Abstract
Representation of state architecture is directly controlled by the political power symbolizing the different state personalities and how they communicate it. Globally, colonial architecture was characterized by the commemoration of heroes of First and Second World Wars. In the greater part of Africa, state buildings and spaces were named in honour of knighted personalities coming out of those battles. Actually, the Europeans went as far as changing the names of ancient kingdoms and states. In the case of Zimbabwe, most of the star or historic buildings owned or controlled by the colonial government were named after leaders of the British-led Pioneer Column, under the famous Cecil John Rhodes in the late nineteenth century. At independence, in 1980, the new Zimbabwe government pursued a decolonization path of place (re)naming that memorialized and commemorated immortalized leaders of the struggle against colonialism including pan-African leaders who had provided both political and material support to the success of the struggle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agere, H. (2017, June 11). Stoddard hall – An unvalued ‘gem’. Sunday Mail. Zimpapers Group.
Alaily-Mattar, N., Bartmanski, D., Koch, M., Löw M et al. (2018).Situating architectural performance: “Star architecture” and its roles in repositioning the cities of Graz, Lucerne and Wolfsburg. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1-27. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1465896
Atto, F. N. S. (2009). Sovereign architecture: The enigma of power in the age of globalization. The Global Studies Journal, 9, 1–19.
Besada, H., & Moyo, N. (2008). Picking up the pieces of Zimbabwe’s economy (Technical Paper No. 5/2008). Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI).
Bratton, M., & Masunungure, E. (2011). The anatomy of political predation: Leaders, elites and coalitions in Zimbabwe 1980–2010 (Research Paper 09). Developmental Leadership Program (ALP).
Brittain-Catlin, T. (2014). Bleak houses: Disappointment and failure in architecture. MIT Press.
Cartier-Bresson, J. (2004). The challenge of poor governance and corruption. Copenhagen consensus 2004 project. Cambridge University Press.
Central Statistics Office. (2008). National accounts statistics. Government of Zimbabwe.
Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI). (2009). CZI 009 survey results analysis summary. CZI.
Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications.
Dawson, M. (2016). Social theory for alternative societies. Palgrave.
Dewidar, K. (2017, March). Postmodern architecture theory and practice (Working paper). British University in Egypt. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.1125.656
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformations. Princeton University Press.
Fu, A. S. (2021). Can buildings be racist? A critical sociology of architecture and the built environment. Sociological Inquiry, 92(2), 1–24.
Gallagher, J., Mpere, D. L., & N’djoré, Y. A. B. (2021). State aesthetics and state meanings: Political architecture in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. African Affairs, 120(480), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adab018
Gravari-Barbas, M., & Renard-Delautre, C. (2015). Starchitecture(s): Celebrity architects and urban space. L’Harmattan.
Grinceri, D.(2016). Architecture as cultural and political discourse: Case studies of conceptual norms and aesthetic practices. London: Routledge
Jarrett, R. (2020). Decolonization of Zimbabwean museums: The movement toward practices informed by indigenous cultures. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology.
Jenkins, C. (2005). The iconic building: The power of the enigma. Frances Lincoln.
Jones, P. (2020). Architectute, time, and cultural politics. Cultural Sociology, 14(1), 61-79.
Kern, L. (2020). Feminist city: Claiming space in a man-made world. Verso.
Kerr, R., Robinson, S. K., & Elliott, C. (2016). Modernism, postmodernism and corporate power: Historicising the architectural typology of the corporate campus. Management and Organizational History, 11(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2016.1141690
Knoblauch, H., & Löw, M. (2020). The re-figuration of spaces and refigured modernity: Concept and diagnosis. Historical Social Research, 45(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.45.2020.2.263-292
Kotnik, T. (2010). Digital architectural design as exploration of computable functions. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8(1), 1–16.
Kramarenko, V., Engstrom, L., Verdier, G., Fernandez, G., Oppers, S. E., Hughes, R., McHugh, J., & Coats, W. (2010). Zimbabwe: Challenges and policy options after hyperinflation. International Monetary Fund.
Lasswell, H. D. (2017). The signature of power: Buildings, communications, and policy. Routledge.
Light, D., & Young, C. (2018). The politics of toponymic continuity: The limits of change and the ongoing lives of street names. In D. Rose-Redwood, D. Alderman, & M. Azaryahu (Eds.), The political life of urban streetscapes: Naming, politics and place (pp. 185–201). Routledge.
Mamvura, Z. (2021). “Where art thou?” Ethnocracy, toponymic silence and toponymic subjugation in the Harare commemorative landscapes during the Mugabe era (1980–2017). Urban Forum, 32, 17–31.
Maunganidze, L. (2016). Zimbabwe: Institutionalized corruption and state fragility. In D. Olowu & P. Charnie (Eds.), State fragility and state building in Africa: Cases from eastern and southern Africa (pp. 39–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20642-4_3
Moses, K. L. (2020). Indigeneity, contingency and cognitive shifts. Ardeth, 6, 121–134.
Muñoz, S. (2007). Central Bank quasi-fiscal losses and high inflation in Zimbabwe: A note (IMF working paper, 07/98, 1–22). IMF.
Norell, D. (2016). Taming the erratic: Representation and materialization in post digital architectural design (Licentiate Thesis No. 3). KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture.
Pikirayi, I. (2006). The kingdom, the power and forevermore: Zimbabwe culture in contemporary art and architecture. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32(4), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070600995681
Raftopoulos, B. (2010). The global political agreement as a ‘passive revolution’: Notes on contemporary politics in Zimbabwe. The Round Table, 99(411), 705–718.
Sarkar, J. (2008). Tracing state fragility and trap** the panacea: Case studies of Afghanistan and Zimbabwe. In S. Menon (Ed.), Fragile states: Global perspectives (pp. 160–189). The Icfai University Press.
Schumacher, P. (2012). Dissecting the pretense of political architecture. The autopoiesis of architecture, Vol. 2: A new agenda for architecture. John Wiley & Sons.
Simone, C. (2020). Architecture as propaganda: Exploring the Nazi Party’s use of architecture and city building as a means of indoctrination. University of Toronto.
Taṣci, M. H., & Ṣalgamcioḡlu, M. E. (2022). Politically in-correct buildings: Transmission of different power attitudes through architecture. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(2), 977–994.
Vale, L. (2008). Architecture, power and national identity. Routledge.
Vinken, G. (2021). Zones of tradition-places of identity: Cities and their heritage. Wetzlar, Verlag, Bielefeld.
Waldrep, S. (2013). The dissolution of place architecture, identity, and the body. Routledge.
Williams, R. J. (2019). Why cities look the way they do. Polity.
Yacobi, H. (2004). Form follows metaphors: A critical discourse analysis of the construction of the Israeli supreme court building in Jerusalem. The Journal of Architecture, 9(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360236042000230215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maunganidze, L. (2024). Deconstructing Iconic and Historicist State Buildings. In: Representation and Materialization of Architecture and Space in Zimbabwe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47761-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47761-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47760-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47761-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)