Prophetic Social Criticism, Solidarity, and Just War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religion and Social Criticism
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Richard B. Miller’s account of liberal social criticism strikingly finds in the prophetic voices of religious traditions moral resources for cultivating a community of political solidarity and for fostering resistance to political power embedded in just war morality. This chapter explores the interrelationship and tensions between liberal social criticism and prophetic moral criticism, assessing whether Miller’s observations about prophetic narratives and voices intimate that prophetic criticism contributes something to the ethics of solidarity and just war that otherwise is neglected by secular or philosophical interpretations. I examine this issue initially by providing an exposition of the ethics of prophetic moral critique, incorporating exemplary narratives in the biblical literature, which focuses on a calling of a community to moral accountability. A prophetic ethics relies on a morally thick narrative of gift, empathy, memory, and community to move communities and social structures from oppression to social justice and care for the vulnerable that contrasts with the morally thin liberal critical narrative of rights and individualism. A prophetic moral voice may thereby provide different reasons or motivations for assuming similar ethical commitments of respect and equality advocated by liberal social criticism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is but one construction of the relation of religion and ethics identified in Miller’s typology of relationships (Miller 2016: 25).

  2. 2.

    To be sure, Miller and Rorty would not agree normatively either; Rorty’s post-modernist pragmatism is not compatible with a philosophy or anthropology of human rights.

  3. 3.

    Jesus answers this question differently on other occasions. See Matthew 19:16–22; Matthew 25:31–46.

  4. 4.

    This becomes codified in subsequent rabbinic teaching through the concept of pikuach nefesh.

  5. 5.

    In contemporary ethics, the concept of “moral distress” captures the experience of witnessing wrong or injustice in the absence of an ability to prevent or correct it. The prophetic traditions knew moral distress long before moral philosophy invented the concept.

  6. 6.

    The attribution of anger and indignation to Deity raises theological questions with which Christian writers particularly struggled. Augustine for example contended that scriptural allusions to divine indignation symbolized passions aroused in the human soul by God: “God’s anger, then, is the emotion which occurs in the mind of someone who knows God’s law, when it sees that same law being transgressed by a sinner” (McCarthy 2009: 24).

  7. 7.

    The warning against false prophets occurs over 50 times in the biblical texts, over a dozen times in the Book of Mormon. Some basic references include Deuteronomy 18:20, Isaiah 9:15, Jeremiah 23:16, Matthew 7:15 and Matthew 24:11.

  8. 8.

    Miller lays these virtues out more explicitly, writing that “a critic must (1) give reasons to explain and justify [their] disapproval; (2) have (general) moral and epistemic probity; (3) exercise due diligence; (4) aspire to render a judgments that is informed by judicious perspective-taking, and (5) express [themselves] with a style and a grasp of social location that is context-sensitive” (Miller 2016: 91).

  9. 9.

    Miller refers to King’s “prophetic” discourse in discussing King’s Letter from Birmingham City Jail (Miller 2016: 304; King 1963).

  10. 10.

    This is a feature of Jeffrey Blustein’s ethics of memory: “those who bear witness might address their testimony to multiple audience, in particular to future as well as present generations” (Blustein 2008: 321).

  11. 11.

    Miller’s reliance on Augustine as an intellectual touchstone in Friends and Other Strangers (esp. 173–197, 201–227) is itself indicative of the moral intertwining of religious ideas and the project of social criticism.

  12. 12.

    The civic virtue requirement of public deliberation about war is most closely interrelated to the public reasoning virtue of the social critic, be that a citizen, a public intellectual, a policy-maker or a political leader.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney S. Campbell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Campbell, C.S. (2024). Prophetic Social Criticism, Solidarity, and Just War. In: Ranganathan, B., Anglim, C. (eds) Religion and Social Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48659-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation