Abstract
In co-eating with real people, similar food consumption was found to benefit food intake and some subjective feelings. While co-eating agents have the potential to be caregivers or companions, the discussion of meal similarity between participants and agents is lacking. In this study, to achieve better social facilitation and the sense of eating together by a co-eating agent, we focused on the effects of meal similarity on eating amount and subjective feelings. We developed co-eating agents which can eat three types of food and conducted a laboratory-based artificial co-eating experiment. The results showed that participants perceived the meal similarity and the sense of eating together to be higher when the co-eating agent eats similar virtual food. In addition, a relationship was found between food tastiness and the difference of eating amount between the conditions. We propose that creating similar foods for co-eating agents can improve the feeling of togetherness in artificial co-eating and have the potential to facilitate eating when the food is preferred.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choi, M.J., Park, Y.G., Kim, Y.H., Cho, K.H., Nam, G.E.: Eating together and health-related quality of life among korean adults. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 52, 758–765 (2020)
Ortiz–Ospina, E.: The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Our world in data (2019)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Shokuiku promotion policies: Fy2017 (white paper on shokuiku) (2017)
Ceccaldi, E., Huisman, G., Volpe, G., Mancini, M.: Guess who’s coming to dinner? surveying digital commensality during covid-19 outbreak. In: Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 317–321 (2020)
Oh, A., Erinosho, T., Dunton, G., Perna, F.M., Berrigan, D.: Cross-sectional examination of physical and social contexts of episodes of eating and drinking in a national sample of US adults. Public Health Nutr. 17(12), 2721–2729 (2014)
Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., Butera, F.: Portion size tells who i am, food type tells who you are: specific functions of amount and type of food in same-and opposite-sex dyadic eating contexts. Appetite 112, 96–101 (2017)
Woolley, K., Fishbach, A.: A recipe for friendship: similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. J. Consum. Psychol. 27, 1–10 (2017)
Wang, J.Y., Kubota, S., Inoue, T.: Effects of meal similarity on interpersonal synchronization in three-party remote dining. Front. Comput. Sci. 4, 838229 (2022)
McColl, D., Nejat, G.: A socially assistive robot that can monitor affect of the elderly during mealtime assistance. J. Med. Devices 8(3), 030941 (2014)
Randall, N., Joshi, S., Liu, X.: Health-e-eater: dinnertime companion robot and magic plate for improving eating habits in children from low–income families. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp. 361–362 (2018)
Khot, R. A., Arza, E. S., Kurra, H., Wang, Y.: Fobo: towards designing a robotic companion for solo dining. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2019)
Fujii, A., Kochigami, K., Kitagawa, S., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Development and evaluation of mixed reality co-eating system: sharing the behavior of eating food with a robot could improve our dining experience. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO–MAN), pp. 357–362 (2020)
Takahashi, M., Tanaka, H., Yamana, H., Nakajima, T.: Virtual co-eating: making solitary eating experience more enjoyable. In: Munekata, N., Kunita, I., Hoshino, J. (eds.) ICEC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10507, pp. 460–464. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66715-7_63
Boothby, E.J., Clark, M.S., Bargh, J.A.: Shared experiences are amplified. Psychol. Sci. 25(12), 2209–2216 (2014)
Niewiadomski, R., Bruijnes, M., Huisman, G., Gallagher, C.P., Mancini, M.: Social robots as eating companions. Front. Comput. Sci. 4, 909844 (2022)
Fujii, A., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Relationship between eating and chatting during mealtimes with a robot. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCII 2021. CCIS, vol. 1498, pp. 249–256. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_33
Weber, P., Krings, K., Nießner, J., Brodesser, S., Ludwig, T.: FoodChattAR: exploring the design space of edible virtual agents for human-food interaction. In: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, pp. 638–650 (2021)
Williams, L.E., Bargh, J.A.: Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322(5901), 606–607 (2008)
Ring, L., Utami, D., Bickmore, T.: The right agent for the job?: the effects of agent visual appearance on task domain. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) Intelligent Virtual Agents: 14th International Conference, IVA 2014, Boston, MA, USA, August 27-29, 2014. Proceedings, pp. 374–384. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_49
ter Stal, S., Tabak, M., op den Akker, H., Beinema, T., Hermens, H.: Who do you prefer? The effect of age, gender and role on users’ first impressions of embodied conversational agents in eHealth. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(9), 881–892 (2020)
Heerink, M., et al.: A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot. In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1045–1050 (2012)
Lubold, N., Walker, E., Pon-Barry, H.: Effects of adapting to user pitch on rapport perception, behavior, and state with a social robotic learning companion. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 31(1), 35–73 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-020-09267-3
Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: Persuasive robots acceptance model (PRAM): roles of social responses within the acceptance model of persuasive robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(5), 1075–1092 (2020)
Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: Assessing the effect of persuasive robots interactive social cues on users’ psychological reactance, liking, trusting beliefs and compliance. Adv. Robot. 33(7–8), 325–337 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, JY., Inoue, T. (2023). The Similarity of Virtual Meal of a Co-eating Agent Affects Human Participant. In: Takada, H., Marutschke, D.M., Alvarez, C., Inoue, T., Hayashi, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42140-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42141-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)