Fractal Organizations and Employee-Organization Relationship Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time and Fractals

Abstract

Today, most organizations increasingly act as living systems in nature. This process reflects the growth of human awareness of mutual relationships between employees and organizations. The variety of distinct elements and the diversity of relationships in the structure of dynamic management systems can be very complicated. This chapter aims to theoretically explain the relationship between the two areas of the fractal organizations and the employee-organization relationship (EOR) based on the commonalities of the two mentioned areas. This aim is done with a descriptive analytical approach by reviewing library studies. From a theoretical point of view, the findings of this chapter can be used to expand the research area of EOR by focusing on the dynamics and stability of organizational relationships and creating an effective fractal organization, based on the findings of this chapter in explaining the commonalities between the EOR and fractal organizations, demonstratively develo** and growing organizational and interpersonal relationships facilitated through the alignment of the employee’s and organization’s goals and interests. Correspondingly, both parties of the relationship, whether the individual or the organization, believe that they contribute to the desirability and stability of the relationship; hence, they are required to meet the other party’s expectations. The findings explain the seven general commonalities of the two areas of the fractal organization and EOR: the requirement to have a pattern of organizational behavior, the integrity of goals and the unity of individual’s and organization’s interests, requirements of leader’s/manager’s role, the importance of individual’s role, the structure of governing interpersonal and organizational relationships, dynamics of information and background knowledge of dynamics of relationships in fractal organizations, and the importance of mutual trust as a facilitating factor. Realization and accessibility of fast and successful organizational goals can be facilitated by providing a better understanding and develo** a basic knowledge of these commonalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nucor corporation is one of the most successful American steel companies, of industrial materials ranked 138 out of 500 in 2012, and is the largest recycler (www.nucor.com) in North America.

  2. 2.

    Here, Myers-Briggs’s assessment is a good instrument for leaders to use.

References

  • Alvani, S. M. (2013). Public management, Nei Publications, 47th edition, Tehran. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardarova, S., & Ivana, S. (2019). Managers role in achieving balance between people and organization. In 50th International scientific conference contemporary economic trends: Technological development and challenges of competitiveness (18 October 2019, pp. 199–205).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). Functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, W., & Kaszkin-Bettag, M. (2010). Coherence and health care cos-RCA actuarial study: A cost-effectiveness cohort study. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 16(4), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., Spreitzer, G. M., & Cummings, T. G. (2001). The future of leadership: Today’s top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow’s leaders (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Nichol, L. (1996). On dialogue (1st ed.). Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, B. (2007). Information dynamics: Why we are here. Available at: http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/user_id/custerw/action/tableofcontents.

  • Faghih, N. (2006). Secrets of transformation and development in human systems (new approach). Navid Shiraz Publishing. ISBN 964-358-265-5. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Flake, G. W. (2000). The computational beauty of nature: Computer exploration of fractals, chaos, complex systems, and adaptation. The MIT Press. Reprint edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, T. L. (2017). Employee–organization relationship. In The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc069.

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm ofreciprocity. American Sociologica/Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2021). Organizational behavior (S.M. Alvani, G. H. R. Memarzadeh, Trans.), Marwarid Publications, 27th edition, Tehran. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, W. W., & Sahtouris, E. (1998). Biology revisioned. North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. The Institute for Public Relations/Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, T. (2010). Delivering happiness: A path to profits, passion, and purpose. Business Plus/Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, K., & Varian, T. (1998). Plain talk: Lessons from a business maverick. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (2004). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, B. H. (2005). The biology of belief: Unleashing the power of consciousness, matter and miracles. Mountain of Love Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D., King, J., & Fischer-Wright, H. (2008). Tribal leadership: Leveraging natural groups to build a thriving organisation. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, P. (2004). An introduction to fractal dynamics. Journal of Human Values, 10(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organisation, your management style, and your life. Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, B. R. (2011). The impact of leadership in applying systems thinking to organisations. In Proceeding of the 55th annual conference of the international society for the systems sciences. International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Men, R. L., & Robinson, K. L. (2018). It’s about how employees feel! Examining the impact of emotional culture on employee–organization relationships. Corporate Communications: An In-ternational Journal, 4(23), 470–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, R. L., & Sung, Y. (2019). Sha** corporate character through symmetrical communication: The effects on employee-organization relationships. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteanu, N. R., Facia, A., Torrebruno, G., & Torrebruno, F. (2019). Fractals – A smart financial tool to assess business management decisions. Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, 13(1), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobari, N. (2009). Explaining the behavior pattern of the organization using the concepts of complexity theory, Doctoral thesis in the field of business management, orientation of organizational behavior and human resources management, Allameh Tabatabayi University. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pert, C. (1997). Molecules of emotion: Why you feel the way you feel. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raye, J. (2014). Fractal organization theory. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 11(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1179/1477963313Z.00000000025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezazadeh, F. et al. (2022b). The pattern of employee – Organization relationship based on positive organizatinal behavior. The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Public Administration – Organizational Behavior. Faculty of Management and Accounting. Allameh Tabataba’i University. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezazadeh, F., Seyyed Naghvi, M. A., Alvani, S. M., & Hosseinpour, D. (2022a). Designing the model of employee-organization relationship based on positive organizational behavior approach (case study: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences). Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(4), 131–165. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezazadeh, F., Seyyed Naghvi, M. A., Alvani, S. M., & Hosseinpour, D. (2022c). Analysis and forecasting of the future employee-organization relationship: A systematic literature review. Organizational Resource Management Researchs, 12(1), 81–106. [in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2010). Employee-organization relationship in collective entrepreneurship: An overview. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(4), 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, K., Son, Y. J., & Jung, M. (2003). Framework for fractal -based supply chain management of e-biz companies. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 14(8), 720–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280310001647913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 668–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, S., & Hasgall, A. (2005). Knowledge workers as fractals in a complex adaptive organization. Knowledge and Process Management, 12(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L., Coyle-shapiro, J., & Tetric, L. (2012). The employee – Organization relationship applications for the 21st century (1st ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skydan, O., Nykolyuk, O., Chaikin, O., & Shukalovych, V. (2021). Concept of fractal organization of organic business systems. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 7(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation, 1st edn. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 5(40),108s–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. B., Hom, P. W., Tetrick, L. E., Shore, L. M., Jia, L., Li, C., & Song, L. J. (2006). The norm of reciprocity: Scale development and validation in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review., 2(3), 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1998). Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnecke, H. J. (1993). The Fractal company: A revolution in corporate culture (Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Mei, Q., & Liu, S. (2019). Study of the influence of employee safety voice on workplace safety level of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Nankai Business Review International, 10(1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Rezazadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rezazadeh, F., Rezazadeh, S., Rezazadeh, M. (2023). Fractal Organizations and Employee-Organization Relationship Dynamics. In: Faghih, N. (eds) Time and Fractals . Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38188-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation