Abstract
Globalization has driven significant developments throughout the latter decades of the twentieth century and the early decades of the twenty-first century. Education and our schools, traditionally local institutions raising individuals to serve their local economies and nations, now confront the challenge of nurturing globally competent individuals (Zhao, J Teach Educ 61(5):422–431, 2010). Moreover, although globalization profoundly influences us, there remains a relative scarcity of examination of teacher education policies and a reevaluation of science education practices in this global context. This chapter delves into the concept of globalization and its repercussions for education. While globalization offers innovative approaches and practices to enhance education, it also harbors potential pitfalls. This chapter assesses both the beneficial initiatives and the detrimental impacts of globalization on students and teacher education discussed in the existing literature. It examines the influence of globalization on science education and its subsequent reforms. The chapter underscores the imperative to integrate local knowledge and culture with global trends, thereby equip** students for the present and future world characterized by transnational interconnectivity and mobility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anastácio, R., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Pereira, M. J. (2017). Global science teaching for human well-being. Creative Education, 8(14), 2275.
Bauman, Z. (1998). On glocalization: Or globalization for some, localization for some others. Thesis Eleven, 54(1), 37–49.
Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020.
Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.
Burke, L. E. (2022). Foregrounding intersectionality in considerations of diversity: Confronting discrimination in science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1157–1170.
Caniglia, G., John, B., Bellina, L., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Cohmer, S., & Laubichler, M. D. (2018). The glocal curriculum: A model for transnational collaboration in higher education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 368–376.
Celik, S., Kardaş İşler, N., & Saka, D. (2021). Refugee education in Turkey: Barriers and suggested solutions. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.194787
Chinn, P. W. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1247–1268.
Coronel, J. M., & Gómez-Hurtado, I. (2015). Nothing to do with me! Teachers’ perceptions on cultural diversity in Spanish secondary schools. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 400–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.968896
De Wit, H. (2019). Internationalization in higher education, a critical review. SFU Educational Review, 12(3), 9–17.
DeBoer, G. E. (2011). The globalization of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 567–591.
Dhir, R. K., Cattaneo, U., Cabrera Ormaza, M., Coronado, K., & Oelz, M. (2019). Implementing the ILO indigenous and tribal peoples convention no. 169 “Towards an inclusive, sustainable and just future.” International Labour Organisation (ILO). Retrieved 7 Sept 2022, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/%2D%2D-publ/documents/publication/wcms_735607.pdf
Engel, L. C., Rutkowski, D., & Thompson, G. (2019). Toward an international measure of global competence? A critical look at the PISA 2018 framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 117–131.
Goodwin, A. L. (2010). Globalization and the preparation of quality teachers: Rethinking knowledge domains for teaching. Teaching Education, 21(1), 19–32.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., & Moore, T. (2014). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271–279.
Hamid, S. S. (2016). Transforming teacher education for the globalization of education. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(2), 70.
John, B., Caniglia, G., Bellina, L., Lang, D., & Laubichler, M. (2017). The glocal curriculum. In A practical guide to teaching and learning in an interconnected world. Tredition.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831203200346
Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78.
Leask, B., & Bridge, C. (2013). Comparing internationalisation of the curriculum in action across disciplines: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 79–101.
Lourenço, M. (2018). Internationalizing teacher education curricula: Opportunities for academic staff development. On the Horizon, 26(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-07-2017-0053
Mannion, G. (2015). Towards glocal pedagogies: Some risks associated with education for global citizenship and how glocal pedagogies might avoid them. In J. Friedman, V. Haverkate, B. Oomen, E. Park, & M. Sklad (Eds.), Going glocal in higher education: The theory, teaching and measurement of global citizenship (pp. 19–34). University College Roosevelt. ISBN: 978-94-92170-10-1.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. I. E. A. (I. A. for the E. of E. A. (2020, September). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS 2019 international report. Retrieved 4 Sept 2022, from https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2021-01/TIMSS%202019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
NCES. (2019/2020). TALIS 2018 U.S. highlights web report. U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 13 Sept 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019132
Nganga, L. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching for global mindedness and social justice: Using the 4Cs (Collaboration, Critical thinking, Creativity and Communication) in teacher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 26–57.
Niemczyk, E. K. (2019). Glocal education in practice: Teaching, researching, and citizenship (pp. 11–18). The Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners, TALIS. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Olson, J. K. (2018). The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Science & Education, 27(7), 637–660.
Organization of American States. (2016). American declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. Retrieved from https://www.narf.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2016oas-declaration-indigenous-people.pdf
Paine, L., Aydarova, E., & Syahril, I. (2017). Globalization and teacher education. The Sage handbook of research on teacher education, 2, 1133–1148.
Park Rogers, M. A., Akerson, V. A., & Buck, G. A. (2022). Science education curriculum. In D. Fisher (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of education. Taylor & Francis/Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE93-1
Parkhouse, H., Glazier, J., Tichnor-Wagner, A., & Montana Cain, J. (2015). From local to global: Making the leap in teacher education. International Journal of Global Education, 4(2), 10.
Parmigiani, D., Jones, S. L., Kunnari, I., & Nicchia, E. (2022). Global competence and teacher education programmes. A European perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2022996.
Quigley, C. (2009). Globalization and science education: The implications for indigenous knowledge systems. International Education Studies, 2(1), 76–88.
Rauschenberger, E. (2020). From teach for America to teach first: The initial expansion overseas. In Examining teach for all: International perspectives on a growing global network (Oxford studies in comparative education) (pp. 13–35). Routledge.
Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 1031–1051.
Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2020). Cultural dimension in internationalization of the curriculum in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(12), 375.
Sawir, E. (2011). Academic staff response to international students and internationalising the curriculum: The impact of disciplinary differences. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(1), 45–57.
Schleicher, A. (2022). Building on COVID-19’s innovation momentum for digital, inclusive education, International Summit on the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/24202496-en
Soudien, C. (2005). Inside but below: The puzzle of education in the global order. In International handbook on globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 501–516). Springer.
Tamer, M. (2014). The education of immigrant children. Retrieved 2 Sept from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/14/12/education-immigrant-children
TIMSS 2019 U.S. highlights web report (NCES 2021-021). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 5 Sept 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results19/index.asp
Tobin, K. (2011). Global reproduction and transformation of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 127–142.
UNHCR. (2022). UNHCR’s refugee population statistics database. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/
Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (Eds.). (2013). Teaching in tension: International pedagogies, national policies, and teachers’ practices in Tanzania (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
Walsh, B. (2015). After the journey: What U.S. educators need to know about refugee children and how to teach them. Retrieved 2 Sept from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/15/10/after-journey
Wang, J., Lin, E., Spalding, E., Odell, S. J., & Klecka, C. L. (2011). Understanding teacher education in an era of globalization. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 115–120.
World Bank. (2022). Indigenous people context. Retrieved 7 Sept from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/indigenouspeoples#1
York, M. K., & Hite, R. (2021). Preservice science and mathematics teachers’ intent to use classroom-based global collaboration (CBGC) in their future classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 48(2), 45–68.
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., Kahn, S., & Newton, M. (2016). Humanitas emptor: Reconsidering recent trends and policy in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 465–476.
Zhao, Y. (2010). Preparing globally competent teachers: A new imperative for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 422–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avsar Erumit, B., Akerson, V.L. (2023). Contemporary Efforts Involving Globalization and Science Teacher Education. In: Buck, G.A., Dimitrieska, V., Akerson, V.L. (eds) Internationalizing Rural Science Teacher Preparation. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46073-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46073-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46072-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46073-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)