An Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence on Sustainable Development Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Technologies and Distributed Registries for Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((LGTS,volume 64))

  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

Association of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the Sustainable Development will make India a better tomorrow and help industries of almost every sector to construct a better planet. Much attention is currently required for the steadily emerging concept of Artificial Intelligence and its wide impact upon different sectors of the society. Also, need for evaluation of its impact upon sustainable development is the need of the hour because they are both positive and negative impacts. The categorization of all the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was on the line of economic, social and environmental goals by United States in 2015. SDGs provide for the innovative and practical blueprint for understanding the positive and negative effects of AI. In the medium and long term, AI is projected to have an impact on global productivity, equality and inclusion, environmental outcomes, and a variety of other areas. AI’s reported potential consequences on sustainable development are both positive and negative. They’re also having an impact on global sustainability trends. As the AI revolution affects our world, it may announce a utopian future in which humans and machines coexist peacefully, or it may herald a nightmarish future filled with conflict, poverty, and pain. More immediately, would AI help us achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations (UN) or push us further down the road to more economic Uncertainty, environmental collapse, and societal upheaval turning out as the possible outcomes which is to be addressed as the need of the hour. The purpose of this article is also to answer these issues by examining the effects of AI-SDGs relationship and to look into the conceptual framework presented here which aids in the investigation as to which SDGs AI may be useful in attaining and which goals may be compromised as a result of increased AI use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Palomares et al. (2021), pp. 6497–6527.

  2. 2.

    Alegre Lideniro (1991), pp. 1306–1309.

  3. 3.

    Population Matters. 2021. “Population and the Sustainable Development Goals”. https://populationmatters.org/sdgs?gclid=Cj0KCQjwraqHBhDsARIsAKuGZeH57nTpQ2Eiglr1Koj9fol8HEfcYC1vcLZIKbtvkhBbODb8vFmiSrIaAnesEALw_wcB (last updated July 12, 2021).

  4. 4.

    International Institute for Sustainable Development (2020). “Sustainable Development | International Institute for Sustainable Development”. Last updated July 12, 2021. https://www.iisd.org/about-iisd/sustainable-development.

  5. 5.

    United Nations (2005). “Department of Economic and Social Affairs| Sustainable Development.” Last updated July 12, 2021 https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

  6. 6.

    The World Bank (2015). “Millennium Development Goals,” accessed July 12, 2021, https://www5.worldbank.org/mdgs/.

  7. 7.

    Sachs (2012), pp. 2206–2211.

  8. 8.

    United Nation Development Program (2020). “Sustainable Development Goals.” https://www.africa.undp.org/content/rba/en/home/sustainable-developmentgoals/background.html#:~:text=The%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals%20(SDGs,economic%20challenges%20facing%20our%20world.

  9. 9.

    UN Department of Public Information (2015). “We Can End Poverty, 2015” https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/Handout 7 - Millennium Development Goals.pdf.

  10. 10.

    Vinuesa et al. (2020), pp. 1–10.

  11. 11.

    Sætra (2021), pp. 1–19.

  12. 12.

    Negnevitsky (2005).

  13. 13.

    Jadhav (2019).

  14. 14.

    Spector (2006), pp. 1251–1253.

  15. 15.

    Shield, Nicholas (2019). “Amazon Is Introducing New Warehouse Robots.” https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-introduces-new-warehouse-robots-2019-5?IR=T.

  16. 16.

    Borukhovich, Eugene. (2015). “How Will Artificial Intelligence Change Healthcare?” https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/how-will-artificial-intelligence-change-healthcare (last updated July 15, 2021).

  17. 17.

    Paclitaxel is a chemotherapy drug used to treat ovarian, breast and non-small cell lung cancer.

  18. 18.

    Ravallion (2016), pp. 139–64.

  19. 19.

    Natural Capital Partners (2021). “Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.” https://www.naturalcapitalpartners.com/sustainable-development-goals/goal/industry-innovation-and-infrastructure.

  20. 20.

    Foer (2017).

  21. 21.

    Le Blanc (2015), pp. 176–187.

  22. 22.

    Nilsson et al. (2016), pp. 320–322.

  23. 23.

    Berenberg (2018). “Understanding the SDGs in Sustainable Investing”. Germany: Hamburg. https://www.berenberg.de/files/ESG%20News/SDG_understanding_SDGs_in_sustainable_investing.pdf.

  24. 24.

    Pelto (1987).

  25. 25.

    D’Alfonso et al. (2017), p. 796.

  26. 26.

    Thaler and Sunstein (2008).

  27. 27.

    In general, a meso-level analysis indicates a population size that falls between the micro and macro levels, such as a community or an organization. However, meso level may also refer to analyses that are specifically designed to reveal connections between micro and macro levels.

  28. 28.

    Shapiro (2017), pp. 458–460.

  29. 29.

    Buolamwini and Gebru (2018), pp. 77–91.

  30. 30.

    Chui et al. (2018).

  31. 31.

    Nwana (1990), pp. 251–277.

  32. 32.

    Müller (2016).

  33. 33.

    Zuboff (2019).

  34. 34.

    Di Vaio et al. (2020), pp. 283–314.

  35. 35.

    Pekmezovic (2018).

  36. 36.

    SDG Academy. 2020. “Affordable and Clean Energy”, https://sdgacademy.org/goal/affordable-and-clean-energy/ (last updated July 14, 2021).

  37. 37.

    Khakurel et al. (2018), p. 100.

  38. 38.

    Yigitcanlar and Cugurullo (2020), p. 8548.

  39. 39.

    Serrano (2018), pp. 134–154.

  40. 40.

    Toniolo et al. (2020).

  41. 41.

    Chancel, Lucas. (2019). “Ten Facts About Inequality in Advanced Economies” WID.world Working Paper 2019/15 https://wid.world/document/ten-facts-about-inequality-in-advanced-economies-wid-world-working-paper-2019-15/.

  42. 42.

    Floridi et al. (2018), pp. 689–707.

  43. 43.

    Dignum (2019).

  44. 44.

    Truby (2020), pp. 946–959.

  45. 45.

    European Commission (2019). “Responsible Consumption and Production | International Partnerships” July 15, 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/sdg/responsible-consumption-and-production_en.

  46. 46.

    Anderson (2017).

  47. 47.

    Nerini et al. (2019), pp. 1–7.

  48. 48.

    The Climate Reality Project (2017). “The Alliance for Climate Protection: Five Sustainable Cities Making a Difference for the Planet.” https://www.climaterealityproject.org/blog/five-sustainable-cities-making-difference-planet.

  49. 49.

    Næss (1989).

  50. 50.

    Sen, Conor. (2017). “The ‘Big Five’ Could Destroy the Tech Ecosystem”. Bloomberg. November 15, 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2017-11-15/the-big-five-could-destroy-the-tech-ecosystem.

  51. 51.

    Engström and Strimling (2020), p. 101396.

  52. 52.

    Sætra (2020), p. 101283.

  53. 53.

    Solove (2000), p. 1393.

  54. 54.

    Bender et al. (2021).

  55. 55.

    Danaher (2019).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tripathi, P., Saxena, P. (2024). An Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence on Sustainable Development Goals. In: Sannikova, L.V. (eds) Digital Technologies and Distributed Registries for Sustainable Development. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51067-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51067-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51066-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51067-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation