Abstract
Develo** and implementing artificial intelligence (AI) systems in an ethical manner faces several challenges specific to the kind of technology at hand, including ensuring that decision-making systems making use of machine learning are just, fair, and intelligible, and are aligned with our human values. Given that values vary across cultures, an additional ethical challenge is to ensure that these AI systems are not developed according to some unquestioned but questionable assumption of universal norms but are in fact compatible with the societies in which they operate. This is particularly pertinent for AI research and implementation across Africa, a ground where AI systems are and will be used but also a place with a history of imposition of outside values. In this chapter, we thus critically examine one proposal for ensuring that decision-making systems are just, fair, and intelligible—that we adopt a principle of explicability to generate specific recommendations—to assess whether the principle should be adopted in an African research context. We argue that a principle of explicability not only can contribute to responsible and thoughtful development of AI that is sensitive to African interests and values, but can also advance tackling some of the computational challenges in machine learning research. In this way, the motivation for ensuring that a machine learning-based system is just, fair, and intelligible is not only to meet ethical requirements, but also to make effective progress in the field itself.
This chapter is a reprint of Carman, M., Rosman, B. Applying a principle of explicability to AI research in Africa: should we do it?. Ethics Inf Technol 23, 107–117 (2021).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Africa is, of course, a vast continent with many different cultures and peoples. While we talk of ‘Africa’ in this paper for ease of reference, we do not deny that within Africa there is great complexity.
- 2.
The guidelines and frameworks surveyed are: The Asilomar AI Principles (2017), the Montreal Declaration for Responsible AI (2017), the General Principles in the IEEE Global Initiative’s ‘Ethically Aligned Design’ (2017), the Ethical Principles in the ‘Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and “Autonomous” Systems’ of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2018), the principles of the ‘AI in the UK: Ready, willing and able?’ report of the UK House of Lords Artificial Intelligence Committee (2018), and the Tenets of the Partnership on AI (2018).
- 3.
This question is an ethical question. There are, of course, questions about legal accountability and responsibility but we do not attend to them in this chapter.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
References
Abbott, J., & Martinus, L. (2019). Benchmarking neural machine translation for southern African languages. In Proceedings of the 2019 workshop on widening NLP.
Andoh, C. (2011). Bioethics and the challenges to its growth in Africa. Open Journal of Philosophy, 1(2), 67–75.
Asilomar AI Principles. (2017). Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., et al. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59.
Barugahare, J. (2018). African bioethics: Methodological doubts and insights. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0338-6
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Behrens, K. (2013). Towards an indigenous African bioethics. The South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 6(1), 32–35.
Biko, S. (2002). I write what I like: Selected writings. University of Chicago Press.
Bostrom, N. (2003). Ethical issues in advanced artificial intelligence. In I. Smit et al. (Eds.), Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making in humans and in artificial intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 12–17). International Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics.
Brown, B. J., Przybylski, A. A., Manescu, P., Caccioli, F., Oyinloye, G., Elmi, M., Shaw, M. J., et al. (2019). Data-driven malaria prevalence prediction in large densely-populated urban holoendemic sub-Saharan West Africa: Harnessing machine learning approaches and 22-years of prospectively collected data. ar**v preprint ar**v:1906.07502.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, PMLR, 81, pp. 77–91.
Chukwuneke, F. N., Umeora, O. U. J., Maduabuchi, J. U., & Egbunike, N. (2014). Global bioethics and culture in a pluralistic world: How does culture influence bioethics in Africa? Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 4(5), 672–675.
Crawford, K. (2017). The trouble with bias. NIPS 2017 Keynote Address. Retrieved August 19, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMym_BKWQzk
Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538, 311–313.
Deep Learning Indaba. (2019). Together we build African AI: Outcomes of the 2nd annual Deep Learning Indaba. Retrieved March 1, 2020 from https://www.deeplearningindaba.com/uploads/1/0/2/6/102657286/annualindaba2018report-v1.pdf
Department of Transport. (2012). SA learner driver manual: Rules of the road. SA Department of Transport.
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. (2018). Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous systems’. European Commission. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://ec.europa.eu/research/ege/pdf/ege_ai_statement_2018.pdf
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707.
Friedman, B., Hendry, D., & Borning, A. (2017). A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends in Human Computer Interaction, 11(23), 63–125.
Gbadegesin, S. (1991). African philosophy: Traditional Yoruba philosophy and contemporary African realities. Peter Lang.
Gyekye, K. (1987). An essay on African philosophical thought: The Akan conceptual scheme. Cambridge University Press.
Hellsten, S. (2006). Global bioethics: Utopia or reality? Develo** World Bioethics, 8(2), 70–81.
House of Lords Artificial Intelligence Committee. (2018). AI in the UK: Ready, willing and able? UK Parliament. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldai/100/100.pdf
IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. (2019). Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritising human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems (1st ed.). Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org
Kroll, J. A. (2018). The fallacy of inscrutability. Philosophical Transactions A, 276, 20180084.
Landhuis, E. (2017). Tanzania gears up to become a nation of medical drones. npr.org. Retrieved February 28, 2020 from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/08/24/545589328/tanzaniagears-up-to-become-a-nation-of-medical-drones
London, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: Accuracy versus explainability. Hastings Center Report, 49(1), 15–21.
Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press.
Mbiti, J. (1990). African religions and philosophy (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Microsoft. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Africa: An opportunity for growth, development and democratisation. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://info.microsoft.com/ME-DIGTRNS-WBNRFY19-11Nov-02-AIinAfrica-MGC0003244_01RegistrationForminBody.html
Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence. (2017). Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/the-declaration
Moodley, K. (2007). Microbicide research in develo** countries: Have we given the ethical concerns due consideration? BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-10
Murove, M. F. (2005). African bioethics: An explanatory discourse. Journal for the Study of Religion, 18(1), 16–36.
Partnership on AI. (2018). Tenets. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://www.partnershiponai.org/tenets
Rakotsoane, F., & Van Niekerk, A. (2017). Human life invaluableness: An emerging African bioethical principle. South African Journal of Philosophy, 36(2), 252–262.
Ramose, M. (2005). African philosophy through Ubuntu (Revised ed.). Mond Books Publishers.
Selbst, A. D., & Powles, J. (2017). Meaningful information and the right to explanation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(4), 233–242.
Senghor, L. (1988). Ce Que Je Crois. Grasset.
Sloane, M., & Moss, E. (2019). AI’s social sciences deficit. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 330–331.
Steyn, L. (2018). Watch your job, the bots are coming. Mail & Guardian, December 8. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://mg.co.za/article/2017-12-08-00-watch-your-job-the-bots-are-coming
United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. (2015). Health sector strategic plan July 2015–June 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2020 from https://www.moh.go.tz/en/strategic-plans
Wa’Thiongo, N. (1986). Decolonising the mind. James Curry.
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics. Science Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080
Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions A, 376, 20180085.
World Health Organisation (WHO). (2020). Guidelines on reproductive health research and partners’ agreement. Sexual and Reproductive Health. Retrieved February 21, 2020 from https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/ethics/partners_guide_serg/en/
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank participants at the Third CAIR Symposium on AI Research and Society held at the University of Johannesburg in March 2019, for feedback and discussion on an earlier version of the paper. We would also like to thank the two reviewers and editors for the journal Ethics and Information Technology for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests: Benjamin Rosman is one of the founders and organisers of the Deep Learning Indaba that we mention as an example of the growth of machine learning across Africa.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carman, M., Rosman, B. (2023). Applying a Principle of Explicability to AI Research in Africa: Should We Do It?. In: Attoe, A.D., Temitope, S.S., Nweke, V., Umezurike, J., Chimakonam, J.O. (eds) Conversations on African Philosophy of Mind, Consciousness and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36163-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36163-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36162-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36163-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)