Abstract
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is by definition an unbiased expert judgement, presenting possible impacts of the planned activity on the natural world. In such an assessment, environmental experts stand behind the Nature to sound a warning against possible consequences of human intervention. Impacts may affect the structure (presence/absence of species, existence of habitats) and the function (energy flow, food web alteration, seasonality disruption, life cycles) of an ecosystem (cf. the definitions of the 2010 Millenium Assessment (https://www.millenniumassessment.org), The system of goods and services provided by each ecosystem is a subject of valuation, and EIA shall indicate possible alterations there. Another approach is to define the Valued Ecosystem Components (VEC) and focus on the likely impacts they may be exposed to. An approach integrating both aspects is presented. The three main types of valuation are: (1) socioeconomic valuation, with reference to the market value of ecosystem goods and services; (2) biological valuation, presenting the intristinc value of a natural ecosystem, without reference to its human use; and (3) socio-cultural valuaton that considers the non-market value of a spiritual, educational and emotional character. An important part of the EIA is the initial risk assessment, as some VECs might be very resilient, other—extremaly vulnerable; some are able to regenerate or restore, while others are almost unrepairable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong CW, Foley NS, Tinch R, van den Hove S (2012) Services from the deep: steps towards valuation of deep sea. Ecosyst Serv 2:2–13
Clark M (2019) The development of environmental impact assessments for deep-sea mining. In: Sharma R (ed) Environmental issues of deep-sea mining. Springer, pp 447–470
Collins PC, Croot P, Carlsson J, Colaço A, Grehan A, Hyeong K, Kennedy R, Mohn C, Smith S, Yamamoto H, Rowden AA (2013) A primer for the environmental impact assessment of mining at seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Mar Policy 42:198–209
Cuvelier D, Gollner S, Jones DOB, Kaiser S, Arbizu PM, Menzel L, Mestre NC, Morato T, Pham C, Pradillon F, Purser A, Raschka U, Sarrazin J, Simon-Lledó E, Stewart IM, Stuckas H, Sweetman AK, Colaço A (2018) Potential mitigation and restoration actions in ecosystems impacted by seabed mining. Front Mar Sci 5:467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00467
Danovaro R, Fanelli E, Aguzzi J, Billet D, Carugati L, Corinaldesi C, Dell’Anno A, Gjerde K, Jamieson AJ, Kark S, McClain C, Levin L, Levin N, Ramirez-Llodra E, Ruhl H, Smith CR, Snelgrove PVR, Thomsen L, Van Dover CL, Yasuhara M (2020) Ecological variables for develo** a global deep-ocean monitoring and conservation strategy. Nat Ecol Evol 4:181–192
Durden JM, Lallier LE, Murphy K, Jaeckel A, Gjerde K, Jones DOB (2018) Environmental impact assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the area’. Mar Policy 87:194–202
Folkersen MV, Fleming CM, Hasan S (2018) The economic value of the deep sea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mar Policy 94:71–80
Gollner S, Kaiser S, Menzel L, Jones DOB, Brown A, Mestre N, van Oevelen D, Menot L, Colaço A, Canals M, Cuvelier D, Durden JN, Gebruk A, Egho GA, Haeckel M, Marcon Y, Mevenkamp L, Morato T, Pham CK, Purser A, Sanchez-Vidal A, Vanreusel A, Vink A, Martinez Arbizu P (2017) Resilience of benthic deep-sea fauna to mining activities. Mar Environ Res 129:76–101
ISBA/16/A/12/Rev.1 (2010, 26 April–7 May) Decision of the assembly of the international seabed authority relating to the regulations on prospecting and exploration for polymetallic sulphides in the area. ISBA, Kingston
ISBA/25/LTC/6/Rev.1 (2020, Mar 30) Recommendations for the guidance of contractors for the assessment of the possible environmental impacts arising from exploration for marine minerals in the area. ISBA, Kingston
ISBA/26/LTC/CRP.12 (2020, Mar 4) Standard for ISA environmental impact assessment process. ISBA, Kingston
Jones DOB, Durden JM, Murphy K, Gjerde KM, Gebicka A, Colaco A, Morato T, Cuvelier D, Billet DSM (2019) Existing environmental management approaches relevant to deep-sea mining. Mar Policy 103:172–181
Lallier LE, Maes F (2016) Environmental impact assessment procedure for deep seabed mining in the area: independent expert review and public participation. Mar Policy 70:212–219
Le Bris N, Levin LA (2020) Climate change cumulative impacts on deep-sea ecosystems. In: Baker M, Ramirez-Llodra E, Tyler P (eds) Natural capital and exploitation of the deep ocean. Oxford University Press, pp 161–182
Thurber AR, Sweetman AK, Narayanaswamy BE, Jones DOB, Ingels J, Hansman RL (2014) Ecosystem function and services provided by the deep sea. Biogeosciences 11:3941–3963
Van Dover CL (2014) Impacts of anthropogenic disturbances at deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems: a review. Mar Environ Res 102:59–72
Van Dover CL (2019) Inactive sulfide ecosystems in the deep sea: a review. Front Mar Sci 6:461
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Węsławski, J.M., Radziejewska, T., Tomczak, M. (2024). Ecosystem Valuation and Monitoring. In: Radziejewska, T., Węsławski, J.M., Tomczak, M. (eds) The Natural Environment of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51865-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51865-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51864-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51865-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)