SpringerLink
Log in

Rhetorical Analysis and Marketing Texts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Marketing of Service-Dominant Logic

  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

The author discusses the value of a rhetorical approach in the analysis of scholarly discourse and provides an overview of how rhetoric will be used in the study. The chapter discusses the various ways in which the rhetorical perspective has been used to deconstruct academic writing in the social sciences, including marketing, and then introduces the concepts of persuasive proof, rhetorical argumentation, rhetorical style, and kairos. The major tools of the methodology are covered with a practical focus on introducing the reader to the sort of insights and intricacies that the approach helps to uncover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle (trans. H. C. Lawson-Tancred). (1991). The Art of Rhetoric. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R. (1957). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine (trans. A. Outler). (2009). Augustine Essentials: The Complete Unabridged Texts. Revelation Insight Publication Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auxtova, K. (2019). Behind the Rhetorical Scenes of Offence: A Rhetorical Analysis of Complained-About Offensive Advertising. In E. Bigne & S. Rosengren (Eds.), Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. X, p. 229). European Advertising Academy. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995). Designing Freedom. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkenkotter, C. (1995). The Power and the Perils of Peer Review. Rhetoric Review, 13(2), 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. (1965). Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J. A. (2004). The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments. In C. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining Visual Rhetorics (pp. 41–61). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1995). The Eunuch’s Tale: Reviewing Reviewed. Journal of Marketing Management, 11(7), 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1996). Art Or Science? Fifty Years of Marketing Debate. Journal of Marketing Management, 12(4), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1999). Marketing and Literature: The Anxiety of Academic Influence. Journal of Marketing, 63(January), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2002). The Spectre of Kotlerism: A Literary Appreciation. European Management Journal, 20(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2004). Writing Marketing: The Clause That Refreshes. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3–4), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2009). Double, Double Toil and Trouble: On the Equivocal Magic of Marketing. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 8(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Stevens, L., & Maclaran, P. (1999). I Can’t Believe It’s Not Bakhtin!: Literary Theory, Postmodern Advertising, and the Gender Agenda. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Wijland, R. (2018). Figuratively Speaking: Of Metaphor, Simile and Metonymy in Marketing Thought. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1966). Language As Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capelli, S., & Jolibert, A. (2009). Metaphor’s Validity in Marketing Research. Psychology and Marketing, 26(12), 1079–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassin, B. (2014). Sophistical Practice: Toward a Consistent Relativism. Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. Z. (2015). Introducing Arabic Rhetoric. Dar Al-Nicosia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluley, R. (2016). The Depiction of Marketing and Marketers in the News Media. European Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 752–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. (1990). Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P. (2003). Metaphor as a Method in the Domain of Marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 20(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (2010). The Closeness of Close Reading. ADE Bulletin, 149, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1987). Rhetoric and Mathematics. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs (pp. 53–68). University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Romilly, J. (1975). Magic and Rhetoric in ancient Greece. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donawerth, J., Alvarez, M. L., Baden, A. G., Caulfield, J., Dove, L., Kerr, A., Lynch, W. M., Mack, E., Mason, M., Denise, D., Nelson, K., Peller, M. H., Porcarelli, P., Porter, C., Randall, R., Schoop, M., Sheehan, A., Shilling, S., & Schwenk, M. (1994). An Annotated Bibliography of the History of Non-Western Rhetorical Theory Before 1900. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 24(3/4), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, J. (2005). Rhetorical Stylistics. Language and Literature, 14(3), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, J. (2011). Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. University of Oxford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, W. (2011). Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. David R. Godine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. B. (2008). The Weight of Rhetoric: Studies in Cultural Delirium. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 41(4), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2008). Exploring Metaphor as an Alternative Marketing Language. European Business Review, 20(6), 492–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, S. (2004). Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration & Practice (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, S. (2018). Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration & Practice (5th ed.). Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, S., Foss, K., & Trapp, R. (2002). Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, S. K. (1986). Ambiguity as Persuasion: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Communication Quarterly, 34(3), 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, S. K. (2005). Theory of Visual Rhetoric. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media (pp. 163–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, M. (1997). The Attention Economy and the Net. First Monday, 2(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., Jack, G., & Haylock, B. (2019). Toward a Methodology for Analyzing Visual Rhetoric in Corporate Reports. Organizational Research Methods, 22(3), 798–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gries, L. (2015). Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guler, E. (2021). An Overview of Kut and Tore as the Pillars of the Turkish Rhetorical Tradition. In K. Lloyd (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2007). Hyper and Deep Attention: The Generational Divide in Cognitive Modes. Profession, 2007(1), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, J. (2005). The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C. (1986). Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(3), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C. (2007). Metaphor in the Marketplace. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. (1995). The Rhetoric of Research. BMJ, 310(6985), 985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews). (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgement. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (1994). A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (1997). Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical Sand Cross-Cultural Introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. (1991). A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. (2007). The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp.92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. (2021). Comparative World Rhetorics: The What and How. In K. Lloyd (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1959 [1690]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Vol. II (Alexander Campbell Fraser, Ed.). Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longaker, M., & Walker, J. (2011). Rhetorical Analysis: A Brief Guide for Writers. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006a). Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections and Refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006b). The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (2013). Classical Rhetoric and Modern Public Relations. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2014). Politics & Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzolf, M. (1978). American Studies—Ideas for Media Historians? Journalism History, 5(1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1983). The Rhetoric of Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1995). Metaphors Economists Live By. Social Research, 62(2), 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. (2016). An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication: A Western Rhetorical Perspective (9th ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (2003). Re-Inquiries: Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures Under Directed Processing Versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 579–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melfi, A. (2021). Foundations in Vedic Rhetorical Culture: Approaching Moksa Analogically. In K. Lloyd (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melfi, B. A., Khoury, N., Samra, T., Bibliographies, G., Comments, V., Carter, T., Mao, L., Sirohi, P., Salhi, A., Rabbi, S., Skinnell, R., Angeli, L., & Cox, M. (2021). An Annotated Bibliography of Global and Non-Western Rhetorics: Sources for Comparative Rhetorical Studies. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 9(June 22). https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221

  • Middleton, P. (2005). Distant Reading: Performance, Readership, and Consumption in Contemporary Poetry. University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, C. (2014). The Rhetoric of Managed Contagion: Metaphor and Agency in the Discourse of Viral Marketing. Marketing Theory, 14(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, C. (2018). Marketing, Rhetoric, and Control: The Magical Foundations of Marketing Theory. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munz, P. (1990). The Rhetoric of Rhetoric. Journal of the History of Ideas, 51(1), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. (Eds.). (1987). The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørreklit, H. (2003). The Balanced Scorecard: What Is the score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 591–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, L., Patterson, M., & Kelly-Holmes, H. (2008). Death of a Metaphor: Reviewing the ‘marketing as relationships’ Frame. Marketing Theory, 8(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, D. (2000). On the Precipice of a Revolution with Hamel and Prahalad. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1–3), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, N. (2002). Selling Terror: The Visual Rhetoric of Osama Bin Laden. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(4), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, B., & Dickinson, G. (2013). Entering the Unending Conversation: An Introduction to Rhetorical Criticism. In B. Ott & G. Dickinson (Eds.), The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism (pp. 1–14). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2002). The Development, Change, and Transformation of Rhetorical Style in Magazine Advertisements 1954–1999. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2005). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, B. (2013). The Dialectics of Citizenship: Exploring Privilege, Exclusion, and Racialization. Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiappa, E. (1990). Did Plato Coin Rhetorike? American Journal of Philology, 111(4), 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. M. (1990). Understanding **gles and Needledrop: A Rhetorical Approach to Music in Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. M. (1994a). Bridge from Text to Mind: Adapting Reader-Response Theory to Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 461–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. M. (1994b). Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R., & Brock, B. (1972). Methods of Rhetorical Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, J. I. (1996). Machines Made of Words: The Influence of Engineering Metaphor on Marketing Thought and Practice, 1900 to 1929. Journal of Macromarketing, 16(2), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing Organizations for an Information – Rich World. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest. Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. H. (2016). What Was “Close Reading”?: A Century of Method in Literary Studies. Minnesota Review, 2016(87), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2003). Rhetoric and Human Consciousness: A History. Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2009). Rhetoric, Science, and Magic in Seventeenth-Century England. Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1988). Medieval Allegory: Roots of Advertising Strategy for the Mass Market. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1990). Other-Speak: Classical Allegory and Contemporary Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1991). Who Talks Advertising? Literary Theory and Narrative “Point of View”. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1993a). The Firm, the Author, and the Persona: A Literary Model of the Source of Advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15(2), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1993b). Feminist Literary Criticism and the Deconstruction of Ads: A Postmodern View of Advertising and Consumer Responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1994). A Revised Communication Model for Advertising: Multiple Dimensions of the Source, the Message, and the Recipient. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. (1996). Textual Analysis in Advertising Research: Construction and Deconstruction of Meanings. Journal of Advertising, 25(3), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B., & Schroeder, J. E. (1994). Interpretative Methodology from Art and Literary Criticism: A Humanistic Approach to Advertising Imagery. European Journal of Marketing, 28(8/9), 114–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. L. (2000). Kee** the Rhetoric Orthodox: Forum Control in Science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadajewski, M. (2006). The Ordering of Marketing Theory: The Influence of McCarthyism and the Cold War. Marketing Theory, 6(2), 163–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuominen, P. (2007). Emerging Metaphors in Brand Management: Towards a Relational Approach. Journal of Communication Management, 11(2), 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2007). Paradigms, Pluralisms, and Peripheries: On the Assessment of the S-D Logic. Australasian Marketing Journal, 15(1), 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer Integration and Value Creation: Paradigmatic Traps and Perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). Service Dominant Logic: Prologue and Prospects. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 73(2), 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatz, R. E. (1973). The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6(3), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Koskull, C., & Fougère, M. (2011). Service Development as Practice: A Rhetorical Analysis of Customer-Related Arguments in a Service Development Project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. (2010). Develo** a Rhetorical Analysis of Racist Humour: Examining Anti-black Jokes on the Internet. Social Semiotics, 20(5), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns, H. A. (1925). The Literary Criticism of Oratory. In A. Drummond (Ed.), Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James Albert Winans. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (2021). From Oratory to Writing: An Overview of Chinese Classical Rhetoric (500 BCE - 220 CE). In K. Lloyd (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2017). The Attention Merchants. Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Media & Communication, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK

    Chris Miles

Authors
  1. Chris Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miles, C. (2023). Rhetorical Analysis and Marketing Texts. In: The Marketing of Service-Dominant Logic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46510-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation