Albert Einstein, the Kinematics of Special Relativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A History of Kinematics from Zeno to Einstein

Part of the book series: History of Mechanism and Machine Science ((HMMS,volume 46))

  • 608 Accesses

Abstract

In classical kinematics the motion of an object is a function from a time-axis to the set of possible positions of the object in space. Time is absolute in the sense that the time-axis is an omnipresent clock. When it is 12 o’clock in the origin, it is 12 o’clock in the entire space. In 1905 Einstein published a paper that shook the world. In this chapter we discuss the birth of the theory of special relativity. In order to explain the phenomena it turned out to be necessary to give up the absolute character of time and not only that. We also describe the twin-paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I owe this distinction to Janssen (2009), p. 28. For some authors this is a sensitive issue. They seem to find it misleading to use the word kinematics in the broad sense of the word. See also Janssen (2009).

  2. 2.

    Martínez (2009), p. 121.

  3. 3.

    Cf. John Stachel’s essay ‘What Song the Syrens Sang’: How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity? in Stachel (2002).

  4. 4.

    Einstein (1905), p. 891.

  5. 5.

    Ibidem.

  6. 6.

    It has been questioned whether the Michelson-Morley experiment did indeed influence Einstein in a direct way. It probably did. See Van Dongen (2009).

  7. 7.

    Einstein’s autobiography in Schilpp (1951), p. 53.

  8. 8.

    Mach (1907), p. 224.

  9. 9.

    Miller (1981), p. 393.

  10. 10.

    Josef Sauter, 50 Jahre Relativitätstheorie, Reprinted in Flükiger (1974), p. 156.

  11. 11.

    Galison (2000), p. 365.

  12. 12.

    The introduction of the new variable x’ = x − v ⋅ t has led to discussions in the literature. See Miller (1981), pp. 208–209 and Martínez (2009), pp. 325–331.

  13. 13.

    Lorentz (1913), p. 36.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teun Koetsier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koetsier, T. (2024). Albert Einstein, the Kinematics of Special Relativity. In: A History of Kinematics from Zeno to Einstein. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39872-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39872-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39871-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39872-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation