Abstract
Jakob von Uexküll’s notion of Umwelt – the subjective world of an animal – is fundamental for contemporary biosemiotics and zoosemiotics. One of the essential elements of Umwelt is time. For Uexküll, all species perceive time differently due to the differing length of their moment – a ‘slice of time’ within which an organism can perceive no distinctions. However, Uexküll’s perspective limits explorations of nonhuman temporalities to species-specific, determined, and unchangeable time, hindering the analysis of interspecific and individual, changeable, and dynamic temporalities. In this chapter, I work with the concept of ‘E-series timing’ developed by Nomura et al. (Biosemiotics 13:347–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09398-5, 2020), referring to the intersubjective time dynamically created by living organisms through joint semiosis. First, using the insights from E-series timing theory, I propose a synthetic notion of ‘moment’ that integrates Uexküll’s original definition and Kull’s (Prog Biophys Mol Biol 119(3):616–621, 2015) concept of ‘specious present’ so as to arrive at the idea of a moment with flexible length, which consists of two fundamental decisions made by the organism. Secondly, I highlight the semiotic pertinence of the notion ‘time window’ – a gap or pause between turns – by comparing the concept of E-series timing with research on turn-taking in nonhuman animal communication. Flexibilizing the length of the time window leads to a multispecies temporality via analyzable joint separation of moments. Finally, I propose E-series timing as the best analytical tool to explain temporal synchronicity, which, as Tønnessen (Semiotica 2014(198):159–180, 2014) argues, is the core of Umwelt alignment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
McTaggart, J. E. (1927). The nature of existence (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 2.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A, Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735
References
Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behavior, 24(3), 181–191.
Ferreira, M. I. A., & Gama, M. C. (2013). The concept of umwelt overlap and its application to cooperative action in multi-agent systems. Biosemiotics, 6(3), 497–514.
Kull, K. (2000). An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 326–350. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2000.28.18
Kull, K. (2015). Semiosis stems from logical incompatibility in organic nature: Why biophysics does not see meaning, while biosemiotics does. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119(3), 616–621.
Mäekivi, N., & Magnus, R. (2020). Hybrid natures – Ecosemiotic and zoosemiotic perspectives. Biosemiotics, 13, 1–7.
Miyamoto Gómez, O. (2021). Four epistemological gaps in alloanimal episodic memory studies. Biosemiotics, 14, 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09437-9
Nomura, N., Matsuno, K., Muranaka, T., & Tomita, J. (2020). Toward a practical theory of timing: Upbeat and E-series time for organisms. Biosemiotics, 13, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09398-5
Pika, S., Wilkinson, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Vernes, S. C. (2018). Taking turns: Bridging the gap between human and animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 180598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
Ribó, I. (2019a). Dialogical communicative interaction between humans and elephants: An experiment in semiotic alignment. Biosemiotics, 12(2), 305–327.
Ribó, I. (2019b). Semiotic alignment: Towards a dialogical model of interspecific communication. Semiotica, 2019(230), 247–274.
Tønnessen, M. (2014). Umwelt trajectories. Semiotica, 2014(198), 159–180.
von Uexküll, J. (1992). A stroll through the world of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391. (Original work published 1934).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Popovych, O. (2024). Interspecific Temporalities: Crafting Common Rhythms. In: Tragel, E.M. (eds) Explorations in Dynamic Semiosis. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47001-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47001-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47000-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47001-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)