Lockdown Experiences of Social Reading

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Habits in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This chapter examines a number of related issues and findings concerned with the social aspect of reading and how the pandemic may have altered the ways that participants accessed books and discussed their reading with others. We first explore both the personal and social practices of reading, examining what we know about reading in social contexts. We examine how COVID-19 undoubtedly affected the ways in which these practices are conceived and undertaken by readers, highlighting the increased affordances of online tools such as Zoom and MS Teams to set up virtual reading groups. We then turn to our data to consider two specific questions, comparing reported behaviours pre- and during the pandemic: participants’ preferred way of reading; and how frequently and in what formats they talked about their reading with others. The chapter thus explores the extent to which participants perceived the pandemic had affected the specific formats and situations in which books were read and or discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The most common mechanism by which this kind of language change occurred during the pandemic was via compounding; see Pura et al. (2022).

  2. 2.

    The POPSUGAR reading challenge offers readers a set of prompts to encourage them to read new book. In 2020, readers were given forty standard and ten advanced prompts ‘challenging’ them, for example, to ‘Read a book with a great first line’ and ‘Read a book on a subject you know nothing about’; see Block (2019).

  3. 3.

    See also Davies et al. (2022, p. 35) for discussion.

References

  • Auyong, Elaine. 2020. What we mean by reading. New Literary History 5: 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Tara. 2019. Find a Cosy Nook, Book-Lovers—the 2020 POPSUGAR Reading Challenge Is Here! https://www.popsugar.co.uk/entertainment/reading-challenge-2020-46911508#photo-46911603. Accessed 10th February 2024.

  • BookBrowse. 2020. Book clubs in lockdown. Saratoga, CA: BookBrowse LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boztas, Senay. 2008. Richard and Judy ‘treat their readers as stupid’. The Guardian, August 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, Patricia. 2017. Text world theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison. Language and Literature 26 (2): 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Guy-Uriel, and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer. 2015. Habermas, the public sphere and the creation of a racial counterpublic. Michigan Journal of Race and Law. https://doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.21.1.habermas.

  • Collins, Jim. 2002. High-pop: An introduction. In High-pop: Making culture into popular entertainment, ed. Jim Collins, 1–31. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrea, Debra. 2010. Reading 2.0: From solitary to social. School Librarian’s Workshop 31: 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Ben, Christina Lupton, and Johanne Gormsen Schmidt. 2022. Reading novels during the Covid-19 pandemic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Danielle, and DeNel Rehberg Sedo. 2015. Reading beyond the book: The practices of contemporary literary culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli, Marcello. 2022. Reading the lockdown: Responding to covid poetry. Journal of Poetry Therapy 36: 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Wendy. 2008. Regionalism and the reading class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Trans. T. Burger. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Chloe. Forthcoming. The language of Margaret Atwood. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Chloe, and Louise Nuttall. 2020. Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. In Contemporary media stylistics, ed. Helen Ringrow and Stephen Pihlaja, 35–59. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, Jenny. 2011. Nineteenth-century reading groups in Britain and the community of the text: An experiment with little Dorrit. In Reading communities from salons to cyberspace, ed. DeNel Rehberg Sedo, 44–59. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herwick Edgar, B. 2021. The pandemic has transformed the English language. GBH News: The Curiosity Desk, March 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, David D. 2002. Want a fight? Pick one book for all New Yorkers. The New York Times, February 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulynych, Jessica. 2001. No playing in the public sphere: Democratic theory and the exclusion of children. Social Theory and Practice 27: 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmičová, Anezka. 2016. Does it matter where you read? Situating narrative in physical environment. Communication Theory 26: 290–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, Elizabeth. 2003. Book clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manguel, Albert. 1996. A history of reading. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Jessica. 2019. Intertextuality in practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norledge, Jessica. 2019. Immersive reading and the unnatural text-worlds of ‘dead fish’. In Experiencing fictional worlds, ed. Ben Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw, 157–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. 2021. How has lockdown changed our relationship with nature? Census 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/articles/howhaslockdownchangedourrelationshipwithnature/2021-04-26. Accessed 16 June 2023.

  • Pawley, Christine. 2002. ‘Seeking significance’: Actual readers, specific reading communities. Book History 5: 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplow, David. 2016. Talk about books: A study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplow, David, Joan Swann, Paolo Trimarco, and Sara Whiteley. 2016. The discourse of reading groups: Integrating cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, Francesca, and Pang Ching Bobby Chen. 2013. Gender and public talk: Accounting for women’s variable participation in the public sphere. Sociological Theory 31: 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Leah. 2019. What do we talk about when we talk about books: The history and future of reading. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pura, Cielo May, Leah Gustilo, and Thomas Biermeier. 2022. How the pandemic fuels linguistic change: Lexical innovations in L1 and L2 English varieties. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies 22: 80–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radway, Janice. 1991. Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Readers and their romances: From literary theory to cultural studies. In Reception study: From literary theory to cultural studies, ed. James L. Machor and Philip Goldstein, 213–245. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehberg Sedo, DeNel. 2011a. Reading communities from salons to cyberspace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Introduction to reading communities: Processes and formations. In Reading communities from salons to cyberspace, ed. DeNel Rehberg Sedo, 1–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011c. ‘I used to read everything that caught my eye, but…’: Cultural authority and intermediaries in a virtual young adult book club. In Reading communities from salons to cyberspace, ed. DeNel Rehberg Sedo, 101–122. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roig-Vila, Rosabel, Héctor Romero-Guerra, and José Rovira-Collado. 2021. BookTubers as multimodal reading influencers: An analysis of subscriber interactions. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070039.

  • Schellenberg Betty, A. 2011. Reading in an epistolary community in eighteenth-century England. In Reading communities from salons to cyberspace, ed. DeNel Rehberg Sedo, 25–43. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, Megan. 2010. Reading is my window: Books and the art of reading in women’s prisons. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor, Naomi. 1996. ‘In the even’ my wife read to me’: Women, reading and household life in the eighteenth century. In The practice and representation of Reading in England, ed. James Raven, Helen Small, and Naomi Tadmor, 162–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Bronwen, and Julia Round. 2016. Moderating reading and readers online. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25 (3): 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, Sherry. 2017. Alone together. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlieghe, Joachim, Jaël Muls, and Kris Rutten. 2016. Everybody reads: Reader engagement with literature in social media environments. Poetics 54: 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, Sara. 2011. Talking about ‘an accommodation’: The implications of discussion group data for community engagement and pedagogy. Language and Literature 20 (3): 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, Sara, and David Peplow. 2020. Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction: A socio-cognitive approach to reading group talk. Text and Talk 41 (1): 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 2010. The tenses of the imagination. In Tenses of imagination: Raymond Williams on science fiction, utopia and dystopia, ed. Andrew Milner, 113–124. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Giovanelli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boucher, A., Giovanelli, M., Harrison, C., Love, R., Godfrey, C. (2024). Lockdown Experiences of Social Reading. In: Reading Habits in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52753-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52753-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52752-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52753-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation