Abstract
In majority voting dynamics, a group of n agents in a social network are asked for their preferred candidate in a future election between two possible choices. At each time step, a new poll is taken, and each agent adjusts their vote according to the majority opinion of their network neighbors. After T time steps, the candidate with the majority of votes is the leading contender in the election. In general, it is very hard to predict who will be the leading candidate after a large number of time-steps.
We study, from the perspective of local certification, the problem of predicting the leading candidate after a certain number of time-steps, which we call \(\textsc {Election}\hbox {-}\textsc {Prediction}\). We show that in graphs with sub-exponential growth \(\textsc {Election}\hbox {-}\textsc {Prediction}\) admits a proof labeling scheme of size \(\mathcal {O}(\log n)\). We also find non-trivial upper bounds for graphs with a bounded degree, in which the size of the certificates are sub-linear in n.
Furthermore, we explore lower bounds for the unrestricted case, showing that locally checkable proofs for \(\textsc {Election}\hbox {-}\textsc {Prediction}\) on arbitrary \(n\)-node graphs have certificates on \(\varOmega (n)\) bits. Finally, we show that our upper bounds are tight even for graphs of constant growth.
This research was partially supported by Centro de Modelamiento Matemático (CMM), FB210005, BASAL funds for centers of excellence from ANID-Chile (P.M), FONDECYT 1230599 (P.M.), Programa Regional STIC-AMSUD (CAMA) cod. 22-STIC-02 (P.M, M.R-W, G.T), ECOS project C19E02 (G.T., M.R-W.) and ANID FONDECYT Postdoctorado 3220205 (M.R-W).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asuncion, A.U., Goodrich, M.T.: Turning privacy leaks into floods: surreptitious discovery of social network friendships and other sensitive binary attribute vectors. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 21–30 (2010)
Balliu, A., D’Angelo, G., Fraigniaud, P., Olivetti, D.: What can be verified locally? J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 97, 106–120 (2018)
Bick, A., Kol, G., Oshman, R.: Distributed zero-knowledge proofs over networks. In: 33rd ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 2426–2458 (2022)
Bousquet, N., Feuilloley, L., Pierron, T.: Local certification of graph decompositions and applications to minor-free classes. In: 25th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS). LIPIcs, vol. 217, pp. 22:1–22:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
Bredereck, R., Elkind, E.: Manipulating opinion diffusion in social networks. In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (2017)
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591 (2009)
Crescenzi, P., Fraigniaud, P., Paz, A.: Trade-offs in distributed interactive proofs. In: 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC). LIPIcs, vol. 146, pp. 13:1–13:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3(01n04), 87–98 (2000)
Esperet, L., Lévêque, B.: Local certification of graphs on surfaces. Theor. Comput. Sci. 909, 68–75 (2022)
Feuilloley, L., Bousquet, N., Pierron, T.: What can be certified compactly? Compact local certification of MSO properties in tree-like graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 131–140 (2022)
Feuilloley, L., Fraigniaud, P., Hirvonen, J.: A hierarchy of local decision. Theor. Comput. Sci. 856, 51–67 (2021)
Feuilloley, L., Fraigniaud, P., Hirvonen, J., Paz, A., Perry, M.: Redundancy in distributed proofs. Distrib. Comput. 34(2), 113–132 (2021)
Feuilloley, L., Fraigniaud, P., Montealegre, P., Rapaport, I., Rémila, É., Todinca, I.: Compact distributed certification of planar graphs. Algorithmica 1–30 (2021)
Feuilloley, L., Hirvonen, J.: Local verification of global proofs. In: 32nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing. LIPIcs, vol. 121, pp. 25:1–25:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
Fraigniaud, P., Gall, F.L., Nishimura, H., Paz, A.: Distributed quantum proofs for replicated data. In: 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS). LIPIcs, vol. 185, pp. 28:1–28:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
Fraigniaud, P., Montealegre, P., Rapaport, I., Todinca, I.: A meta-theorem for distributed certification. In: Parter, M. (ed.) SIROCCO 2022. LNCS, vol. 13298, pp. 116–134. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09993-9_7
Fraigniaud, P., Patt-Shamir, B., Perry, M.: Randomized proof-labeling schemes. Distrib. Comput. 32(3), 217–234 (2019)
Ginosar, Y., Holzman, R.: The majority action on infinite graphs: strings and puppets. Discret. Math. 215(1–3), 59–71 (2000)
Goles, E., Montealegre, P.: Computational complexity of threshold automata networks under different updating schemes. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 559, 3–19 (2014)
Goles, E., Montealegre, P.: The complexity of the majority rule on planar graphs. Adv. Appl. Math. 64, 111–123 (2015)
Goles, E., Montealegre, P., Perrot, K., Theyssier, G.: On the complexity of two-dimensional signed majority cellular automata. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 91, 1–32 (2018)
Goles, E., Montealegre, P., Salo, V., Törmä, I.: Pspace-completeness of majority automata networks. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 609, 118–128 (2016)
Goles-Chacc, E., Fogelman-Soulié, F., Pellegrin, D.: Decreasing energy functions as a tool for studying threshold networks. Discret. Appl. Math. 12(3), 261–277 (1985)
Göös, M., Suomela, J.: Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing. Theory Comput. 12(1), 1–33 (2016)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3) (2002)
Heider, F.: Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psychol. 21(1), 107–112 (1946)
Kelman, H.C.: Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolut. 2(1), 51–60 (1958)
Kol, G., Oshman, R., Saxena, R.R.: Interactive distributed proofs. In: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 255–264. ACM (2018)
Korman, A., Kutten, S., Peleg, D.: Proof labeling schemes. Distrib. Comput. 22(4), 215–233 (2010)
Kushilevitz, E.: Communication complexity. In: Advances in Computers, vol. 44. Elsevier (1997)
Mobilia, M., Redner, S.: Majority versus minority dynamics: phase transition in an interacting two-state spin system. Phys. Rev. E 68, 046106 (2003)
Moore, C.: Majority-vote cellular automata, ising dynamics, and p-completeness. J. Stat. Phys. 88, 795–805 (1997)
Naor, M., Parter, M., Yogev, E.: The power of distributed verifiers in interactive proofs. In: 31st ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 1096–115. SIAM (2020)
Nguyen, V.X., **ao, G., Xu, X.J., Wu, Q., **a, C.Y.: Dynamics of opinion formation under majority rules on complex social networks. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 456 (2020)
Vieira, A.R., Crokidakis, N.: Phase transitions in the majority-vote model with two types of noises. Phys. A 450, 30–36 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maldonado, D., Montealegre, P., Ríos-Wilson, M., Theyssier, G. (2024). Local Certification of Majority Dynamics. In: Fernau, H., Gaspers, S., Klasing, R. (eds) SOFSEM 2024: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14519. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52113-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52113-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52112-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52113-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)