Abstract
Researchers across nearly every discipline seek to leverage ontologies for knowledge discovery and computational tasks; yet, the number of machine readable materials science ontologies is limited. The work presented in this paper explores the Processing, Structure, Properties and Performance (PSPP) framework for accelerating the development of materials science ontologies. We pursue a case study framed by the creation of an Aerogel ontology and a Battery Cathode ontology and demonstrate the Hel** Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineer for Materials Science (HIVE4MAT) as a proof of concept showing PSPP relationships. The paper includes background context covering materials science, the PSPP framework, and faceted analysis for ontologies. We report our research objectives, methods, research procedures, and results. The findings indicate that the PSPP framework offers a rubric that may help guide and potentially accelerate ontology development.
This work is supported by NSF-OAC 2118201, NSF-IIS 1815256.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sciences, Medicine, others. frontiers of materials research A decadal survey. National Academies Press (2019)
Ghosh, S., Panigrahi, P.: Use of Ranganathan’s analytico-synthetic approach in develo** a domain ontology in library and information science (2015)
Zhao, X., Lopez, S., Saikin, S., Hu, X., Greenberg, J.: Text to insight accelerating organic materials knowledge extraction via deep learning. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sc. Technol. 58(1), 558–562 (2021)
Author, A.-B.: Contribution title. In: 9th International Proceedings on Proceedings, pp. 1–2 (2010)
Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A., Rinke, P.: Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv. Sci. 6(21), 1900808 (2019)
Kumaraguru, S., Rachuri, S., Lechevalier, D.: Faceted classification of manufacturing processes for sustainability performance evaluation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75, 1309–1320 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6184-x
Zhao, X., Greenberg, J., Meschke, V., Toberer, E., Hu, X.: An exploratory analysis: extracting materials science knowledge from unstructured scholarly data. Electron. Libr. 39, 469–485 (2021)
Simperler, A., Goldbeck, G.: OntoTrans benefits for industry (2021)
Materials Genome Initiative strategic plan: Executive Office of the President. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology, Subcommittee on the Materials Genome Initiative (2021)
Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A.: Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm’’ of science in materials science. Apl Materials 4(5), 053208 (2016)
Hey, A., Tansley, S., Tolle, K., et al.: The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. (Vol. 1) Microsoft research Redmond, WA (2009)
Obo foundry. http://www.obofoundry.org/
Ncbo bioportal. http://bioportal.bioontology.org/
Bliss, H., et al.: System of bibliographic classification (1935)
Dewey, M.: A classification and subject index, for cataloguing and arranging the books and pamphlets of a library. Brick row book shop, Incorporated (1876)
Falcon, A.: Aristotle on causality (2006)
Feng, J., et al.: Printed aerogels: chemistry, processing, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(6), 3842–3888 (2021)
Hawley, W., Li, J.: Electrode manufacturing for lithium-ion batteries-analysis of current and next generation processing. J. Energy Storage 25, 100862 (2019)
Bayerlein, B., et al.: A perspective on digital knowledge representation in materials science and engineering. Adv. Eng. Mater. 24, 2101176 (2022)
Guerrini, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, devised by Melvil Dewey, Ed. 22. Bollettino AIB (1992–2011), 44(2), 199–201 (2004)
Ranganathan, S.R.: Colon classification. In: Madras Library Association, vol. 1933, p. 1v (1933)
Greenberg, J., Zhao, X., Adair, J., Boone, J., Hu, X.: HIVE-4-MAT: advancing the ontology infrastructure for materials science. In Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research, pp. 297–307 (2020)
La Barre, K.: The use of faceted analytico-synthetic theory as revealed in the practice of website construction and design. Indiana University (2006)
Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2013–15
Fidel, R.: The case study method: a case study. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 6(3), 273–288 (1984)
Ashino, T.: Materials ontology: an infrastructure for exchanging materials information and knowledge. Data Sci. J. 9, 54–61 (2010)
Vet, P., Speel, P., Mars, N.: The Plinius ontology of ceramic materials. In: Eleventh European Conference On Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1994) Workshop On Comparison Of Implemented Ontologies, pp. 8–12 (1994)
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by NSF-OAC 2118201, NSF-IIS 1815256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Greenberg, J. et al. (2023). Materials Science Ontology Design with an Analytico-Synthetic Facet Analysis Framework. In: Garoufallou, E., Vlachidis, A. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1789. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39141-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39141-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39140-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39141-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)