The Similarity of Virtual Meal of a Co-eating Agent Affects Human Participant

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (CollabTech 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14199))

Abstract

In co-eating with real people, similar food consumption was found to benefit food intake and some subjective feelings. While co-eating agents have the potential to be caregivers or companions, the discussion of meal similarity between participants and agents is lacking. In this study, to achieve better social facilitation and the sense of eating together by a co-eating agent, we focused on the effects of meal similarity on eating amount and subjective feelings. We developed co-eating agents which can eat three types of food and conducted a laboratory-based artificial co-eating experiment. The results showed that participants perceived the meal similarity and the sense of eating together to be higher when the co-eating agent eats similar virtual food. In addition, a relationship was found between food tastiness and the difference of eating amount between the conditions. We propose that creating similar foods for co-eating agents can improve the feeling of togetherness in artificial co-eating and have the potential to facilitate eating when the food is preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi, M.J., Park, Y.G., Kim, Y.H., Cho, K.H., Nam, G.E.: Eating together and health-related quality of life among korean adults. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 52, 758–765 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ortiz–Ospina, E.: The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Our world in data (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Shokuiku promotion policies: Fy2017 (white paper on shokuiku) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccaldi, E., Huisman, G., Volpe, G., Mancini, M.: Guess who’s coming to dinner? surveying digital commensality during covid-19 outbreak. In: Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 317–321 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oh, A., Erinosho, T., Dunton, G., Perna, F.M., Berrigan, D.: Cross-sectional examination of physical and social contexts of episodes of eating and drinking in a national sample of US adults. Public Health Nutr. 17(12), 2721–2729 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., Butera, F.: Portion size tells who i am, food type tells who you are: specific functions of amount and type of food in same-and opposite-sex dyadic eating contexts. Appetite 112, 96–101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woolley, K., Fishbach, A.: A recipe for friendship: similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. J. Consum. Psychol. 27, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, J.Y., Kubota, S., Inoue, T.: Effects of meal similarity on interpersonal synchronization in three-party remote dining. Front. Comput. Sci. 4, 838229 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McColl, D., Nejat, G.: A socially assistive robot that can monitor affect of the elderly during mealtime assistance. J. Med. Devices 8(3), 030941 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Randall, N., Joshi, S., Liu, X.: Health-e-eater: dinnertime companion robot and magic plate for improving eating habits in children from low–income families. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp. 361–362 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khot, R. A., Arza, E. S., Kurra, H., Wang, Y.: Fobo: towards designing a robotic companion for solo dining. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii, A., Kochigami, K., Kitagawa, S., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Development and evaluation of mixed reality co-eating system: sharing the behavior of eating food with a robot could improve our dining experience. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO–MAN), pp. 357–362 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi, M., Tanaka, H., Yamana, H., Nakajima, T.: Virtual co-eating: making solitary eating experience more enjoyable. In: Munekata, N., Kunita, I., Hoshino, J. (eds.) ICEC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10507, pp. 460–464. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66715-7_63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Boothby, E.J., Clark, M.S., Bargh, J.A.: Shared experiences are amplified. Psychol. Sci. 25(12), 2209–2216 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niewiadomski, R., Bruijnes, M., Huisman, G., Gallagher, C.P., Mancini, M.: Social robots as eating companions. Front. Comput. Sci. 4, 909844 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii, A., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Relationship between eating and chatting during mealtimes with a robot. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCII 2021. CCIS, vol. 1498, pp. 249–256. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber, P., Krings, K., Nießner, J., Brodesser, S., Ludwig, T.: FoodChattAR: exploring the design space of edible virtual agents for human-food interaction. In: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, pp. 638–650 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, L.E., Bargh, J.A.: Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322(5901), 606–607 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ring, L., Utami, D., Bickmore, T.: The right agent for the job?: the effects of agent visual appearance on task domain. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) Intelligent Virtual Agents: 14th International Conference, IVA 2014, Boston, MA, USA, August 27-29, 2014. Proceedings, pp. 374–384. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. ter Stal, S., Tabak, M., op den Akker, H., Beinema, T., Hermens, H.: Who do you prefer? The effect of age, gender and role on users’ first impressions of embodied conversational agents in eHealth. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(9), 881–892 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heerink, M., et al.: A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot. In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1045–1050 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lubold, N., Walker, E., Pon-Barry, H.: Effects of adapting to user pitch on rapport perception, behavior, and state with a social robotic learning companion. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 31(1), 35–73 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-020-09267-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: Persuasive robots acceptance model (PRAM): roles of social responses within the acceptance model of persuasive robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(5), 1075–1092 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: Assessing the effect of persuasive robots interactive social cues on users’ psychological reactance, liking, trusting beliefs and compliance. Adv. Robot. 33(7–8), 325–337 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoo Inoue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, JY., Inoue, T. (2023). The Similarity of Virtual Meal of a Co-eating Agent Affects Human Participant. In: Takada, H., Marutschke, D.M., Alvarez, C., Inoue, T., Hayashi, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42140-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42141-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation