Communities and Ecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freshwater and Marine Ecology
  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, communities are defined as the totality of all populations interacting in a joint habitat, i.e. living space. The term ecosystem includes the biologically relevant components of the living space, i.e. those components which determine living conditions and which are influenced themselves by the activities of the local communities. These activities include extraction of resources, disposal of wastes, and ecosystem engineering. A description of “community processes” includes birth rates, predation rates, death rates, etc., using individuals as currency to quantify processes. A description of “ecosystem processes” includes uptake rates, production rates, respiration rates using masses of chemical substances or energetic units for quantification. In spite of a long-lasting division between community- and ecosystems-centered research traditions, both ways of measuring and describing processes are only two sides of the same coin. Therefore, the community and the ecosystem perspective will be merged in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

A:

Area

b:

Allometry coefficient

BCS:

Bray–Curtis similarity

c:

Constant

D:

Simpson’s diversity index

E:

Evenness

H′:

Shannon’s diversity index

N:

Number of individuals

pi:

Relative abundance (biomass) of species i

PIE:

Probability of interspecific encounters

S:

Species number

TL:

Trophic level

References

  • Acuña JL (2001) Pelagic tunicates: Why gelatinous? Am Nat 158:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alldredge AL (1977) House morphology and mechanisms of feeding in the oikopleuridae (Tunicata, Appendicularia). J Zool Lond 181:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen AP, Gillooly JF (2006) Assessing latitudinal gradients in speciation rates and biodiversity at the global scale. Ecol Lett 9:947–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 10:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Båmstedt U, Martinussen MB, Matsakis S (1994) Trophodynamics of the two scyphozoan jellyfishes, Aurelia aurita and Cyanea capillata, in western Norway. ICES J Mar Sci 51:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Environ Biol Fish 28:189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersier LF, Banasek-Richter C, Cattin MF (2002) Quantitative descriptors of food-web matrices. Ecology 83:2394–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwagen SL, Heupel MR, Chin A, Simpfendorfer CA (2017) Trophodynamics as a tool for understanding coral reef ecosystems. Front Mar Sci 5:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaldo RM, Bellwood DR (2011) Parrotfish predation on massive Porites on the Great barrier reef. Coral Reefs 30:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Bertness MD (2001) Habitat modification and facilitation in Benthic marine communities. In: Bertness MD, Hay ME, Gaines SD (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 201–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2010) Impact of herbivore identity on algal succession and coral growth on a Caribbean reef. PLoS One 5:e8963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Calbet A, Landry M (2004) Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems. Limnol Oceanogr 49:51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carballo JL, Bautista E, Nava H, Cruz-Barraza JA, Chavez JA (2013) Boring sponges, an increasing threat for coral reefs affected by bleaching events. Ecol Evol 3(4):872–886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caron DA, Dam HG, Kremer P, Lessard EJ, Madin LP, Malone TC, Napp JM, Peele ER, Roman MR, Youngbluth MG (1995) The contribution of microorganisms to particulate carbon and nitrogen in surface waters of the Sargasso Sea near Bermuda. Deep Sea Res. I 42:943–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RC (1986) Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol Monogr 56:345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie H, Norderhaug KM, Fredriksen S (2009) Macrophytes as habitat for fauna. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 396:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FI (1905) Research methods in Ecology. Univ Nevada Press, Lincoln, NV

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Plant succession; an analysis of vegetation development. Carnegie Inst Washington, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1304–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1975) Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 45:137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deibel D (1982) Laboratory-measured grazing and ingestion rates of the salp, Thalia democratica Forskal, and the doliolid, Dolioletta gegenbauri Uljanin (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 4:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann S (1990) Mussel beds—amensalism or amelioration for intertidal fauna. Helgol Meeresunters 44:335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domis LD, Elser JJ, Gsell AS, Huszar VLM, Ibelings BW, Jeppesen E, Kosten S, Mooij WM, Roland F, Sommer U, Van Donk E, Winder M, Lürling M (2013) Plankton dynamics under different climatic conditions in space and time. Freshwat Biol 58:463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donadi S, Van Der Heide T, Van Der Zee EM, Eklöf JS, Van De Koppel J, Weerman EJ, Piersma T, Olff H, Eriksson BK (2013) Cross-habitat interactions among bivalve species control community structure on intertidal flats. Ecology 94:489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ortenzio F, Ribera d’Alcalà M (2009) On the trophic regimes of the Mediterranean Sea: A satellite analysis. Biogeosciences 6:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing AJ, Leibold MA (2002) Ecosystem consequences of species richness and identity and composition in pond food webs. Nature 416:837–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte CM, Chiscano CL (1999) Seagrass biomass and production: a reassessment. Aquat Bot 65:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE (2006) Biodiversity and the functioning of seagrass ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel FG, Alegria J, Andriana R, Donadi S, Gusmao JB, van Leeuwe MA, Matthiessen B, Eriksson BK (2013) Mussel beds are biological power stations on intertidal flats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 191:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius KF, Benayahu Y, Genin A (1995) Herbivory in asymbiotic soft corals. Science 268:90–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius KE, Okaji K, De’ath G (2000) Three lines of evidence to link outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns seastar Acanthaster planci to the release of larval food limitation. Coral Reefs 29:593–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garra S, Hall A, Kingsford MJ (2020) The effects of predation on the condition of soft corals. Coral Reefs 38:1329–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason MA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Torrey Bot Club Bull 53:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (1976) The theory of diversity-stability relationships in ecology. Q Rev Biol 50:237–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JK (1997) Occurrence of aggressive mechanisms during interactions between soft corals (Octocorallia : Alcyoniidae) and other corals on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Freshwat Res 48:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher GB (1988) Coral reef primary productivity—a beggar’s banquet. Trends Ecol Evol 3:106–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hays GC, Doyle TK, Houghton JDR (2018) A paradigm shift in the trophic importance of jellyfish. Trends Ecol Evol 33:874–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HillebrandH, Cardinale BJ (2004). Consumer effects decline with prey diversity. Ecol Lett 7:192–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Waterman F, Karez R, Berninger UG (2001) Differences in species richness patterns between unicellular and multicellular organisms. Oecologia 126:114–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes KE (2000) Effects of eutrophication on bioeroding sponge communities with the description of new West Indian sponges, Cliona spp. (Porifera : Hadromerida : Clionidae). Invert Biol 119:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzman R, Genin A (2003) Zooplanktivory by a nocturnal coral-reef fish: Effects of light, flow, and prey density. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1367–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Icnchausti P, Lovorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge TM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle JA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosia A, Titelman J, Hansson LJ, Haraldsson M (2011) Interactions between native and alien ctenophores: Beroe gracilis and Mnemiopsis leidyi in Gullmarsfjorden. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 422:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP (1994) Catastrophes, phase shifts and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265:1547–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Sommeijer B (2002) Population dynamics of sinking phytoplankton in light-limited environments: simulation techniques and critical parameters. J Sea Res 48:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1958) Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many species of animals. Am Nat 93:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Meerhoff M, Holmgren K, Gonzalez-Bergonzoni I, Teixeira-de Mello F, Declerck SAJ et al (2010) Impacts of climate warming on lake fish community structure and potential effects on ecosystem function. Hydrobiologia 646:73–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kéfi S, Holmgren M, Scheffer M (2016) When can positive interactions cause alternative stable states in ecosystems? Funct Ecol 30:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, Santos SR (2018) Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol 28:2570–2580.e6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landry MR, Selp KE, Brown SL, Abbott MR, Measures CI, Vink S, Allen CB, Calbet A, Christensen S, Nolla H (2002) Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton in the Antarctic Polar Front region at 170 degrees W. Deep Sea Res Part II 49:1843–1865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinaas HP, Christie H (1996) Effects of removing sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis): Stability of the barren state and succession of kelp forest recovery in the east Atlantic. Oecologia 105:524–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WM (1967) Tropical limnology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:159–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchman E, Klausmeier CA (2008) trait-based ecology of phytoplankton. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:615–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity inn biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marañon E (2015) Cell size as a key determinant of phytoplankton metabolism and community structure. Ann Rev Mar Sci 7:241–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marnane MJ, Bellwood DR (2002) Diet and nocturnal foraging in cardinalfishes (Apogonidae) at One Tree Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen B, Hillebrand H (2006) Dispersal frequency affects local biomass production by controlling local diversity. Ecol Lett 9:652–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ (1999) Macroalgae, nutrients and phase shifts on coral reefs: scientific issues and management consequences for the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 18:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrady-Steed J, Morin PJ (2000) Biodiversity, density compensation, and the dynamic of functional groups. Ecology 81:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerhoff M, Clemente JM, Teixeira-de Mello F, Iglesias C, Pedersen AR, Jeppesen E (2007) Can warm climate-related structure of littoral predator assemblies weaken the clear water state in shallow lakes? Global Change Biol 13:1888–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RJ, Mann KH, Scarratt DJ (1971) Potential production of a lobster-seaweed community in eastern Canada. J Fish Res Board Can 28:1733–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RJ, Lafferty KD, Lamy T, Kui L, Rassweiler A, Reed DC (2018) Giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, increases faunal diversity through physical engineering. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 285:20172571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW, Cornell HV, Allen AP, Brown JM, Bush MB, Harrison SP, Hurlbert AH, Knowlton N, Lessios HA, McCain CM, McCune AR, McDade LA, McPeek MA, Near TJ, Price TD, Ricklefs RE, Roy K, Sax DF, Schluter D, Sobel JM, Turelli M (2007) Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett 10:315–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moustaka-Gouni M, Sommer U (2014) Modifying the PEG-model for Mediterranean lakes—no biological winter and strong fish predation. Freshwat Biol 59:1136–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustaka-Gouni M, Kormas KA, Scotti M, Vardaka E, Sommer U (2016) Warming and acidification effects on planktonic pico- and nanoflagellates in a mesocosm experiment. Protist 167:389–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norling P, Kautsky N (2007) Structural and functional effects of Mytilus edulis on diversity of associated species and ecosystem functioning. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 351:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual M, Dunne JA (2006) Ecological networks: linking structure to dynamics in food webs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BJ, Rose CD, Rutten LM, Fourqurean JW (2002) Disturbance and recovery following catastrophic grazing: studies of a successional chronosequence in a seagrass bed. Oikos 97:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Russel CJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269:247–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy LR (1974) The oceans food web, a changing paradigm. BioScience 24:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozas-Schacre C, Casey JM, Brandl SJ, Kulbicki M, Harmelin-Vivien M, Strona G, Parravicini V (2021) Congruent trophic pathways underpin global coral reef food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2100966118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke JH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective survey of theory and test. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise K, Buschbaum C, Büttger H, Wegner KM (2017) Invading oysters and native mussels: from hostile takeover to compatible bedfellows. Ecosphere 8:e01949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risk EM, Sammarco PW, Edinger EN (1995) Bioerosion in Acropora across the shelf of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 14:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff JC, Hopcroft RR, Clarke C, Chishol LA, Lynn DH, Gilron GL (1990) Structure and energy flow in a tropical neritic planktonic community off Kingston, Jamaica. In: Barnes M, Gibson RN (eds) Trophic relationships in the marine environment. Aberdeen Univ Press, Aberdeen, pp 266–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotjan RD, Lewis SM (2008) Impact of coral predators on tropical reefs. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 367:73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotjan RD, Dimond JL, Thornhill DJ, Leichter JJ, Helmuth B, Kemp DW, Lewis SM (2006) Chronic parrotfish grazing impedes coral recovery after bleaching. Coral Reefs 25:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Hosper ME, Meijer M-L, Moss B, Jeppesen E (1993) Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol Evol 8:275–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr EB, Sherr BF (2002) Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:293–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1999) The impact of herbivore type and grazing pressure on benthic microalgal diversity. Ecol Lett 2:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (2000) Benthic microalgal diversity enhanced by spatial heterogeneity of grazing. Oecologia 122:284–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (2005) Biologische Meereskunde, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Stibor H (2002) Copepoda–Cladocera–Tunicata: The role of three major mesozooplankton groups in pelagic food webs. Ecol Res 17:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Worm B (2002) Synthesis; Back to Santa Rosalia or no wonder there are so many species. In: Sommer U, Worm B (eds) Competition and coexistence. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 207–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Gliwicz ZM, Lampert W, Duncan A (1986) The PEG model of a seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch Hydrobiol 106:433–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Sommer F, Santer B, Jamieson C, Boersma M, Becker C, Hansen T (2001) Complementary impact of copepods and cladocerans on phytoplankton. Ecol Lett 4:545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Stibor H, Katechakis A, Sommer F, Hansen T (2002) Pelagic food web configurations at different levels of nutrient richness and their implications for the ratio fish production:primary production. Hydrobiologia 484:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Adrian R, de Senerpont-Domis L, Elser JJ, Gaedke U, Ibelings B, Jeppesen E, Lürling M, Molinero JC, Moiij WM, van Donk E, Winder M (2012) Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) model: mechanisms driving plankton succession. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:429–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Charalampous E, Scotti M, Moustaka-Gouni M (2018) Big fish eat small fish: implications for food chain length? Community Ecol 19:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin YI (1995) Coral reef ecology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup H (1953) On conditions for the vernal blooming of phytoplankton. J Cons Int Explor Mer 18:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait RV (1981) Elements of marine ecology, 3rd edn. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thienemann A (1941) Vom Wesen der Ökologie. Biol Gen 15:312–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Thingstad TF, Lignell R (1997) Theoretical models for the control of bacterial growth rate, abundance, diversity and carbon demand. Aquat Microb Ecol 13:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity, population, and ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittensor DP, Micheli F, Nyström M, Worm B (2007) Human impacts on the species–area relationship in reef fish assemblages. Ecol Lett 10:760–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trombetta T, Vidussi F, Roques C, Scotti M, Mostajir B (2020) Marine microbial food web networks during phytoplankton bloom and non-bloom periods: Warming favors smaller organism interactions and intensifies trophic cascade. Front Microbiol 11:502336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Uribe RA, Ortiz M, Jordan F (2021) Discrete steps of successional pathways differ in kelp forest and urchin barren communities. Comm Ecol 22:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ouderaa IBC, Claassen JR, van de Koppel J, Bishop MJ, Eriksson BK (2021) Bioengineering promotes habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on mussel reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 540:151561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varkitzi I, Psarra S, Assimakopoulou G, Pavlidou A, Krasakopoulou E, Velaoras D, Papathanassiou E, Pagou K (2020) Phytoplankton dynamics and bloom formation in the oligotrophic eastern Mediterranean: Field Studies in the Aegean, Levantine and Ionian seas. Deep Sea Res Part II 171:104662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vejříková I, Vejřík L, Čech M, Říha M, Peterka J (2021) Succession of submerged vegetation in a hydrologically reclaimed opencast mine during first 10 years. Restor Ecol 30:e13489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinebrooke RD, Cottingham KL, Norberg J, Scheffer M, Dodson SI, Maberly SC, Sommer U (2004) Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oikos 104:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington HG (1984) Diversity, biotic, and similarity indices. Water Res 18:653–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil E, Smith G, Gil-Agudelo DL (2006) Status and progress in coral reef disease research. Dis Aquat Organ 69:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Lotze HK, Hillebrand H, Sommer U (2002) Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417:848–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1463–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercise Questions

Exercise Questions

The right-hand column of the table below indicates the place where the answer can be found, deduced logically from the information contained in the text, or calculated from the equations there.

 

Question

Section

1

Distinguish the terms community and ecosystem

7

2

What is a metacommunity?

7.1.1

3

Explain the difference between the superorganism concept and the individualistic concept of communities and ecosystems

7.1.2

4

Which factors determine the species composition of a community?

7.1.2

5

What are connectance and link density?

7.1.3

6

How and why are species aggregated into guilds?

7.1.3

7

List at least 4 collective properties of communities

7.1.4

8

What is a trophic level?

7.2.1

9

Which trophic level do primary consumers form?

7.2.1

10

Does production necessarily decrease with trophic level? And why?

7.2.1

11

Does biomass necessarily decrease with trophic level? And why?

7.2.1

12

What is ecological efficiency?

7.2.1

13

How can DOC excreted by organisms become available for feeding by higher trophic levels?

7.2.2

14

Explain the microbial loop

7.2.2

15

Why has the concept of the food chain to be replaced by the concept of the food web?

7.2.2

16

How important is consumption of primary production by the microbial food web?

7.2.2

17

How is the importance of the microbial food web related to nutrient richness?

7.2.2

18

Why is the jelly food chain disadvantageous for the feeding of fish?

7.2.2

19

Compare freshwater and marine pelagic food webs with respect to the microbial food web, the mesozooplankton serving as food for fish and the jelly food chain

7.2.2

20

How does the trophic level of zooplankton feeding fish change with nutrient conditions?

7.2.2

21

Why is the energy transfer from the 1st to the 2nd trophic level in hard-bottom benthos often less efficient than in the pelagic?

7.2.2

22

Compare the importance of ecosystem engineers in the pelagic and in the benthos

7.3

23

How do perennial macrophytes influence the living conditions of organisms living within macrophyte beds?

7.3.1

24

Which guilds profit from giant kelps, which suffer disadvantages?

7.3.1

25

Explain the difference of the attachment modes of mussels and oysters

7.3.2

26

How do mussel reefs influence the fauna in intertidal flats in the vicinity?

7.3.2

27

Can reef-building oysters and mussels coexist? If yes, how?

7.3.2

28

Which groups of organisms are the dominant ecosystem engineers in coral reefs?

7.3.3

29

Are corals the only calcifying organisms in coral reefs?

7.3.3

30

Explain the role of parrotfish in coral reefs

7.3.3

31

Which types of organisms might overgrow reef-building corals and which ones protect them from overgrowth?

7.3.3

32

Explain coral bleaching

7.3.3

33

Which role do crown-of-thorns starfish play in coral reefs?

7.3.3

34

How can coral reefs have so much biomass and production in nutrient-poor seas?

7.3.3

35

Calculate Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity index for the three following communities (A, B, C) from species relative abundances:

A: sp 1: 0.5, sp 2: 0.3, sp 3: 0.1, sp 4: 0.05, sp 5: 0.0.5

B: sp 1: 0.3, sp 2: 0.3, sp 3: 0.3, sp 4: 0.05, sp 5: 0.0.5

C: sp 1: 0.3, sp. 2: 0.3, sp 3: 0.2, sp 4: 0.05, sp 5: 0.05, sp 6: 0.05, sp 7: 0.06

7.4.1

36

Explain the difference between α-, β-, and ϒ-diversity

7.4.1

37

Which factors determine the local species pool?

7.4.2

38

How can the latitudinal trend of diversity be explained? Offer several alternative explanations?

7.4.2

39

How does predation influence local diversity?

7.4.2

40

How does productivity influence the impact of predation on diversity?

7.4.2

41

How can we distinguish between the sampling and the complementarity effect of diversity on productivity?

7.4.3

42

Does diversity at one trophic level increase or decrease the top-down effect of the next higher trophic level?

7.4.3

43

Does diversity at one trophic level increase or decrease the top-down effect on the next lower level?

7.4.3

44

Explain the difference between constancy and persistence

7.4.3

45

What is the difference between resistance and resilience of a community?

7.4.3

46

Can we expect that diversity has the same effect on the stability of collective community properties and on individual populations?

7.4.3

47

What is the insurance effect of diversity?

7.4.3

48

What are the main differences between pioneer and late successional species?

7.5.1

49

What is the difference between succession and phenology?

7.5.1

50

How can we analyze successional sequences if succession time by far exceeds the lifetime of observers?

7.5.1

51

Can sea urchins influence macroalgal succession towards a kelp forest? If yes, how?

7.5.2

52

How do different herbivorous fish influence succession in a coral reef?

7.5.2

53

How do cover and depth penetration of macrophytes change during primary succession in a manmade lake?

7.5.2

54

Why is pelagic seasonality a mix of succession and phenology?

7.5.3

55

What are the conditions for the development of a spring bloom of phytoplankton?

7.5.3

56

Why is there often a phase of low phytoplankton biomass after the spring bloom?

7.5.3

57

How does summer phytoplankton succession in cold-temperate zones differ between eutrophic and oligotrophic systems?

7.5.3

58

How do unusually high and unusually low densities of zooplanktivorous fish influence the seasonal succession of phyto- and zooplankton in the cold-temperate zone?

7.5.3

59

What is the main difference between cold-temperate/boreal and warm-temperate/subtropical phytoplankton in winter?

7.5.3

60

How does the seasonal pattern of fish predation zooplankton differ between cold-temperate and Mediterranean lakes?

7.5.3

61

What is the reason for ice margin blooms of phytoplankton?

7.5.3

Glossary

α-diversity

local diversity

β-diversity

compositional difference between localities within a community

ϒ-diversity

regional species innventory

bacterivory

feeding on bacteria

biomass

mass of organisms

calcifier

organisms forming calcareous skeletal structures

carnivory

feeding on animal biomass

chronosequence

reconstruction of a successional trajectory from sites of different age (space-for-time substitution)

clear-water phase

mid-season phytoplankton minimum, usually caused by zooplankton grazing

community

sum of populations interacting within a joint habitat

somplementarity

difference in resource use and environmental tolerance of species leading to an improved performance of the community

constancy

absence of change of a state variable through time

coral bleaching

loss of endosymbiotic phototrophs by corals

cover

percent habitat area covered by organisms

detritivory

feeding on dead material

diversity

a combined measure of species number and even distribution of individuals between species

ecological efficiency

ratio between production rates of subsequent trophic levels

ecosystem

system composed of a local community and its physical, chemical, and geological environment

ecosystem engineering

modification of the physical structure of the environment by organisms

elasticity

ability of a community to return to the normal state after a perturbation

eutrophic

nutrient-rich environment

evenness

even distribution of individuals among species

facilitation model

assumption that early successional species prepare the ground for later species

food chain

sequence of predator–prey relationships, A is eaten by B, B by C, C by D, ..

food web

system of branching and connected food chains

foundation species

species with disproportionate high influence on a community, often an ecosystem engineer

guild

group of populations sharing the same resources and predators

herbivory

feeding on plant or algal biomass

individualistic concept

assumption that species are distributed individually in the environment

inhibition model

assumption that species of any successional stage inhibit the intrusion of later successional species. These can only establish if disturbance open opportunities.

jelly food chain

food chain with gelatinous links

kelp forest

macrophyte stands dominated by large brown algae

metacommunity

group of local communities connected by immigration and emigration of organisms

microbial food web

food web with unicellular participants

microbial loop

recycling of DOC to the food web by bacterial uptake of DOC and subsequent bacterivory

oligotrophic

nutrient-poor environment

overyielding

improved performance of a species mixture in comparison to the calculated mixed effect of single-species performances

persistence

longevity of a qualitatively defined community status (e.g., bivalve reef)

phenology

seasonal change in the appearance of a community caused by seasonally bound life cycle events of species

pioneer species

early successional species characterized by high dispersal abilities, high fecundity, short lifetime, and small size

primary production

production of organic matter from inorganic material

resilience

amount of perturbation which a community can tolerate and still return to normal

resistance

ability of a community to maintain its state in spite of perturbations

sampling effect

increased probability of having high performance species with increasing species richness

species–area curve

curve describing the relationship between the number of identified species and the sampled area

succession

replacement of species during the development of a community

superorganism

assumption of a tight integration of communities leading to joint distributions of species, self-regulation, and optimization at the community level

tolerance model

assumption that late successional species first tolerate and then overcome the competitive pressure by early successional species

trophic level

group of organisms with the same position in the food chain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sommer, U. (2023). Communities and Ecosystems. In: Freshwater and Marine Ecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42459-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation