An Evaluation and Accuracy of SRTM and ASTER GDEM to Generation of Contour Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS Based on an Innovative Vision (ICRSSSA 2022)

Abstract

DEM is the basis of processing extraction of Digital relief maps. The goal of this study is evaluation of free DEM to extract contour lines, the quality and accuracy of DEM, and comfortable with the standard contour maps of scale 1:50,000 to represent the topography of the land surface, and Cartography comparison to contour from DEM and contour lines from topography maps. This study uses quantitative methods and statistics it is based on Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Error (ME). So, this Study focuses on Visualization evaluation of results of the analysis of DEM. Consideration of the accuracy of a degree of simulation of extraction contour lines from DEM and original contour lines. The accuracy was studied using 3330 elevation points using a topographic map. Results indicate that SRTM DEM, and ASTER GDEM both may be used in generation contour maps with a scale 1:50,000, so RMSE to SRTM, ASTER is 6.6 m and 8.6 m and ME is 5.1 m and 5.5 m respectively. the quality analysis showed that agreement output from free DEM with the standard accuracy of contour map 1:50,000 so can you depend on free DEM to extract a contour line with a contour interval 10 m or 20 m with scale 1:50,000 with 5 m to 10 m of the accuracy. The cartographic analysis of contour lines produced from free DEM is characterized by its compatibility with the cartographic rules for contour lines and the absence of distortions and many abnormal phenomena in it, especially when using the Global mapper program, as well as the higher details of the data of the ASTER GDEM model than the SRTM model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams, M, Y Yamaguchi and R Crippen. “ASTER Global DEM (GDEM) Version 3.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XLIII-B4 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawod, Gomaa M. and Ibrahim E Ascoura. “The Validity of Open-Source Elevations for Different Topographic Map Scales and Geomatics Applications in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.” Novel Perspectives of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences 2 (2023): 1. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367499401>.

  3. El Mhamdi, Akif, Mohammed Aarab and Abdelkhalek El Fariati. “Evaluation of the accuracy of open-source DEMs using GPS data.” International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO) (2023): 0(1):041–050.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ganie, Parvaiz Ahmad, et al. “A comparative analysis of the vertical accuracy of multiple open-source digital elevation models for the mountainous terrain of the north-western Himalaya.” Modeling Earth Systems and Environment (2023): 9:2723–2743.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gautam, Aashish. DEM and Comparison of DEM obtained from ASTER, ALOS PALSAR and SRTM. 2023. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369335112>.

  6. Grobe, Mathias, et al. “Map** MT. USHBA – How to Create a High-Quality Map Product from Open Data with free software.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLVIII-4/W1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibrahim, Majed, et al. “An evaluation of available digital elevation models (DEMs) for geomorphological feature analysis.” Environmental Earth Sciences (2020): 79:336.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kasi, Venkatesh, et al. “Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2020): 13:1050.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohsen, Mahdi Hadi. “The Use of the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in the Production of Topographic Maps a Review.” ResearchJet Journal of Analysis and Inventions 3 (2022). <https://researchjet.academiascience.org>.

  10. Pahari, Samir. “Comparative Analysis of DEMs Derived from SRTM, ASTER, and ALOS PALSAR Data: Assessment of Accuracy and Suitability for Terrain Analysis.” (2023). <www.researchgate.net/publication/369369545>.

  11. Pakoksung, Kwanchai and Masataka Takagi. “Assessment and comparison of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) products in varying topographic, land cover regions and its attribute: a case study in Shikoku Island Japan.” Modeling Earth Systems and Environment (2021): 7:465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paudel, Bipin. DEM Products – ASTER, ALOS PALSAR, SRTM, GTOPO 30. DEM comparison: Hillshade, Contour and Raster Calculation. 2023. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369453445>.

  13. Prasad, Jayashree, Apurv Vidhate and Durva Patiyat. “Visualization of a Digital Elevation Model using Advanced Image Processing.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) 10.VII (2022). <www.ijraset.com>.

  14. Sharma, Ankita and D. S. Bagri. “Comparison and Validation of Elevation Data at Selected Ground Control Points and Terrain Derivatives Derived from Different Digital Elevation Models.” Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Šiljeg, Ante, et al. “The effect of user-defined parameters on DTM accuracy—development of a hybrid model.” Applied Geomatics (2019): 11:81–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kariman Ismail .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ismail, K., Fozy, M. (2023). An Evaluation and Accuracy of SRTM and ASTER GDEM to Generation of Contour Lines. In: Gad, A.A., Elfiky, D., Negm, A., Elbeih, S. (eds) Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS Based on an Innovative Vision . ICRSSSA 2022. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40447-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation