Abstract
Manuscripts for Springer use photo-offset printing and require special care in preparation. Please heed these guidelines carefully; technically unsuitable manuscripts will be rejected. The simplest way to follow the guidelines is to replace the text in this file with your own words – using the styles provided as far as possible. This abstract, for example, is 9-point Times New Roman and single-spaced; with 6 pts before and after each paragraph (“Abstract Body”). Papers should be structured as follows: introduction; theory/issues; methods/procedures; results; conclusions; references (replace this file’s first level-headings with this structure). The structure of short papers is flexible but must include an introduction and a discussion section. The abstract should be between 100 and 150 words.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. Elsevier Ltd 18, 47–57 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006
Biehl-Missal, B.: Business is show business: management presentations as performance. J. Manage. Stud. 48(3), 619–645 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00931.x
Brooke, J.: “SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale”. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Cambridge Dictionary.: Definition of Presentation (2020). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/presentation. Accessed 14 February 2023
Clark, C.: The impact of entrepreneurs’ oral ‘pitch’ presentation skills on business angels’ initial screening investment decisions. Ventur. Cap. 10(3), 257–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060802151945
Craig, R.J., Amernic, J.H.: PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innov. High. Educ. 31(3), 147–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9017-5
Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
Estrada, C.A., Patel, S.R., Talente, G., Kraemer, S.: The 10-minute oral presentation: what should I focus on? Am. J. Med. Sci. Elsevier Masson SAS 329(6), 306–309 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200506000-00010
Gordon, T.: Teaching Young Children a Second Language. Praeger, London (2007). https://doi.org/10.2167/lcc017b.0
LaViola, J.J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R.P., Bowman, D.A., Poupyrev, I.: 3D User Interfaces—Theory and Practice, 2nd Ed., Addison-Wesley (2017)
Microsoft.: “Microsoft PowerPoint” (2020). https://www.microsoft.com/de-de/microsoft-365/powerpoint. Accessed 18 May 2020
Mihelj, M., Novak, D., Beguš, S.: Virtual Reality Technology and Applications. In: Tzafestas, S.G. (ed.) Springer Science+Business Media, Dodrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6910-6
Pardes, A.: Sorry Powerpoint: The Slide Deck of the Future Will Be in AR (2017). https://www.wired.com/story/prezi-augmented-reality/. Accessed 14 February 2023
Prezi.: “Prezi” (2023). https://prezi.com/de/. Accessed 14 February 2023
PTC.: “Vuforia” (2023). https://www.ptc.com/de/products/augmented-reality/vuforia. Accessed 14 February 2023
Rauschnabel, P.A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., Alt, F.: What is XR? towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 133(May). Elsevier Ltd. (2022)
Sparks, J.R., Areni, C.S.: The effects of sales presentation quality and initial perceptions on persuasion: a multiple role perspective. J. Bus. Res. 55(6), 517–528 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00173-9
Stadler, S.: The Integration of Virtual Reality into the Design Process. Technical University of Munich (2021)
Stadler, S., Cornet, H., Frenkler, F.: Assessing heuristic evaluation in immersive virtual reality—a case study on future guidance systems. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 7(19) (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7020019
Trauth, C.: Development and Evaluation of Mixed Reality Tools for the Presentation of Public Space Information Concepts. Technical University of Munich (2020)
Unity.: “Unity” (2023). https://unity.com/. Accessed 14 February 2023
Walczak, K., Wojciechowski, R.: Dynamic creation of interactive mixed reality presentations. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST, pp. 167–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1101616.1101653
Waljee, J.F., Larson, B.P., Chang, K.W.C., Ono, S., Holland, A.L., Haase, S.C., Chung, K.C.: Develo** the art of scientific presentation. J. Hand Surg. 37(12), 2580–2588.e2 (2012). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.018
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.: The powerpoint presentation and its corollaries: how genres shape communicative action in organizations. In: Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations (2007). https://doi.org/10.2190/cpic4
Yim, M.Y.C., Park, S.Y.: I am not satisfied with my body, so I like augmented reality (AR): consumer responses to AR-based product presentations. J. Bus. Res. 100(January), 581–589. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.041
Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., Montero Montes, A.: Augmented presentations: supporting the communication in presentations by means of augmented reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(10), 829–838 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.927283
Acknowledgements
This research is based on the unpublished research of Trauth (2020). This project is part of the research program, TUMCREATE Phase 2, funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore under its Campus of Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program. The researchers would like to thank all participants of the study. The experiment was approved by the IRB of Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, No. 2019-12-029.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stadler, S., Braun, C., Frenkler, F. (2024). The Usage of Mixed Reality for Presentations: A Comparative Evaluation. In: tom Dieck, M.C., Jung, T., Kim, YS. (eds) XR and Metaverse. XR 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50559-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50559-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50558-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50559-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)