SpringerLink
Log in

Einschneidende Maβnahmen: Massenmedien und der wachsende Wunsch junger Frauen und Mädchen nach kosmetischer Genitalchirurgie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scham 4.0

  • 506 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Frauen und Mädchen sind seit jeher mit unrealistischen, unerreichbaren Körperbildnormen konfrontiert. Zusätzlich ist der „ideale weibliche“ Körper in den letzten Jahrhunderten und Jahrzehnten in ständigem Wandel gewesen. Durch die Verbreitung des Internets sind Frauen und Mädchen durchgehend mit Ratschlägen aus heteronormativen Diskursen über das Frausein konfrontiert. Die Nachfrage nach kosmetischen Eingriffen hat dramatisch zugenommen und steigt weiter an. In jüngster Zeit hat sich die Aufmerksamkeit von Frauen und Mädchen darauf verschoben, wie sie die Ästhetik ihrer Schamlippen „verbessern“, ihre Vagina „optimieren“ und ihre Vulva generell „gesünder“ machen sollten, was zu einer wachsenden Beliebtheit der kosmetischen Chirurgie im weiblichen Genitalbereich geführt hat. Die Befürworter von chirurgischen Eingriffen behaupten (fälschlicherweise), dass es sich um selbstbestimmte Methoden zur Selbstverwirklichung handelt, und versprechen eine ‚Optimierung‘, die über den Einfluss des Individuums hinausgeht. Das Marketing für diese Eingriffe basiert auf Schamgefühlen und wird als aggressiv beschrieben. Unser postmodernes Zeitalter bringt neue Visionen eines erwünschten Körperbildes und eine Zunahme der internetbasierten digitalen Verbindungen zwischen den Menschen mit sich. Das bedeutet, dass neue „Normen“ für das Körperbild sofort verbreitet und verändert werden und dass das Körperbild ständig hinterfragt und mit Scham assoziiert wird. In Verbindung mit der zunehmenden Zugänglichkeit von Nacktheit und pornografischem Material im Internet und den vorherrschenden Assoziationen von Scham und Tabuisierung der weiblichen Genitalien sind die Folgen insbesondere für die Wahrnehmung des Körperbildes durch junge Frauen drastisch. In diesem Kapitel wird die Rolle des Internets bei dem jüngsten Wunsch junger Frauen und Mädchen nach kosmetischen Genitaloperationen erörtert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alsop, R., & Lennon, K. (2018). Aesthetic surgery and the expressive body. Feminist Theory, 19(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashikali, E. M., Dittmar, H., & Ayers, S. (2016). Adolescent girls’ views on cosmetic surgery: A focus group study. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 112–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashong, A. C., & Batta, H. E. (2013). Sensationalising the female pudenda: An examination of public communication of aesthetic genital surgery. Global Journal of Health Science, 5(2), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askegaard, S., Gertsen, M. C., & Langer, R. (2002). The body consumed: Reflexivity and cosmetic surgery. Psychology & Marketing, 19(10), 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Chengeni, R. (2017). Consideration of cosmetic surgery as part of women’s benefit-provisioning mate retention strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, I. (2011). Rettet die scham! Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 24(3), 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbara, G., Facchin, F., Meschia, M., & Vercellini, P. (2015). “The first cut is the deepest”: A psychological, sexological and gynecological perspective on female genital cosmetic surgery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(9), 915–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, R. (2002). Invisible labia: The representation of female external genitals in women’s magazines. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(2), 187–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, R., Morland, C., & Garden, A. S. (2007). Expectations and experience of labial reduction: A qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114(12), 1493–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2005). In search of (better) sexual pleasure: Female genital ‘cosmetic’ surgery. Sexualities, 8(4), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2009). The women are doing it for themselves’: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female genital ‘cosmetic surgery’. Australian Feminist Studies, 24(60), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2010). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(7), 1393–1407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2015). Female genital cosmetic surgery. In A. Bolin & P. Whelehan (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of human sexuality (S. 372–373). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2019). Selling a perfect vulva? Selling a ‘normal’ vulva! In S. M. Creighton & L.-M. Liao (Hrsg.), Female genital cosmetic surgery: Solution to what problem? (S. 23–32). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Wilkinson, S. (2001). Socio-cultural representations of the vagina. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 19(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, R., & Cardozo, L. (2008). Cosmetic vulvovaginal surgery. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 18(10), 285–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clerico, C., Lari, A., Mojallal, A., & Boucher, F. (2017). Anatomy and aesthetics of the labia minora: The ideal vulva? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 41(3), 714–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craker, N., & March, E. (2016). The dark side of Facebook®: The dark tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, R. J., Pruzinsky, T., & Persing, J. A. (2007). The influence of plastic surgery “reality TV” on cosmetic surgery patient expectations and decision making. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(1), 316–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1995). Resha** the female body: The dilemma of cosmetic surgery. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbeleir, J. M. L. C. L., Van Landuyt, K., & Monstrey, S. J. (2011). Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 25(2), 130–141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. S., McDonald, K., Kirkman, M., Souter, K., & Fisher, J. (2017). Invisible labour? Tensions and ambiguities of modifying the ‘private’ body: The case of female genital cosmetic surgery. In A. S. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Hrsg.), Aesthetic labour: Rethinking beauty politics in neoliberalism (S. 351–367). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, C., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferriera, C., & Batista, D. (2015). Body image as a source of shame: A new measure for the assessment of the multifaceted nature of body image shame. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 22(6), 656–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. (2019). FGM: Surgeons who do cosmetic genital surgery may risk prosecution. BMJ, 367(16094), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperlein, E., & Anderson, I. (2016). Man vs. Vagina – A Foucauldian analysis of men’s discourses about the perfect vagina and female genital grooming. Psychology of Women Section Review, 18(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essén, B., & Johnsdotter, S. (2004). Female genital mutilation in the West: Traditional circumcision versus genital cosmetic surgery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83(7), 611–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahs, B. (2014). Genital panics: Constructing the vagina in women’s qualitative narratives about pubic hair, menstrual sex, and vaginal self-image. Body Image, 11(3), 210–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12, 82–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, E. K. (2011). Tilting the ethical lens: Shame, disgust, and the body in question. Hypatia, 26(3), 633–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaznavi, H., & Taylor, L. D. (2015). Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: An analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image, 14, 54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gimlin, D. (2000). Cosmetic surgery: Beauty as commodity. Qualitative Sociology, 23(1), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. P. (2009). Female cosmetic genital surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 113(1), 154–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. P. (2011). Female genital cosmetic and plastic surgery: A review. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(6), 1813–1825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, F. J. (2005). From clitoridectomies to ‘designer vaginas’: The medical construction of heteronormative female bodies and sexuality through female genital cutting. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 7(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. (2018). Vagina dialogues: Theorizing the ‘designer vagina’. In G. Griffin & M. Jordal (Hrsg.), Body, migration, re/constructive surgeries (S. 192–208). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, C., Hayes, J., Simonis, M., & Temple-Smith, M. (2016). ‘Everything’s neatly tucked away’: Young women’s views on desirable vulval anatomy. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(12), 1363–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, H., Sommer, V., & Jordan, F. M. (2010). Visual depictions of female genitalia differ depending on source. Medical Humanities, 36(2), 75–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesia, C. B., Yurteri-Kaplan, L., & Alinsod, R. (2013). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A review of techniques and outcomes. International Urogynecology Journal, 24(12), 1997–2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. (2018a). Latest international study shows global rise in cosmetic surgery. ISAPS Press Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. (2018b). ISAPS year-to-year comparisons: 2017 vs. 2016. ISAPS Press Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2010). Genitals and ethnicity: The politics of genital modifications. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2008). Skintight: An anatomy of cosmetic surgery. Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2017). Expressive surfaces: The case of the designer vagina. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(7–8), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B., & Foster, C. (2012). Should female genital cosmetic surgery and genital piercing be regarded ethically and legally as female genital mutilation? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119(4), 389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, T. (2008). Breast augmentation surgery: Carving the flesh as female. In V. Burr & J. Hearn (Hrsg.), Sex, violence and the body (S. 34–52). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koning, M., Zeijlmans, I. A., Bouman, T. K., & van der Lei, B. (2009). Female attitudes regarding labia minora appearance and reduction with consideration of media influence. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 29(1), 65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, H. E. (1976). Parental mislabeling of female genitals as a determinant of penis envy and learning inhibitions in women. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 24, 269–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., & Creighton, S. M. (2007). Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: How should healthcare providers respond? BMJ, 334(7603), 1090–1092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., & Creighton, S. M. (2011). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A new dilemma for GPs. British Journal of General Practice, 61(582), 7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., & Creighton, S. M. (2019). Female genital cosmetic surgery: Solution in pursuit of problem. In S. M. Creighton & L. M. Liao (Hrsg.), Female genital cosmetic surgery: Solution to what problem? (S. 1–10). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., Taghinejadi, N., & Creighton, S. M. (2012). An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery. BMJ Open, 2(6), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J., Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Liao, L.-M., & Creighton, S. M. (2005). Female genital appearance: ‘Normality’ unfolds. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 112(5), 643–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magli, I. (2007). Il mulino di Ofelia: Uomini e Dei [The mill of Ophelia: Men and God]. Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli – Alta Fedeltà.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manago, A. M., Ward, M. L., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72(1–2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markey, C. N., & Markey, P. M. (2009). Correlates of young women’s interest in obtaining cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 61(3–4), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michala, L. (2019). Clinical evidence of the effects of female genital cosmetic surgery. In L.-M. Liao & S. M. Creighton (Hrsg.), Female genital cosmetic surgery: Solution to what problem? (S. 51–57). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2013). Selling genital cosmetic surgery to healthy women: A multimodal discourse analysis of Australian surgical websites. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1991). Woman and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women’s bodies. Hypatia, 6(3), 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, H., McDonald, K., Dobson, A. S., Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2015). The contribution of online content to the promotion and normalisation of female genital cosmetic surgery: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Women’s Health, 15(110), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop, J. M. (2012). Reflecting on cosmetic surgery: Body image, shame and narcissism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurka, C. (2018). Female genital cosmetic surgery: Deviance, desire and the pursuit of perfection. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, G., & Endresz, N. (2015). Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest and co.: Body image and social media. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placik, O. J., & Arkins, J. P. (2014). Plastic surgery trends parallel Playboy magazine: The pudenda preoccupation. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 34(7), 1083–1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, T. I., Onguti, S. K., Ortega, G., Khoury, A. L., Onwuka, E., Bolorunduro, O. B., et al. (2011). Differential trends in racial preferences for cosmetic surgery procedures. The American Surgeon, 77(8), 1081–1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Primack, B. A., & Escobar-Viera, C. G. (2017). Social media as it interfaces with psychosocial development and mental illness in transitional age youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 26(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. C. (1981). Prehistoric Venuses: Symbols of motherhood or womanhood? Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(4), 402–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). Boobs, back-off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens’ sexting images. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2012). From vaginal exception to exceptional vagina: The biopolitics of female genital cosmetic surgery. Sexualities, 15(7), 778–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, I., & Spears Brown, C. (2019). The selfie generation: Examining the relationship between social media use and early adolescent body image. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn Delinsky, S. (2005). Cosmetic surgery: A common and accepted form of self-improvement? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2012–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Lefebvre, G., Bouchard, C., Shapiro, J., Blake, J., Allen, L., on behalf of the Clinical Practice Gynaecology Committee and the Ethics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, et al. (2013). Female genital cosmetic surgery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 35(12), 1108–1112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, S., & Wilkinson, S. (1998). Female genital mutilation and cosmetic surgery: Regulating non-therapeutic body modification. Bioethics, 12(4), 263–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverio, S. A. (2019). Reconstructing gender to transcend shame: Embracing human functionality to enable agentic and desexualised bodies. In C.-H. Mayer & E. Vanderheiden (Hrsg.), The bright side of shame: Transforming and growing through practical applications in cultural contexts (S. 149–165). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simonis, M., Manocha, R., & Ong, J. (2016). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A cross-sectional survey exploring knowledge, attitude and practice of general practitioners. BMJ Open, 6(9), e013010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. H. (2016). “You start to think you’re the only woman that must do it”: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of female pornography use within a heterosexual relationship. Unpublished dissertation. Nottingham Trent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V. (2009). Body appreciation, media influence, and weight status predict consideration of cosmetic surgery among female undergraduates. Body Image, 6(4), 315–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., & Voracek, M. (2008). Looking good: Factors affecting the likelihood of having cosmetic surgery. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 30(5), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman, P. (1999). Anchoring the (postmodern) self? Body modification, fashion and identity. Body & Society, 5(2–3), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, S. (2007). Television and the domestication of cosmetic surgery. Feminist Media Studies, 7(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., Maher, J. M., & Fraser, S. (2014). Vanity: 21st century selves. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J. (2012). Buying and selling breasts: Cosmetic surgery, beauty treatments and risk. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. (2018). Cosmetic (aesthetic) surgery national data bank. The Aesthetic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. (2017). Aesthetic genital surgery: Female genital aesthetic surgery. The Royal College Surgeons of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (2008). Female genital cosmetic surgery: Freakish or inevitable? Analysis from medical marketing, bioethics, and feminist theory. Feminism & Psychology, 18(4), 466–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggeman, M., & Slater, A. (2013). Netgirls: The internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45(6), 630–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermonth, E. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalisation of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 869–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, N., Chia, S. C., & **aomin, H. (2017). Does gender matter? Testing the influence of presumed media influence on young people’s attitudes towards cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 76(7–8), 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won Kim, J., & Chock, T. M. (2015). Body image 2.0: Associations between social grooming on Facebook and body image concerns. Computers in Human Behaviour, 48, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwier, S. (2014). “What motivates her”: Motivations for considering labial reduction surgery as recounted on women’s online communities and surgeons’ websites. Sexual Medicine, 2(1), 16–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sexualforschung, Sexualmedizin und Forensische Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Thula U. Koops

  2. School of Education, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

    Catherine Wilkinson

  3. Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA

    Grace Perry

  4. School of Childhood, Youth and Education Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Samantha Wilkinson

  5. Department of Women & Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, UK

    Sergio A. Silverio

Authors
  1. Thula U. Koops
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Grace Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samantha Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sergio A. Silverio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio A. Silverio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Claude-Hélène Mayer

  2. Global Institute for Transcultural Research, Römerberg, Deutschland

    Elisabeth Vanderheiden

  3. Universität Trent, Toronto, Canada

    Paul T. P. Wong (emeritiert)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koops, T.U., Wilkinson, C., Perry, G., Wilkinson, S., Silverio, S.A. (2024). Einschneidende Maβnahmen: Massenmedien und der wachsende Wunsch junger Frauen und Mädchen nach kosmetischer Genitalchirurgie. In: Mayer, CH., Vanderheiden, E., Wong (emeritiert), P.T.P. (eds) Scham 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52011-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52011-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52010-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52011-2

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation