From Hedging to Balancing: Australia’s China Policy and Implications for US-China Rivalry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ascendancy of Regional Powers in Contemporary US-China Relations

Part of the book series: Global Foreign Policy Studies ((GFPS))

  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

For more than a decade, Australia was able to find a balanced position between China–its largest economic partner–and the United States–its core security ally. Before the outbreak of the COVID-19 global pandemic, Canberra hedged its economic and security bets between China and the United States rather successfully, with Australian top policymakers announcing that the country would not have to choose between the two great powers and that there are ways to maintain a tight alliance with the US while enhancing friendship and cooperation with China. Such a foreign policy stance, while not without problems, contributed to the mitigation of US-China rivalry in the Asia-Pacific. However, Australia-China relations started to gradually deteriorate starting from 2016, with Canberra giving up on hedging after the COVID-19 pandemic by signing the AUKUS (Australia-UK-US) security pact that has been widely received as an effort to contain China. This chapter explores this shift in Australia’s foreign policy, paying attention to how it affects the US-China rivalry. It conceptualises the shift as a transition from hedging to anti-China balancing and demonstrates how Australia’s role has evolved from mitigating to exacerbating that rivalry as an outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some rare exceptions trying to tackle this question indirectly are Ciorciari (2019), Korolev (2019), Smith (2020).

  2. 2.

    Transition to bandwagoning is also possible depending on the nature of the middle powers’ relations with the competing great powers, see Korolev (2019).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Korolev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Korolev, A. (2023). From Hedging to Balancing: Australia’s China Policy and Implications for US-China Rivalry. In: Roberts, K., Bano, S. (eds) The Ascendancy of Regional Powers in Contemporary US-China Relations . Global Foreign Policy Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37612-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation