Organizational Learning Versus Individual Learning in the Organization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Learning as Relational Governance

Part of the book series: Relational Economics and Organization Governance ((REOG))

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter critically discusses the existing literature on organizational learning. This critical analysis aims to provide evidence for the argument that, in mainstream literature, organizational learning has been conceptualized mainly in terms of individual learning and as an intra-organizational process. This focus on individual learning led to epistemological and ontological problems, to a paradox of organizational learning (does the organization really learn? Or is it only a metaphor?) and hinders a conceptualization of organizational learning as learning by the organizational entity. The focus on intra-organizational processes led to a view of learning processes that focused mainly on the institutional boundaries of the organization. Although in recent decades the inter-organizational level has been included in the literature debate and has also developed as a distinct stream, there are still problems in shifting the level of analysis of organizational learning to the network (or stakeholder nexus) level. Both the influence of individual learning and the intra-organizational focus hinder a conceptualization of organizational learning as learning in an organization conceptualized as a nexus of stakeholder resources and interests that form a distinct entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This view of individuals as agents of organizational learning is based on individualism as a meta-theoretical basis that treats the collective as the results of individual agents (Ritzer & Gindoff, 1992).

  2. 2.

    Some scholars argue that learning and cognitive development is a social process in its nature and therefore do not distinguish the cognitive from the social development. For an overview of this perspective, please see Schutt (2015), Pescosolido (2015), Henrich (2004), Vygotsky (1978), Salomon and Perkins (1998), Mead (1934).

  3. 3.

    Morandin et al. (2021) point out that the literature ignores the social aspect in favour of an individual dimension.

References

  • Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past present and future. Management Learning, 42(4), 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 4(2), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1995). Action science and oganizational learning. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Revista Espanola De Investigaciones Sociologicas, No., 77(78), 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapuji, H., & Crossan, M. M. (2004). From questions to answers: Reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning, 35(4), 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barao, A., Vasconcelos, J. B., Rocha, A., & Pereira, R. (2017). A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 735–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeby, M., & Booth, C. (2000). Networks and inter-organizational learning: A critical review. The Learning Organization, 7(2), 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, P. (2019). A network perspective on organizational learning research in tourism and hospitality: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(7), 2602–2625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010). Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organizational Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2019). Strategic alliances: An essential weapon in the growth arsenal. Retrieved December 17, 2020 from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/mergers-acqisitions/us-strategic-alliance.pdf

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Science, 14(3), 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations, 50(9), 1085–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., & Moingeon, B. (1998). From organizational learning to learning organization. Management Learning, 29(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning: The “Third Way”. In: 5th international conference “Organizational Learning and Knowledge”, 30th May–2nd June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2007). From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: The contribution of activity theory. Journal of Workplaces Learning, 19(6), 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J., Sune, A., & Albers, S. (2017). Network learning: Episodes of interorganizational learning towards a collective performance goal. European Management Journal, 35, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 489–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economics Behaviours & Organization, 53, 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, M. (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 1042–1629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, Fall (pp. 37–50).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimecki, R., & Laßleben, H. (1998b). What causes organizations to learn? In 3rd international conference on organizational learning, 6–8th June 1999; Lancaster University (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L. (2002). Network learning: Exploring learning by interorganizational networks. Human Relations, 55(4), 427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In: S.J. Armstrong, and C. Fukami (Eds.), Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 42–68). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2018). Strategic alliances: A real alternative to M&A? Driving growth through strategic alliances. Retrieved December 17, 2020 from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2018/01/ie-strategic-alliances-a-real-alternative-to-ma.pdf

  • Kumar, R., & Das, T. K. (2010). Strategic alliances and culture in a globalizing world. In J. Ulijn, G. Duysters, and E. Meijer (Eds.), Strategic alliances, mergers and acquisitions: The influence of culture on successful cooperation (pp. 13–29). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, T. P. P. (2012). Collaborative strategy—The way forward in alliances and joint ventures: A concept note. The IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 9(2), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliance. Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pennec, M., & Raufflet, E. (2018). Value creation in inter-organizational collaboration: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, 148(4), 817–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, N. S., & Asahi, M. (1995). Cross-national alliances and interorganizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 24(2), 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Friedman, V. J. (2002). A multifacet model of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 78–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. H. S. (2018). Examining social capital, organizational learning and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice. Tourism Management, 64, 258–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and explotation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind. Self & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandin, G., Russo, M., & Bergami, M. (2021). Imagining the newcomer-supervisor relationship: Future relational self in the workplace. Human Resource Management Journal, 31, 1010–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Hirotaka, T. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1998). The knowledge creating company. In Harvard business review on knowledge management (pp. 21–45). Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, M. R. (2019). Collective learning in organizations—Opportunities and constrains: Case study of an avalanche blocking a railway line. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 10(3), 332–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practices: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, B. A. (2015). Linking the social brain to the social world through network connections. In R. K. Schutt, L. J. Seidman, & M. S. Keshavan (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Brain, mind, and society (pp. 247–279). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(2), 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning. Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility. Management Learning, 31(2), 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prange, C., & Mayrhofer, U. (2015). Alliances and joint ventures. In C.L. Cooper, M. Vodosek, D.N. Hartog, and J.M. McNett (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashford, N. S., Coghlan, D. (1994). The dynamics of organizational level: A change framework for managers and consultants. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Gindoff, P. (1992). Methodological relationism: Lessons for and from social psychology. Social Psychological Quarterly, 55(2), 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, R. K. (2015). The social brain in a social world. In R. K. Schutt, L. J. Seidman, & M. S. Keshavan (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Brain, mind, and society (pp. 231–246). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F., & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67, 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline. The art & practices of the learning organization. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K. (2011). Leadership & organizational learning in knowledge management practices in global organizations. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(2), 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W. (1979). Organizational conflict. In: S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behaviour (pp. 151–181). Grid Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thygeson, N. M., Logan, C., Lindberg, C., Potts, J., Suchman, A., Merchant, R., & Thompson, R. (2021). Relational interventions for organizational learning: An experience report. Learning Healthy Systems, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortorella, G. L., Vergara, A. M. C., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020). Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufactures. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 284–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitler, K. A. (2014). Why strategic alliances fail: New CMO council report. Forbes. Retrieved December 17, 2020 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimberlywhitler/2014/10/24/why-strategic-alliances-fail-new-cmo-council-report/?sh=209596bf2789

  • Wieland, J. (2014a). The firm as a nexus of stakeholders. In: J. Wieland (Ed.), Governance ethics: Global value creation, economic organizations and normativity: Ethical economy 48 (pp. 105–120). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2020). Relational economics. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2022). Relational economics: Theoretical framework and managerial implications—A short introduction. In L. Biggiero, D. De Jongh, J. Wieland, A. Zicari, & D. Fischer (Eds.), The relational view of economics (pp. 17–41). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiewiora, A., Chang, A., & Smidt, M. (2020). Individual, project and organizational learning flows within a global project-based organization: Exploring what, how and who. International Journal of Project Management, 38, 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 26, 809–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Caniels, M. C. J. (2018). Supply chain integration through managning inter-organizational learning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Geraldo Schwengber .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geraldo Schwengber, J. (2024). Organizational Learning Versus Individual Learning in the Organization. In: Organizational Learning as Relational Governance. Relational Economics and Organization Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52015-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation