Applying AI & TOPSIS-MCDM Tool in Evaluating Top Five Private Indian Bank Performances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Block Chain technology and Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Financial Mathematics and Fintech ((FMF))

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

Banks play a transitional role in offering customers financial services because they are an essential part of the financial system. Therefore, managers and stakeholders must value the banking industry and its operations. In order to analyse bank performance and efficiency, this study looks at the top five private banks’ relative performance in relation to pre-established criteria from 2019 to 2023. With the aid of AI and TOPSIS algorithms, this work attempts to present a reliable and simple-to-calculate mathematical model for assessing bank performance. According to the TOPSIS ranking of banks from best to worst, it can be determined that the bank with the highest mean score is among the top three banks overall for the time period. According to the analysis of the shareholding performance of these banks, all of them are vying for high performance in the banking industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB (1997) Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. Eur J Oper Res 98:175–212. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6

  • Chuang-Min C, Ming-Miin Y, Hsiao-Ning W (2015) An application of the dynamic network DEA model: the case of banks in Taiwan. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 51(sup1):S133–S151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2014.998887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fethi MD, Pasiouras F (2009) Assessing Bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: a survey. Eur J Oper Res 204(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galankashi MR, Helmi SA, Hashemzahi P (2016) Supplier selection in automobile industry: a mixed balanced scorecard-fuzzy AHP approach. Alex Eng J 55(1):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurcan OF, Yazici I, Beyca DF, Arslan CY, Eldemir F (2016) Third party logistics (3PL) provider selection with AHP application. Proc Soc Behav Sci 235:226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Selim A, Tarique KM (2016) Prioritisation of service quality dimensions for healthcare sector. Int J Med Eng Inform 8(2):108–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Mangla SK, Kumar S, Garg D (2017) Identify and prioritise the critical factors in implementing the reverse logistics practices: a case of Indian auto component manufacturer. Int J Bus Syst Res 11(1–2):42–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek A (2015) Performance analysis of public banks in Turkey. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res 6(13):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic IB, Kankaras M (2018) DEMATEL-AHP multi-criteria decision making model for the determination and evaluation of criteria for selecting an air trafc protection aircraft. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 1(2):93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popovic M, Kuzmanović M, Savić G (2018) A comparative empirical study of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: literature review. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1802160p

  • Ratna S, Subham A, Saiuddin M (2018) Assessment of lean performance of manufacturing cells in an SME using AHP. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev (IJMPERD) 8(3):435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1995) Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering application: some challenges. Int J Ind Eng Appl Pract 2(1):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Sheng Z, ** Y, Ma X, Zhang H, Kang M, Ren F, Du Q, Ke H, Han Z (2017) The application of the analytic hierarchy process and a new correlation algorithm to urban construction and supervision using multi-source government data in Tian**. Int J Geo-Inf 7(50):3–14

    Google Scholar 

Websites References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Mohan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mohan, N., Irfan, M. (2024). Applying AI & TOPSIS-MCDM Tool in Evaluating Top Five Private Indian Bank Performances. In: Irfan, M., Muhammad, K., Naifar, N., Khan, M.A. (eds) Applications of Block Chain technology and Artificial Intelligence. Financial Mathematics and Fintech. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47324-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation