Regulations and Directives—Past, Present, Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inspection of Medical Devices

Part of the book series: Series in Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMENG))

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout the past few decades, there has been a considerable evolution in the regulation of medical devices, with modifications made to maintain patient safety and enhance device functionality. Medical device regulation used to be less strict, and many devices were certified without going through rigorous testing. This raised various safety issues, and a series of high-profile incidents demonstrated the necessity for more stringent regulation. In order to address this problem, regulators from all over the world established guidelines and laws requiring manufacturers to give proof of the safety and effectiveness of their devices. The Medical Devices Directive (MDD), enacted in Europe in 1993, established the legal foundation for medical device regulation within the European Union. The Medical Device Amendments of 1976 were introduced in the United States of America. Currently, medical device regulation is more comprehensive, with more rigorous testing and evaluation procedures in place. In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees the regulation of medical devices, and requires manufacturers to provide evidence of safety and efficacy before a device can be approved for use. In Europe, the MDD has been replaced by the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), which impose stricter requirements on medical device manufacturers, distributors, and importers. In other parts of the world, medical device regulation is also becoming more stringent. Medical device legislation is probably going to keep changing in the future. The use of real-world evidence (RWE) to guide regulatory choices is receiving more attention, and this trend is likely to continue. With the provision of a more thorough understanding of how devices function in the actual world, the usage of RWE can aid in enhancing the accuracy of regulatory decisions. The usage of digital health technology, such as wearables and smartphone apps, is also gaining popularity. Healthcare could be transformed by these technologies, but they also present new regulatory difficulties. As a result, regulatory organisations all around the world are investigating fresh ideas for regulating digital health technologies. Globally, the past, present and future of medical device regulation show how critical it is to protect patient safety and improve device functionality. Although the regulations have tightened over time, they still need to adapt and change to meet the demands of the ever-changing healthcare environment, which presents challenges not only for the manufacturers themselves but also for the competent bodies that carry out the conformity assessment of the products in question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    As part of conformity assessment, the manufacturer or the authorised representative must draw up a Declaration of conformity (DoC). The declaration should contain all information to identify:

    • the product.

    • the legislation according to which it is issued.

    • the manufacturer or the authorised representative.

    • the notified body if applicable.

    • a reference to harmonised standards or other normative documents, where appropriate.

References

  1. Badnjević A, Cifrek M, Magjarević R, Džemić Z (eds) (2018) Inspection of medical devices. In: Series in biomedical engineering. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  2. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/goods/new-legislative-framework_en

  3. https://europa.eu/european-union/law/legal-acts_en

  4. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en

  5. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards_en

  6. The European Committee for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  7. The European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  8. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute

    Google Scholar 

  9. Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 Feb 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments

    Google Scholar 

  10. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/our-services/product-certification/ukca-mark/

  11. https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-topics-interest/unique-device-identifier-udi_en#udi-issuing-entities

  12. Regulation on medical devices 2017/745/EU

    Google Scholar 

  13. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/goods/building-blocks/notified-bodies_en

  14. 765/2008/EC Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products

    Google Scholar 

  15. EUROPA—European Commission—Growth—Regulatory policy—NANDO

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurbeta L, Dzemic Z, Bego T, Sejdic E, Badnjevic A (2017) Testing of anesthesia machines and defibrillators in healthcare institutions. J Med Syst 41:133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. https://www.vde.com/topics-de/health/beratung/die-eu-medizinprodukteverordnung-mdr-was-aendert-sich

  18. Medical devices: guidance document, Classification of medical devices, MEDDEV 2. 4/1 Rev. 9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en

  20. Badnjevic A, Gurbeta L, Boskovic D, Dzemic Z (2015) Measurement in medicine—Past, present, future. Folia Medica Facultatis Medicinae Universitatis Saraeviensis J 50(1):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  21. The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU product rules 2022, (Text with EEA relevance), 2022/C 247/01

    Google Scholar 

  22. Conformity Assessment Routes Under MDR 2017/745 - Acorn Regulatory

    Google Scholar 

  23. Conformity assessment modules (productip.com)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO 13485 (2020) Quality management for medical devices. In: Clinical engineering handbook. Academic Press, pp 715–721. ISBN 9780128134672

    Google Scholar 

  25. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/medical-devices_en

  26. ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices—Quality management systems—Requirements for regulatory purposes

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems—Requirements

    Google Scholar 

  28. ISO 13485 (2016) Quality management for medical devices, brochure, 1 edn

    Google Scholar 

  29. Council Directive Of December 20, 1979 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement and on the repeal of Directive 71/354/EEC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Directive 2014/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of February 26, 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments

    Google Scholar 

  31. OIML D 1 Considerations for a Law on Metrology, Edition 2012 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  32. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/goods/free-movement-sectors_en

  33. International vocabulary of terms in legal metrology (VIML), Edition 2022 (E/F)

    Google Scholar 

  34. OIML Recommendations (www.oiml.org)

  35. Ferreira MD (2011) The role of metrology in medical devices. OIML Bull LII(4). Instituto Português da Qualidade, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  36. Direkcija za mere I tegove (www.dmdm.rs)

  37. Badnjevic A, Gurbeta L, Jimenez ER, Iadanza E (2017) Testing of mechanical ventilators and infant incubators in healthcare institutions. Technol Health Care J

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gurbeta L, Badnjevic A, Dzemic Z, Jimenez ER, Jakupovic A (2016) Testing of therapeutic ultrasound in healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: 2nd EAI international conference on future access enablers of ubiquitous and intelligent infrastructures, 24–25 Oct 2016, Belgrade, Serbia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gurbeta L, Badnjevic A, Pinjo N, Ljumic F (2015) Software package for tracking status of inspection dates and reports of medical devices in healthcare institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: XXV International conference on information, communication and automation technologies (IEEE ICAT), pp 1–5, 29–31 Oct 2015. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gurbeta L, Badnjevic A, Sejdinovic D, Alic B, Abd El-Ilah L, Zunic E (2016) Software solution for tracking inspection processes of medical devices from legal metrology system. In: XIV Mediterranean conference on medical and biological engineering and computing (MEDICON), 31. Mar–02 Apr 2016, Paphos, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gurbeta L, Badnjevic A (2017) Inspection process of medical devices in healthcare institutions: software solution. Health Technol 7(1):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Karaböce B, Gülmez Y, Akgöz M, Kaykısızlı H, Yalçınkaya B, Dorosinskiy L (2005) Medical metrology studies at Tübitak UME. In: 17 International congress of metrology

    Google Scholar 

  43. Badnjević A, Gurbeta Pokvić L, Hasičić M, Bandić L, Mašetić Z, Kovačević Z, Kevrić J, Pecchia L (2019) Evidence-based clinical engineering: machine learning algorithms for prediction of defibrillator performance. Biomed Signal Process Control 54:101629

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kovačević Ž, Gurbeta Pokvić L, Spahić L, Badnjević A (2019) Prediction of medical device performance using machine learning techniques: infant incubator case study. Health Technol

    Google Scholar 

  45. Badnjević A, Avdihodžić H, Gurbeta Pokvić L (2021) Artificial intelligence in medical devices: past, present and future. Psychiatria Danubina 33(suppl 3):101–106

    Google Scholar 

  46. Badnjević A et al (2022) Post-market surveillance of medical devices: a review. Technol Health Care 30(6):1315–1329

    Google Scholar 

  47. Badnjević A (2023) Evidence-based maintenance of medical devices: current shortage and pathway towards solution. Technol Health Care 31(1):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haris Memić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Memić, H., Bošnjaković, A., Džemić, Z., Badnjević, A. (2024). Regulations and Directives—Past, Present, Future. In: Badnjević, A., Cifrek, M., Magjarević, R., Džemić, Z. (eds) Inspection of Medical Devices . Series in Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43444-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation