Abstract
Agroecological production systems are often described as being knowledge-intensive or management-intensive. However, what does the term ‘intensity’ mean in agroecosystems analysis? It can be simply defined as the degree to which a production factor is used in a production process, relative to other production factors and output productivity. Land, labour, and capital are the classical production factors in agriculture, and the way in which they are combined to realize a certain production determines different levels and forms of agricultural intensification and productivity. Nowadays, knowledge is considered as a fourth production factor. The use of agricultural knowledge—traditional, scientific, popular, etc.—may replace or reduce the need for other production factors to achieve similar levels of productivity. A common misconception related to intensification is the assumption that family or smallholder agriculture is less intensive than industrial agriculture. This chapter will provide concepts and tools to analyse that. Another concept closely related to production factors is that of resources. In agricultural economics, resources are classified as fixed or long-term (such as land, machinery, infrastructure, irrigation systems, etc.) and operational or short-term resources, which are consumed completely during one production process (e.g., seeds, fertilizers). This view is strongly rooted in the industrial approach to agriculture that emerged during the green revolution. In agroecology, we tend to see most resources as being reproducible (e.g., land can be restored, seeds can be produced locally, nutrients can be recycled, etc.), and we distinguish between internally sourced and externally sourced resources, as well as between biotic resources (e.g., genetic resources, biodiversity, pollen) and abiotic ones (water, nutrients). The differences between these views have several implications for the way in which resource use efficiencies are calculated, especially because a single resource can be used in several processes in the agroecosystem, within a single season or over time. However, to understand how this can be done in agroecology, it is first necessary to know how factor allocation, resource use, and productivity are analysed in classical agronomy. This chapter provides system analytical concepts and methods to assess agricultural intensification, factor productivity, and resource allocation. However, resource allocation analyses are restricted here to land and labour. Financial resources are left out of this chapter, as they are often analysed in light of economic theory, which represents a completely different paradigm compared to systems analysis. Patterns concerning the spatial allocation of biomass and nutrients are discussed in Chap. 7, while trade-offs around the allocation of financial versus other resources are addressed in Chap. 9.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In languages other than English, the term extensive systems is generally used to describe low intensity agriculture, and ‘extensification’ as a trajectory towards lower intensities in the use of production factors.
References
Abrell T, Naudin K, Bianchi F, Aragao D, Tittonell P, Corbeels M (2022) Cassava root yield variability in shifting cultivation systems in the eastern Amazon region of Brazil. Exp Agric 58:E38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479722000333
Ajayi OO, Akinnifesi F, Sileshi G, Kanjipite W, (2009) Labour inputs and financial profitability of conventional and agroforestry-based soil fertility management practices in Zambia. Agrekon 48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2009.9523827
Bedoussac, Laurent and Justes, Eric, 2010. The efficiency of a durum wheat-winter pea intercrop to improve yield and wheat grain protein concentration depends on N availability during early growth. Plant Soil, vol. 330, n° 1–2, pp. 19–35
Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth. Aldine, Chicago, 124 pp
Boserup E (1981) Population and technological change: a study of long-term trends. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carter MR (1984) Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production. Oxf Econ Pap 36:131–145
Chuang FT (1973) An analysis of change of Taiwan’s cultivated land utilization for recent years. Rural Econ Div, JCRR Rep. 21, Taipei, Taiwan
Cornia GA (1985) Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: an analysis for fifteen develo** countries. World Dev 13(4):513–534
Dalrymple DF (1971) Survey of multiple crop** in less developed nations. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC, FEDS, 108 p
De Giusti G, Kristjanson P, Rufino M (2019) Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation practice in smallholder farming: evidence from Kenya. Clim Chang 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02390-0
de Ponti T, Rijk B, van Ittersum MK (2012) The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric Syst 108:1–9
De Wit CT (1982) Simulation of living systems. Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Pudoc, Laboratorium voor Theoretische Productie Ecologie en Agronomie, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Debru J (2009) L’abandon de la culture du cotonnier est-il momentané ou définitif? Diagnostic agro-économique d’une petite région agricole dans le bassin de la Bénoué, au Nord Cameroun. Mémoire de Master, AgroParisTech, Paris, France, pp 84
Duriaux Chavarría JY (2014) Energy flows in the farming systems of Southern Ethiopia: implications for sustainable intensification. M.Sc. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
Ellis F (1993) Peasant economics. Cambridge Books/Cambridge University Press, number 9780521457118
Frank L, Sallis J, Conway T, Chapman J, Saelens B, Bachman W (2006) Multiple pathways from land use to health: walkability associations with active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J Am Plan Assoc 71(1):75–87
Funes-Monzote FR, Monzote M, Lantinga EA, Keulen H (2009) Conversion of specialised dairy farming systems into sustainable mixed farming systems in Cuba. Environ Dev Sustain 11(4):765–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9142-7
Ibarrola-Rivas MJ, Galicia L (2017) Rethinking food security in Mexico: discussing the need for sustainable transversal policies linking food production and food consumption. Investig Geograficas 2017:106–121
Isakson SR (2009) No hay ganancia en la milpa: the agrarian question, food sovereignty, and the on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity in the Guatemalan highlands. J Peasant Stud 36:725–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903353876
Jensen E, Bedoussac L, Carlsson G, Journet EP, Justes E, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2015) Enhancing yields in organic crop production by eco-functional intensification. Sustain Agri Res 4. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n3p42
Knörzer S Graeff-Hönninger B Guo P Wang W Claupein (2009) The rediscovery of intercrop** in China: a traditional crop** system for future Chinese agriculture – a review
Leatherman T, Goodman AH, Stillman JT (2020) A critical biocultural perspective on tourism and the nutrition transition in the Yucatan. In: Azcorra H, Dickinson F (eds) Culture, environment and health in the Yucatan Peninsula. Springer, Cham, pp 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27001-8_6
Lopez-Ridaura S, Barba-Escoto L, Reyna-Ramirez CA, Sum C, Palacios-Rojas N, Gerard B (2021) Maize intercrop** in the milpa system. Diversity, extent and importance for nutritional security in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. Sci Rep 11(1):3696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82784-2
Lozada-Aranda M, Rojas I, Mastretta A, Ponce-Mendoza A, Burgeff C, Orjuela RA et al (2017) Las milpas en Mexico. Oikos 17:10–12
Malthus T (1798) An essay on the principle of population. In: Elwell F (ed) A commentary on Malthus’ 1798 essay on the principle of population as social theory. Mellen Press, Lewiston, pp 127–294, commentary printed 2001
Malthus T (1826) An essay on the principle of population. Cambridge University Press, edited by Patricia James [1989]
Mann CC (2006) 1491: new revelations of the Americas before Columbus, 1st Vintage Books ed. Vintage, New York
Mazoyer M, Roudart L (2006) A history of world agriculture: from the neolithic age to the current crisis. Earthscan Publication Ltd
Michalscheck M, Groot JCJ, Kotu B, Hoeschle-Zeledon I, Kuivanen K, Descheemaeker K, Tittonell P (2018) Model results versus farmer realities. Operationalizing diversity within and among smallholder farm systems for a nuanced impact assessment of technology packages. Agric Syst 162:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.028
Michalscheck M, Groot JCJ, Fischer G, Tittonell P (2020) Land use decisions: by whom and to whose benefit? A serious game to uncover dynamics in farm land allocation at household level in Northern Ghana. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104325
Moraine M (2009) Analyse de l’organisation spatiale à l’échelle de l’exploitation et du territoire : le cas de la région de Kisumu, Kenya. Mémoire de fin d'études Ingénieur de l’enesad en Formation Initiale, Dijon, France, 71 p
Novotny IP, Fuentes-Ponce MH, Lopez-Ridaura S, Tittonell P, Rossing WAH (2021a) Longitudinal analysis of household types and livelihood trajectories in Oaxaca, Mexico. J Rural Stud 81:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.022
Novotny IP, Tittonell P, Fuentes-Ponce MH, López-Ridaura S, Rossing WAH (2021b) The importance of the traditional milpa in food security and nutritional self-sufficiency in the highlands of Oaxaca, Mexico. PLoS One 16(2):e0246281. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1371/journal.pone.0246281
Ocimati W, Ntamwira J, Groot JCJ, Tittonell P, Ruhigwa B, Blomme G (2019) Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercrop** as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands. Eur J Agron 110:125923
Palacios Bucheli VJ, Cárcamo Mallen RW, Álvarez Macias A, Coral C, Bokelmann W (2021) Indigenous family labor in agroforestry systems in the context of global transformations: the case of the Inga and Camëntsá communities in Putumayo, Colombia. Forests 12:1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111503
Ponisio LC, M’Gonigle LK, Mace KC, Palomino J, de Valpine P, Kremen C (2015) Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc R Soc B 282:20141396
Putnam H, Godek W, Kissmann S, Pierre JL, Alvarado Dzul SH, Calix de Dios H et al (2014) Coupling agro- ecology and PAR to identify appropriate food security and sovereignty strategies in indigenous communities. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 38:165–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.837422
Qian X, Zang H, Xu H, Hu Y, Ren C, Guo L, Wang C, Zeng Z (2018) Relay strip intercrop** of oat with maize, sunflower and mung bean in semi-arid regions of Northeast China: yield advantages and economic benefits. Field Crop Res 223:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.004
Ray S, Sood A, Panigrahy S, Parihar J (2005) Derivation of indices using remote sensing data to evaluate crop** systems. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990732
Righi E (2006) Optimizing hand-weeding labour productivity in maize (Zea mais, L.) production for smallholders in Bukoba District, northwest Tanzania. MSc Thesis Firenze University, Italy, 43 p
Ruben R, Pender J (2004) Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: the quest for policy targeting. Food Policy 29(4):303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.004
Speelman EN, Groot JCJ, García-Barrios LE, Kok K, van Keulen H, Tittonell PA (2014) From co** to adaptation to economic and institutional change – trajectories of change in land-use management and social organization in a biosphere reserve community, Mexico. Land Use Policy 41:31–44
Suijkerbuik N (2005) Livelihood strategies; the case of diversification and risk attitudes of smallholders in Central Kenya. MSc Thesis Wageningen Uniersity, The Netherlands, 71 p
Tittonell P (2003) Soil fertility gradients in smallholder farms of western Kenya. Their origin, magnitude and importance. In: Quantitative Approaches in Systems Analysis No. 25, ISBN 90-6754-713-1, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 233 p
Tittonell (2014) Ecological intensification – sustainable by nature. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 8:53–61
Tittonell P (2018) Ecological intensification of agriculture, Ch. 13. In: Serraj R, **ali P (eds) Agriculture & Food Systems to 2050. Global trends, challenges and opportunities. World Scientific, pp 437–472. https://doi.org/10.1142/11212
Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, de Ridder N, Giller KE (2007) Heterogeneity of crop productivity and resource use efficiency within smallholder Kenyan farms: soil fertility gradients or management intensity gradients? Agric Syst 94:376–390
Tittonell P, Corbeels M, van Wijk MT, Giller KE (2009) FIELD – a summary simulation model of the soil-crop system to analyse long-term resource interactions and use efficiencies at farm scale. Eur J Agron 32:10–21
Tittonell P, Scopel E, Andrieu N, Posthumus H, Mapfumo P, Corbeels M, van Halsema GE, Lahmar R, Lugandu S, Rakotoarisoa J, Mtambanengwe F, Pound B, Chikowo R, Naudin K, Triomphe B, Mkomwa S (2012) Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa. Field Crop Res 132:1–7
Tittonell P, Hara SM, Álvarez VE, Aramayo VM, Bruzzone OA, Easdale MH, Enriquez AS, Laborda L, Trinco FD, Villagra SE, El Mujtar V (2021) Ecosystem services and disservices associated with pastoral systems from Patagonia, Argentina – a review. Cah Agri 30:43. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021029
Van Heemst HDJ (1986) Crop calendar, workability and labour requirements. In: Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. Wageningen University, pp 251–262, ISBN: 9022008584
van Ittersum MK, Rabbinge R (1997) Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crop Res 52:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00037-3
Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2007) Soil type, historical management and current resource allocation: three dimensions regulating variability of maize yields and nutrient use efficiencies on African smallholder farms. Field Crop Res 101:296–305
Zingore S, Tittonell P, Corbeels M, Wijk MT, Giller KE (2011) Managing soil fertility diversity to enhance resource use efficiencies in smallholder farming systems: a case from Murewa District, Zimbabwe. Nut Cycl Agroecosyst 90:87-103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tittonell, P. (2023). Production Functions and Factors in Agroecosystems. In: A Systems Approach to Agroecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42939-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42939-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42937-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42939-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)