Abstract
This chapter discusses the concept of construction grammar, which concerns the tendency of words to group together to form ‘constructions’ that have meanings of their own. These meanings relate to everyday experience and exist in radial categories. In first language acquisition, knowledge of constructions is acquired through interaction, and the language data that this interaction provides are thought to be analysed through pattern-finding and intention-reading skills. Although the data available to second language learners are different from those available to infants learning their first language, recent research has shown that this usage-based account of language acquisition is highly relevant. This chapter discusses the potential applications of construction grammars, and the theories as to how they are acquired, to second language learning, in both classroom-based and more naturalistic settings. It assesses the findings from studies that have explored the benefits of explicitly introducing second language learners to second language constructions. It also discusses the role played by gesture in constructions and examines the role played by ‘multimodal’ constructions in second language learning and teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achard, M. (2008). Teaching Construal: Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 432–455). Routledge.
Beck, S., Krasikova, S., Fleischer, D., Gergel, R., Hofstetter, S., Savelsberg, C., Vanderlest, J., & Villalta, E. (2009). Crosslinguistic Variation in Comparison Constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 9(1), 1–66.
Bergen, B., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding. In J.-O. Ostman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (pp. 147–190). John Benjamins.
Broccias, C. (2008). Cognitive Linguistic Theories of Grammar and Grammar Teaching. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 67–90). Mouton de Gruyter.
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. (2005). Fast Map** Between a Phrasal Form and Meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500–508.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2022). Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge University Press.
De Knop, S. (2020). The Embodied Teaching of Complex Verbal Constructions with German Placement Verbs and Spatial Prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 131–161.
Dixon, R. M. (2008). Comparative Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Studies in Language. International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 32(4), 787–817.
Ellis, N. (2006a). Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24.
Ellis, N. (2006b). Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cuecompetition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking, and Perceptual Learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.
Ellis, N. (2006c). Cognitive Perspectives on SLA. AILA Review, 19, 100–121.
Ellis, N. (2013). Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford University Press.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishments: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819.
Gilquin, G. (2016). Input-Dependent L2 Acquisition: Causative Constructions in English as a Foreign and Second Language. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 115–148). Mouton de Gruyter.
Gilquin, G. (2022a). Cognitive Corpus Linguistics and Pedagogy: From Rationale to Applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, 3(2), 109–142.
Gilquin, G. (2022b). Data-Driven Learning One’s Way Through Constructions. In Cognition and Contrast: Festschrift for/für Prof. Dr. Sabine De Knop (p. 197). Presses de l’Université Saint-Louis.
Gilquin, G. (2022c). Constructing Learner Speech: On the Use of Spoken Data in Applied Construction Grammar. In Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and Teaching (With) Constructions (pp. 73–96). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Goldberg, A. (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton University Press.
Herbst, T. (2016). Foreign Language Learning Is Construction Learning – What Else? Moving Towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 22–38). Mouton de Gruyter.
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopper, P. (2001). Grammatical Constructions and Their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance? In M. Putz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy (pp. 109–129). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hunston, S. (2019). Patterns, Constructions and Applied Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 324–353.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1999). Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. John Benjamins.
Hunston, S., & Su, H. (2019). Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 567–593.
Hunston, S., Herbst, T., Schmid, H. J., & Faulhaber, S. (2014). Pattern Grammar in Context. In Constructions Collocations Patterns (pp. 99–120). Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Grammar (Cognitive Prerequisites) (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1991). Wi** the Slate Clean: A Lexical- Semantic Exploration. Cognition, 42, 123–151.
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. The State of ELT and a Way Forward. LTP Teacher Training.
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K., & Torrent, T. T. (Eds.). (2018). Constructicography: Constructicon Development Across Languages (Vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nakamura, D. (2008). Awareness, Input Frequency, and Construction Learning: A Replication and Extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) to Adult Second Language Acquisition. In Cognitive Approaches to Second/Foreign Language Processing: Theory and Pedagogy. Papers from the 33rd International LAUD Symposium, Landau, Germany, March 2008 (pp. 464–481). LAUD Linguistic Agency.
Patten, A., & McSorley, E. (2019). Addressing the Vocabulary Gap Using the Pattern Grammar Approach. Impact, 6.
Patten, A., & Perek, F. (2022). Pedagogic Applications of the English Constructicon. Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Learning and Teaching (With) Constructions (pp. 179–215). Mouton de Gruyter.
Perek, F., & Patten, A. L. (2019). Towards an English Constructicon: Using Patterns and Frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 354–384.
Ro, E., & Kim, H. (2021). The Effects of Extensive Reading on Young Korean Students’ Construction Development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(4), 957–981.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. (2007). Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. In V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 75–105). Equinox.
Sung, M.-C., & Yang, H.-K. (2016). Effects of Construction-Centred Instruction on Korean Students’ Learning of English Transitive Resultative Constructions. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 89–113). Mouton de Gruyter.
Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. Routledge.
Tyler, A., Ho, V. And Mueller, C.M. (2011). Using cognitive linguistics to teach the double object construction. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Ammerican Association for Linguistics, Chicago (March 2011).
Waara, R. (2004). Construal, Convention and Constructions in L2 Speech. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 51–76). Mouton de Gruyter.
Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Littlemore, J. (2023). ‘Oscar sent Venice an elephant’: Construction Grammars and Second Language Learning. In: Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39796-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39796-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39796-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)