Robust Educational Dialogue Act Classifiers with Low-Resource and Imbalanced Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Abstract

Dialogue acts (DAs) can represent conversational actions of tutors or students that take place during tutoring dialogues. Automating the identification of DAs in tutoring dialogues is significant to the design of dialogue-based intelligent tutoring systems. Many prior studies employ machine learning models to classify DAs in tutoring dialogues and invest much effort to optimize the classification accuracy by using limited amounts of training data (i.e., low-resource data scenario). However, beyond the classification accuracy, the robustness of the classifier is also important, which can reflect the capability of the classifier on learning the patterns from different class distributions. We note that many prior studies on classifying educational DAs employ cross entropy (CE) loss to optimize DA classifiers on low-resource data with imbalanced DA distribution. The DA classifiers in these studies tend to prioritize accuracy on the majority class at the expense of the minority class which might not be robust to the data with imbalanced ratios of different DA classes. To optimize the robustness of classifiers on imbalanced class distributions, we propose to optimize the performance of the DA classifier by maximizing the area under the ROC curve (AUC) score (i.e., AUC maximization). Through extensive experiments, our study provides evidence that (i) by maximizing AUC in the training process, the DA classifier achieves significant performance improvement compared to the CE approach under low-resource data, and (ii) AUC maximization approaches can improve the robustness of the DA classifier under different class imbalance ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FP, Positive FeedbackWell done!”, same abbreviation from [25].

  2. 2.

    Our study has 31 dialogue acts as the classes to be classified.

References

  1. Al-Luhaybi, M., Yousefi, L., Swift, S., Counsell, S., Tucker, A.: Predicting academic performance: a bootstrap** approach for learning dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11625, pp. 26–36. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer, K., Ha, E.Y., Phillips, R., Wallis, M., Vouk, M., Lester, J.: Dialogue act modeling in a complex task-oriented domain. In: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference, pp. 297–305 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalcanti, A.P., et al.: How good is my feedback? A content analysis of written feedback. In: Proceedings of the LAK, LAK 2020, pp. 428–437. ACM, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Mello, S., Olney, A., Person, N.: Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. J. Educ. Data Min. 2(1), 1–37 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Du Boulay, B., Luckin, R.: Modelling human teaching tactics and strategies for tutoring systems: 14 years on. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 393–404 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ezen-Can, A., Boyer, K.E.: Understanding student language: an unsupervised dialogue act classification approach. J. Educ. Data Min. 7(1), 51–78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ezen-Can, A., Grafsgaard, J.F., Lester, J.C., Boyer, K.E.: Classifying student dialogue acts with multimodal learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the Fifth LAK, pp. 280–289 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, J., et al.: Is it a good move? Mining effective tutoring strategies from human–human tutorial dialogues. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 127, 194–207 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, J., et al.: Enhancing educational dialogue act classification with discourse context and sample informativeness. IEEE TLT (under reviewing process)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Min, W., et al.: Predicting dialogue acts for intelligent virtual agents with multimodal student interaction data. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, N.D., Tan, W., Buntine, W., Beare, R., Chen, C., Du, L.: AUC maximization for low-resource named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nye, B.D., Graesser, A.C., Hu, X.: Autotutor and family: a review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 427–469 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nye, B.D., Morrison, D.M., Samei, B.: Automated session-quality assessment for human tutoring based on expert ratings of tutoring success. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raković, M., et al.: Towards the automated evaluation of legal casenote essays. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2022. LNCS, vol. 13355, pp. 167–179. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rus, V., Maharjan, N., Banjade, R.: Dialogue act classification in human-to-human tutorial dialogues. In: Innovations in Smart Learning. LNET, pp. 183–186. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rus, V., et al.: An analysis of human tutors’ actions in tutorial dialogues. In: The Thirtieth International Flairs Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Samei, B., Li, H., Keshtkar, F., Rus, V., Graesser, A.C.: Context-based speech act classification in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 236–241. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Samei, B., Rus, V., Nye, B., Morrison, D.M.: Hierarchical dialogue act classification in online tutoring sessions. In: EDM, pp. 600–601 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sha, L., et al.: Is the latest the greatest? A comparative study of automatic approaches for classifying educational forum posts. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 1–14 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tan, W., Du, L., Buntine, W.: Diversity enhanced active learning with strictly proper scoring rules. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 10906–10918 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, W., et al.: Does informativeness matter? Active learning for educational dialogue act classification. In: Wang, N., et al. (eds.) AIED 2023. LNAI, vol. 13916, pp. 176–188. Springer, Cham (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taori, R., Dave, A., Shankar, V., Carlini, N., Recht, B., Schmidt, L.: Measuring robustness to natural distribution shifts in image classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 18583–18599 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vail, A.K., Grafsgaard, J.F., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Lester, J.C.: Predicting learning from student affective response to tutor questions. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9684, pp. 154–164. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Vail, A.K., Boyer, K.E.: Identifying effective moves in tutoring: on the refinement of dialogue act annotation schemes. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 199–209. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., Rosé, C.P.: When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cogn. Sci. 31(1), 3–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, T., Ying, Y.: AUC maximization in the era of big data and AI: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(8) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3554729

  28. Ying, Y., Wen, L., Lyu, S.: Stochastic online AUC maximization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan, Z., Yan, Y., Sonka, M., Yang, T.: Large-scale robust deep AUC maximization: a new surrogate loss and empirical studies on medical image classification. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF ICCV, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 3020–3029. IEEE Computer Society (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan, Z., Guo, Z., Chawla, N., Yang, T.: Compositional training for end-to-end deep AUC maximization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=gPvB4pdu_Z

  31. Zhao, L., et al.: METS: multimodal learning analytics of embodied teamwork learning. In: LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 186–196 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Tan or Ngoc Dang Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lin, J. et al. (2023). Robust Educational Dialogue Act Classifiers with Low-Resource and Imbalanced Datasets. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation