The \( \mu \)SR Technique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Muon Spin Spectroscopy

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 961))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

The third chapter introduces the principles of the \(\mu \)SR technique. First, its main features that distinguish it from other so-called solid-state nuclear techniques (NMR, neutron scattering, EPR) are described in detail. We explain how information about different physical properties is obtained in a \(\mu \)SR experiment by measuring the time evolution of the spin polarization of an ensemble of muons implanted in the in the material under study. We show how this is done by detecting the anisotropically emitted decay positrons. The main components of a \(\mu \)SR spectrometer are described. Data acquisition and the different experimental setups used and their purpose (so-called zero magnetic field, transverse field and longitudinal field) are discussed. The main differences between experiments with continuous and pulsed muon beam experiments are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This acronym was coined in one of the first reviews about the use of muons in physics and chemistry (Brewer et al. 1975).

  2. 2.

    Note that NQR (Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance) is also a zero field technique, but for magnetic studies less direct than zero field \(\mu \)SR.

  3. 3.

    For an accurate determination, the muon site and magnetic structure must be known.

  4. 4.

    In decay beams, see Sect. 1.8.3 the polarization is also very high \(\sim \) 80%.

  5. 5.

    The density of muons in the sample, even with the most intense pulse, is negligibly small, so that muon-muon interactions can be completely ignored.

  6. 6.

    Sometimes called \(\Delta t\)-\(\mu \)SR.

  7. 7.

    Measurements are also performed in the so-called integral mode, where simply the number of the decay positrons in different detectors is recorded. This mode is not rate limited. It is often used in the integral avoided level crossing (ALC) or level crossing resonance (LCR) techniques (Roduner 1988), where it has been applied to determine muon and nuclei hyperfine coupling constants in molecules such as muoniated radicals or in muonium defect centers, thus allowing the characterization of the system and the assessment of its structure (Heming et al. 1986; Kiefl 1986), see also Chap. 7.

  8. 8.

    The energy-averaged efficiency is \(\epsilon =\displaystyle \int _0^1 E(\varepsilon )f(\varepsilon )\;d\varepsilon \), where \(f(\varepsilon )\) is the efficiency of the detector as a function of the scaled energy \(\varepsilon \).

  9. 9.

    The effect of a finite solid angle on the asymmetry can be written as

    $$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} A_{0,\Delta\Omega}\;\cos\theta=\frac{\bar{A}\int\limits_{\theta-\Delta\theta/2}^{\theta+\Delta\theta/2}\cos\theta'\;d\theta'}{\Delta\theta} = \bar{A}\cos\theta\;\frac{\sin{\frac{\Delta\theta}{2}}}{\frac{\Delta\theta}{2}}\;\;, \end{aligned} $$
    (3.4)

    where \(\theta \) is the observation angle between \(\mathbf {P}\) and \(\hat {\mathbf {n}}\) and \(\Delta \theta \) is the polar angle subtended by the detector.

  10. 10.

    Note that a possible reduction from the ideal value \(|\mathbf {P}(0)|=1\) is generally integrated in the asymmetry \(A_0\).

  11. 11.

    In the literature, depending on the context, the \(\mu \)SR signal (sometimes normalized to \(A_0\)) is also called asymmetry, polarization, depolarization, or relaxation signal.

  12. 12.

    Also named continuous-wave or cw-beam.

  13. 13.

    High-energy decay beams retain a signature of the proton pulse because the transported muons originate mainly from a pion cloud volume with a more or less well-defined decay time.

  14. 14.

    Note that the Larmor precession frequency of the muon spin in 10 T is 1.35 GHz.

  15. 15.

    The basics of RF resonance techniques for pulsed and continuous muon beams are described in Scheuermann et al. (1997), Cottrell et al. (2000), and Kreitzman (1991), respectively.

  16. 16.

    The high sensitivity of \(\mu \)SR requires an active compensation of the Earth’s and surrounding magnetic fields to perform ZF experiments under ideal conditions. The compensation is usually better than \(\sim 2\; \mu \)T.

  17. 17.

    Experiments can also be performed by rotating the muon spin by \(90^{\circ }\) with a spin rotator, see Sect. 1.8.4. In this case, the Up and Down detectors, Fig. 3.13, provide the relevant information.

  18. 18.

    As remarked earlier, we define backward and forward directions with respect to the incoming muon momentum. Sometimes backward and forward are defined with respect to the initial spin polarization. With a spin-unrotated surface muon beam, as in Fig. 3.9, this means swap** the labels of the positron detectors.

  19. 19.

    We will see later that the magnetic field of the nuclear moments produces a slight change in the polarization.

  20. 20.

    Note that the effect of the exponential decay due to the finite muon lifetime enters in the statistical error of the histograms and of the asymmetry. Due to the Poisson statistics, the relative error of a histogram bin has an essentially exponential growth with time t, \(\sim \exp (t/(2\tau _\mu ))\).

References

  • Abela, R., Amato, A., Baines C., et al. (1999). Hyperfine Interactions, 120, 575.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, A., Luetkens, H., Sedlak, K., et al. (2017). Review of Scientific Instruments, 88, 093301.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, J. L. (1992). Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 56, S258.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. H., Crowe, K. M., Gygax, F. N., et al. (1975). In V. W. Hughes, & C. S. Wu (Eds.), Muon Physics: Chemistry and Solids (Vol. III). Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0123606037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, S., Cox, S., Scott, C., et al. (2000). Physica B: Condensed Matter, 693, 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinu, N. (2016). In B. Nabet (Ed.), Photodetectors: Materials, Devices and Applications (Vol. 255). Woodhead Publishing. ISBN: 978-1782424451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., Brückner, F., Nikitin, A., et al. (2020). Review of Scientific Instruments, 91, 103902.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Grinenko, V., Ghosh, S., Sarkar, R., et al. (2021). Nature Physics, 17, 748–754.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heming, M., Roduner, E., Patterson, B. D., et al. (1986). Chemical Physics Letters, 128, 100.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, A. D., Aramini, M., Baker, P. J., et al. (2018). JPS Conference Proceedings, 21, 011055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, A. D., Lord, J. S., Ishida, K., et al. (2019). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 377, 20180064.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Khasanov, R., (2022). Journal of Applied Physics, 132, 190903.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Khasanov, R., Guguchia, Z., Maisuradze, A., et al. (2016). High Pressure Research, 36, 140.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefl, R. F. (1986). Hyperfine Interactions, 32, 707.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreitzman, S. R. (1991). Hyperfine Interactions, 65, 1055.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, Y., Shimomura, K., Kawamura, N., et al. (2012). Physics Procedia, 30, 46.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pobell, F. (1996). Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures. Springer. ISBN: 978-3540463566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokscha, T., Chow, K. H., Stilp, E., et al. (2013). Scientific Reports, 3, 2569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roduner, E. (1988). The Positive Muon as a Probe in Free Radical Chemistry. Lecture notes in chemistry. Springer. ISBN: 978-3540500216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuermann, R., Schimmele, L., Schmidl, J., et al. (1997). Applied Magnetic Resonance, 13, 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiroka, T., Bucci, C., De Renzi, R., et al. (1999). Physical Review Letters, 83, 4405.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Storchak, V., Brewer, J. H., & Morris G. D. (1996). Physical Review Letters, 76, 2969.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoykov, A., Scheuermann, R., Sedlak, K., et al. (2009). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research - Section A, 610, 374.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama, K., Lord, J. S., Murahari, P., et al. (2016). Review of Scientific Instruments, 87, 125111.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amato, A., Morenzoni, E. (2024). The \( \mu \)SR Technique. In: Introduction to Muon Spin Spectroscopy. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 961. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44959-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation