Boredom as a Propositional Attitude: Reading Alberto Moravia with Hegel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fictional Worlds and the Political Imagination
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

This paper brings together the Italian Existentialist author Alberto Moravia’s novel Boredom and Hegel’s account of empirical cognition from the Philosophy of Spirit. I use analysis of Moravia’s text as a jum** off point for arguing that Hegel’s theory of empirical cognition offers a proto-existentialist model for understanding both the complex way in which our political lives intersect with our perceptual lives and the special role that works of imaginative fiction play in bringing this relationship to light. In Boredom, main character Dino is afflicted with a chronic case of the titular condition, which he describes as “a malady affecting external objects and consisting of a withering process; an almost instantaneous loss of vitality.” Using a Hegelian lens, I argue that, in Dino’s case, boredom is not simply a contingent psychological situation; rather, this affect describes a structure of mental intentionality, a propositional attitude, that reflects the political circumstances of 1960s post-Fascist Italy in which he is embedded. I conclude with a discussion of Hegel’s account of imagination that shows how Hegel’s text provides a technical compliment to Moravia’s literary depiction of the political character of perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See especially Franco Berardi, The Soul at Work: From Alienation to Autonomy, (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2009).

  2. 2.

    I use ‘idealist’ in a narrow sense here to refer to Kantian and post-Kantian idealisms that view apperceptive unity to be of central philosophical importance.

  3. 3.

    Due in large part to thinkers like Stanley Cavell, Martha Nussbaum, and Bernard Williams in a more general context, and thinkers like Axel Honneth and Robert Pippin in the more specifically Hegelian context.

  4. 4.

    Alberto Moravia, Boredom (New York: New York Review, 2005). Cited henceforth as [B].

  5. 5.

    René Descartes, Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Donald Cress, (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1998), p. 69.

  6. 6.

    Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism, trans. Benson Mates, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), I. 4.

  7. 7.

    It is a point of contention in the literature whether or not someone in this condition ought properly to be described as holding a belief. Burnyeat (1980) and Barnes (1982) argue against, Fine (2000) argues in favor. For my purposes, I follow Fine. See Jonathan Barnes, “The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, N.S. 28: 1–29 (1982); Myles Burnyeat, “Can the Sceptic Live His Scepticism?”, in M. Schofield, M. F. Burnyeat, and J. Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), 20–53; and Gail Fine, “Sceptical Dogmata: Outlines of Pyrrhonism I 13”, Methexis 12: 81–105 (2000).

  8. 8.

    These two sentences respectively exemplify two versions of the paradox, the omissive and the commissive. The distinction is worth noting but will not concern us here.

  9. 9.

    Quoted in Mitchell Green and John Williams, Moore’s Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007), p. 3. My emphases.

  10. 10.

    Ludwig Wittgenstein, Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Volume I (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), p. 92, §478.

  11. 11.

    Alberto Moravia, Man as an End (London: Secker & Warburg, 1965), p. 167.

  12. 12.

    Moravia, Man as End, p. 9.

  13. 13.

    Moravia, Man as End, p. 12.

  14. 14.

    George Talbot, “Alberto Moravia and Italian Fascism: Censorship, Racism and Le ambizioni sbagliate” in Modern Italy, 11:2, 127–145, 2006.

  15. 15.

    See David Gutherz, Dissertation Draft, (University of Chicago, 2019).

  16. 16.

    Berardi, The Soul at Work, pp. 109–10.

  17. 17.

    More than twenty of Moravia’s novels were adapted as feature-length films. Most famous among these adaptations are Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Conformist (1970, based on Moravia’s 1951 Il conformista) and Jean-Luc Godard’s Contempt (1963, based on Moravia’s 1954 Il desprezza).

  18. 18.

    Axel Honneth, “Work and Instrumental Action” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy (New York: SUNY Press, 1995), p. 19.

  19. 19.

    Honneth, “Work and Instrumental Action”, p. 20.

  20. 20.

    All citations from G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of Mind: Being Part Three of the “Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences” (1830), trans. William Wallace (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003). Henceforth cited as [PhilS]. German versions from http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Hegel,+Georg+Wilhelm+Friedrich/Enzyklop%C3%A4die+der+philosophischen+Wissenschaften+im+Grundrisse/Dritter+Teil%3A+Die+Philosophie+des+Geistes [Accessed March, 2023].

  21. 21.

    For an overview of the positions involved, see Luca Corti, “Hegel’s Later Theory of Cognition: An Additive or Transformative Model?”, Hegel Bulletin, 43/2, 167–193 (2021).

  22. 22.

    My translation.

  23. 23.

    My translation („freies Verknüpfen und Subsumieren dieses Vorrats unter den ihr eigentümlichen Inhalt“).

  24. 24.

    G. W. F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977). Cited as [PhS].

  25. 25.

    Hegel, G. W. F.. The Encyclopaedia Logic, with the Zusätze: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze. Ed. Théodore F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1991). Cited as [EL].

References

  • Barnes, Jonathan. “The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, N.S. 28: 1–29, 1982. Reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede 1997: 58–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, Franco. The Soul at Work: From Alienation to Autonomy. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnyeat, M. F. “Can the Sceptic Live His Scepticism?” in M. Schofield, M. F. Burnyeat, and J. Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 20–53, 1980. Reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede 1997: 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti, Luca. “Hegel’s Later Theory of Cognition: An Additive or Transformative Model?”, Hegel Bulletin, 43/2, 167–193, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Donald Cress, Indiannapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Gail. “Sceptical Dogmata: Outlines of Pyrrhonism I 13”, Methexis 12: 81–105, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutherz, David. Dissertation Draft, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Mitchell S.., & Williams, J. N. Moore’s Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. The Encyclopaedia Logic, with the Zusätze: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze. Ed. Théodore F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.. The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.. The Phenomenology of Spirit, . Philosophy of Mind: Being Part Three of the “Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences” (1830), trans. William Wallace, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, New York: SUNY Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravia, Alberto. Boredom. New York: New York Review, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Man as End, London: Secker & Warburg, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empricus. Outlines of Pyrrhonism, trans. Benson Mates, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, George. “Alberto Moravia and Italian Fascism: Censorship, Racism and Le ambizioni sbagliate”, Modern Italy, 11:2, 127-145, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology: Volume I, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliza Starbuck Little .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Little, E.S. (2024). Boredom as a Propositional Attitude: Reading Alberto Moravia with Hegel. In: Hagberg, G.L. (eds) Fictional Worlds and the Political Imagination. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52026-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation