., Peluchette, J. V., & Aghakhani, N. (2022). Virtual work meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic: The good, bad, and ugly. Small Group Research, 53(3), 343–365.
Kauffeld, S., Tartler, D., Gräfe, H., Windmann, A.-K., & Sauer, N. C. (2022). What will mobile and virtual work look like in the future?—Results of a Delphi-based study. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 53(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-022-00627-8.
Kauffeld, S., Handke, L., & Straube, J. (2016). Verteilt und doch verbunden: Virtuelle teamarbeit. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-016-0308-8
Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045697
Kiely, G., Butler, T., & Finnegan, P. (2022). Global virtual teams coordination mechanisms: Building theory from research in software development. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(9), 1952–1972. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1909141
Klitmøller, A., & Lauring, J. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.023
Klonek, F. E., Kanse, L., Wee, S., Runneboom, C., & Parker, S. K. (2022). Did the COVID-19 lock-down make us better at working in virtual teams? Small Group Research, 53(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211008991
Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
Kunze, F., Hampel, K., & Zimmermann, S. (2020). Home office in der Corona-Krise: Eine nachhaltige transformation der arbeitswelt?. Policy paper no. 02. Universität Konstanz.
Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A. (2022). The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: An organizational discontinuity theory perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(21), 4251–4283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584
Lauring, J., & Jonasson, C. (2018). Can leadership compensate for deficient inclusiveness in global virtual teams? Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12184
Leenders, R. T. A. J., van Engelen, J. M. L., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5
Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
Lippert, H., & Dulewicz, V. (2018). A profile of high-performing global virtual teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(3/4), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-09-2016-0040
Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information and Management, 38(8), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00074-X
Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2005). Virtual workspace technologies. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 11–14.
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017). Communication in virtual teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
McPhail, R., Chan, X. W., May, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2023). Post-COVID remote working and its impact on people, productivity, and the planet: An exploratory sco** review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2221385.
Mi, L., Liu, W., Yuan, Y.-H., Shao, X., & Zhong, Y. (2023). Adoption of AI in response to COVID-19—A configurational perspective. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 27(4), 1455–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01711-6
Mobtech. (2020). The report on remote work during COVID-19 in China. https://www.mob.com/mobdata/report/89.
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
Panina, D., & Aiello, J. R. (2005). Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: A conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 11(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2005.03.009
Panteli, N., & Tucker, R. (2009). Power and trust in global virtual teams. Communications of the ACM, 52(12), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1145/1610252.1610282
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.020
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information and Management, 50(4), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002
Ratcheva, V., & Vyakarnam, S. (2001). Exploring team formation processes in virtual partnerships. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(7), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006231
Rese, A., Görmar, L., & Herbig, A. (2022). Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity. Review of Managerial Science, 16(2), 391–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00445-0
Sarker, S., Ahuja, M., Sarker, S., & Kirkeby, S. (2011). The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 273–310. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280109
Schlaegel, C., Gunkel, M., & Taras, V. (2023). COVID-19 and individual performance in global virtual teams: The role of self-regulation and individual cultural value orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2671
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003
Sohrabi, B., Gholipour, A., & Amiri, B. (2011). The influence of information technology on organizational behavior: Study of identity challenges in virtual teams. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 7(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/jec.2011040102
Spataro, J. (2020). 2 years of digital transformation in 2 months. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/04/30/2-years-digital-transformation-2-months/.
Sun, L., Liu, T., & Wang, W. (2023). Working from home in urban China during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assemblages of work-family interference. Work, Employment and Society, 37(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080870
Sytch, M., & Greer, l. I. (2020). Is your organization ready for permanent WFH? Harvard business review. https://hbr.org/2020/08/is-your-organizationready-for-permanent-wfh.
ter Hoeven, C. L., & van Zoonen, W. (2015). Flexible work designs and employee well-being: examining the effects of resources and demands. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12052
Tietze, S., & Musson, G. (2005). Recasting the home-work relationship: A case of mutual adjustment? Organization Studies, 26(9), 1331–1352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054619
Vione, K. C., & Kotera, Y. (2023). Mindfulness-based approaches for COVID-19 mental health in working from home. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21(2), 1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00647-3
Vuchkovski, D., Zalaznik, M., Mitręga, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2023). A look at the future of work: The digital transformation of teams from conventional to virtual. Journal of Business Research, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113912.
Wade, M., & Shan, J. (2020). Covid-19 has accelerated digital transformation, but may have made it harder not easier. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00034.
Wandt, J. (2020). Nach sechs monaten imhomeoffice: Wie beschäftigte die situation einschätzen. http://idw-online.de/de/news757746.
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
Zakaria, N., & Yusof, S. A. M. (2020). Crossing cultural boundaries using the Internet: Toward building a model of swift trust formation in global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 26(1), 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.10.004
Zhang, H., Mi, L., Shao, X., & Bu, J. (2023). Demystifying pathways of composition-based international strategies under the de-globalization world: A configurational approach. Journal of International Management, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101085.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mi, L., Ge, G. (2024). Post-pandemic Workplace Practices and Their Impact on the Work-Life Experiences of Global Virtual Teams: Insights from the Asia–Pacific Region. In: Chan, X.W., Shang, S., Lu, L. (eds) Work-Life Research in the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Studies in Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Indigenization in Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52795-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52795-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52794-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52795-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)