Complex Intersections: Reflections on Women, Gender Inequality and Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and the Energy Sector

Abstract

The theme of gender and energy has two dimensions, both closely related to the role of energy and its social implications in the private and public spheres of life. Firstly, the impact of contextual factors such as environmental structures on social relations at the nexus of energy-human interactions cannot be underestimated. Secondly, this understanding is essential in unpacking the relationship between gender and energy (Braudel, 1992; Harris, 2004) and, subsequently, gender inequality in the energy sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27640904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(3), 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altvater, E. (2007). The capitalist energy system and the crisis of the global financial markets: The impact on labour. Labour, Capital and Society, 40(1/2). Special issue Globalization, Labour and Development, pp. 18–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43460537

  • Amorim, R., López, J., Molina-Moreno, V., & Peña-García, A. (2017). Use of natural light vs. cold LED lighting in installations for the recovery of victims of gender violence: Impact on energy consumption and victim’s recovery. Sustainability, 9(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anfinsen, M., & Heidenreich, S. (2017). Energy & Gender: A social sciences and humanities cross-cutting theme report. SHAPE ENERGY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arachchi, J. I., & Managi, S. (2021). Preferences for energy sustainability: Different effects of gender on knowledge and importance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., Daggett, C., & Labuski, C. (2020). Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels in not enough. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2021). Is capitalism structurally indifferent to gender? Routes to value theory of reproductive labour. A Economy and Space, 53(7), 1749–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211031572. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/epnSAGE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloodhart, B., & Swim, J. K. (2020). Sustainability and consumption: What’s gender got to do with it? Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer, A. J. (2018). Intersectionality and marxism: A critical historiography. Historical Materialism, 26(2), 46–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer, A. J. (2019). Marxism and intersectionality. Race, gender, class and sexuality under contemporary capitalism. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolsø, A., Phillips, M., & Sabelis, I. (2018). Gendering environmental sustainability and organization: Introduction. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12218

  • Bradley, H. (2007). Gender. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1998). The wheels of commerce. Civilization and capitalism. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A., & Lindén, A. L. (2010). Energy efficiency in residences – Challenges for women and men in the North. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2163–2172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, J. (2016). Mainstreaming gender in energy sector practice and policy lessons from the Energy International Network, Department for International Development, UK Report: Gender Energy Research Programme, 30 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, J., Özerol, G., Mohlakoana, N., Feenstra, M., & Cueva, L. S. (Eds.). (2020). Engendering the energy transition. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons. ebook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Map** the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. (59 pages). https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R., Walker, G., & Simcok, N. (2016). Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy, 93(2016), 255–264. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMuzio, T., & Ovadia, J. S. (Eds.). (2016). Energy, capitalism and world order. Towards a new agenda in International Political Economy. London Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, H. (2008). Reflections on intersectionality: Gender, class, race and nation. Journal of Gender Studies, 11, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. (2004). Braudel: Historical time and the horror of discontinuity. History Workshop Journal, 57(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/57.1.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, G., Tatli, A., Ipek, G., Özturk, M., Seirstad, C., & Wright, T. (2018). In the steps of Joan Acker – A journey in researching inequality regimes and intersectional inequalities. Gender Work and Organization, 26(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12252

  • Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting patriarchy as theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, A., Milman, A. D., & Kammen, D. M. (2005). Letting the (energy) Gini out of the metrics of energy distribution and equity. Energy Policy, 33, 1825–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P., Van Fa, Y., & Klemeš, J. (2021, March 1). Impacts of COVID-19 on energy demand and consumption: Challenges, lessons and emerging opportunities, Applied Energy, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116441

  • Johnson, W. O., Han, J. Y., Knight, A., Mortensen, S., Aung, M. T., Boyland, M., & Resurrección, B. (2020, December). Intersectionality and energy transitions: A review of gender, social equity and low-carbon energy, Energy Research & Social Science, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101774

  • Łapniewska, Z. (2019). Energy, equality and sustainability? European electricity cooperatives from gender perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 57(November), 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J., Kleiber, D. L., Lawless, S., & Cohen, P. J. (2021). Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions. Nature Climate Change, 11(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00999-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Listo, R. (2018). Gender myths in energy poverty literature – A Critical discourse Analysis. Energy Research & Social Science, 38(2018), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. D., & Mulvaney. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. Geographical Journal, 179(2013), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngarava, S., Zhou, L., Ningi, T., Charu, M., & Mdiya, L. (2022). Gender and ethnic disparities in energy poverty: The case of South Africa. Elsevier, Energy Policy, 161, 112755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo, A., & Maestre, M. (2019). Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha Lawton, N. (2019). Enhancing risk and safety management in large scale renewable energy generation. In G. Arruda (Ed.), Renewable energy for the Arctic. New perspectives (Routledge Explorations in Energy Studies) (pp. 175–190). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas-Flores, J. A., & Galvez, D. M. (2010). What goes up: Recent Trends in Mexican residential energy use. Energy, 35, 2596–2602. Retrieved August 2, 2018, from http://sspp.proquest.com

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2014). Rethinking gender and identity in energy studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, S. S. (2018). Develo** an intersectional-informed, multi-sited, critical policy ethnography to examine power and procedural justice in multiscalar energy and climate change decision making processes. Energy Research & Social Sciences, 45, 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søraa, R., Anfinsen, M., Foulds, C., Korsnes, M. L., Vivian, R., & Ryghaug, M. (2020, April). Diversifying diversity: Inclusive engagement, intersectionality, and gender identity in a European Social Sciences and Humanities Energy research project. Energy Research & Social Science, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101380

  • Sovacool, B. (2014a). What are we doing here? Analysing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. (2014b). Deciphering energy justice and injustice. In B. K. Sovacool, R. V. Sidortsov, & B. R. Jones (Eds.), Energy security, equality and justice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Q., Maslyuk, S., & Clulow, V. (2014). Energy consumption inequality and human development. In Z. Morvaj (Ed.), Energy efficiency – A bridge to low carbon economy (pp. 101–116). In Tech.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Rocha Lawton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rocha Lawton, N., Forson, C. (2024). Complex Intersections: Reflections on Women, Gender Inequality and Energy. In: Rocha Lawton, N., Forson, C. (eds) Women and the Energy Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43091-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation