Abstract
This chapter demonstrates how the use of reflexivity is fundamental to overcoming methodological challenges in conducting qualitative research about the process of becoming a refugee woman, as well as guaranteeing that the results achieved are trustworthy. Using considerations from the fieldwork, this chapter emphasizes the major role that reflexivity assumed in the researchers’ work and inner development, namely regarding: the use of translators during the conduction of interviews; the emotional impact of the research on the researcher; the relationship between the researcher and the research; and the ordeals of collecting data during lockdowns/a global pandemic. It is argued that promoting ethical practice and methodological reliability are mutually reinforcing objectives to overcome methodological challenges in which the process of reflexivity is a central tool, as well as to enhance potentially useful outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N., & Edwards, K. (2010). Building a chain of trust: Using policy and practice to enhance trustworthy data discovery and sharing. ACM Proceedings.
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Ashby, C. (2011). Whose “voice” is it anyway? Giving voice and qualitative research involving individuals that type to communicate. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4), 1–11.
Attia, M., & Edge, J. (2017). Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: A developmental approach to research methodology. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhpp.v67i6.1406
Bansal, S., Mathendiratta, S., Kumar, S., Sarma, P. P., Prakash, A., & Medhi, B. (2019). Collaborative research in modern era: Need and challenges. Indian Journal Pharmacology, 51(3), 137–139.
Barry, C., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1990). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 26–44.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
Berger, R. (2016). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Chafetz, J. S. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of the sociology of gender. University of Houston Publications.
Chandra, Y., & Shag, L. (2017). An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 20(1), 90–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014
Cowburn, M., Gelsthorpe, L., & Wahidin, A. (2017). Research ethics in criminology: Dilemmas, issues and solutions (1st ed.). Routledge.
Edge, J. (2011). The reflexive teacher educator: Roots and wings. Routledge.
Gringeri, C., Barusch, A., & Cambron, C. (2013). Epistemology in qualitative social work research: A review of published articles. Social Work Research, 37, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svs032
Harding, S. (2015). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research (1st ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Ho, S., Holloway, A., & Stenhouse, R. (2019). Analytic methods considerations for the translation of sensitive qualitative data from Mandarin into English. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919868354
Imai, K. (2017). Quantitative social science: An introduction. Princeton University Press.
Kanal, M., & Rottmann, S. B. (2021). Everyday Agency: Rethinking Refugee Women’s Agency in Specific Cultural Contexts. Front Psychol, 12, 1–14.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Practical guidance to qualitative research: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124.
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview: Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marks, S., Mathie, E., & Smiddy, J. (2018). Reflections and experiences of a co-researcher involved in a renal research study. Research Involvement Engagement, 4(36), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0120-4
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
McGraw, L., Zvonkovic, A., & Walker, A. (2000). Studying postmodern families: A feminist analysis of ethical tensions in work and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1), 68–77.
Milner, H. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36, 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
Pang, P., Chang, S., Verspoor, K., & Clavisi, O. (2018). The use of web-based technologies in health research participation: Qualitative study of consumer and researcher experiences. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/12094
Pfaff, K., & Markak, A. (2017). Compassionate collaborative care: An integrative review of quality indicators in end-of-life care. BMC Palliative Care, 16, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0246-4
Pio, E., & Singh, S. (2016). Vulnerability and resilience: Critical reflexivity in gendered violence research. Third World Quarterly, 37, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1089166
Probst, B. (2015). The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 37–48.
Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996
Schenke, W., van Driel, J. H., Geijsel, F. P., & Volman, M. L. L. (2017). Closing the feedback loop: A productive interplay between practice-based research and school development through cross-professional collaboration in secondary education. Professional Development in Education, 43(5), 860–880.
Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277–287.
Surmiak, A. (2018). Confidentiality in qualitative research involving vulnerable participants: Researchers’ perspectives. FQS, 19(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099
Williams, E. N., & Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702113
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borges, G.M., Faria, R. (2023). Language, Emotions, and Access to Refugee Women: Ingredients for Reflexivity. In: Díaz-Fernández, A.M., Del-Real, C., Molnar, L. (eds) Fieldwork Experiences in Criminology and Security Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41573-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41574-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)