Abstract
This chapter examines other possible sources of postmodern grievance and intersectional remuneration. Their specification justifies more identities that could be potentially disadvantaged. In the postmodern tradition, proof of a valid grievance is sufficient if a person’s feelings have been offended. Whether a perceived grievance becomes a transaction cost and rises to the level of market failure is an empirical question that could bankrupt many entrepreneurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacon, L. (2010). Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth about Your Weight. Ben Bella Books.
Beauvoir, S. (1974). The Second Sex (H. Parshley, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Bell, D. (2008). And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. Basic Books.
Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble. Routledge.
Campbell, F. (2012). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Ableism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Connell, C. (2010). Doing, Undoing or Redoing Gender? Gender & Society, 24(1), 31–55.
Connell, R. (2018). Masculinities. Vancouver: Langara College.
Cooper, C. (2016). Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement. Hammer On Press.
Coveney, J., & Booth, S. (2019). Critical Dietetics and Critical Nutrition Studies (p. 18). Spring.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(1989), 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Map** the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Crenshaw, K. (2018). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. Feminist Legal Theory, pp. 57–80.
Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (2001). Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New Press.
Farrell, A. (2011). Fat Shame: Stigma and the Fat Body in American Culture. New York University Press.
Foucault, M. (1969). The Archaeology of Knowledge (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1973). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon.
Friedan, B. (2013). The Feminine Mystique. W. W. Norton & Company.
Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability Studies: Theorizing Disablism and Ableism. Routledge.
Greer, G. (2012). The Female Eunuch. Fourth Estate.
hooks, b. (1996). Postmodern Blackness. In W. Anderson (Ed.), The Fontana Postmodernism Reader. Fontana Press.
Kimmel, M. (1995). The Politics of Manhood: Profeminist Men Respond to the Mythopoetic Men’s Movement (and the Mythopoetic Leaders Answer). Temple University Press.
Kupers, T. (2005). Toxic Masculinity as a Barrier to Mental Health Treatment in Prison. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(6).
Lorber, J. (2006). Shifting Paradigms and Challenging Categories. Social Problems, 53(4), 448.
Lyotard, J. (1997). Postmodern Fables (G. Van Den Abbele, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
McRuer, R., & Berube, M. (2006). Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York University Press.
Murphy, T., Patrick, J. and Llewelyn, S. (2010). Companion to Psychiatric Studies (Eigth Edition). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-3137-3.00012-7
Oliver, M., Sapey, B., & Thomas, P. (2012). Social Work with Disabled People. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2017). Key Concepts in Gender Studies. Sage.
Pluckrose, H., & Lindsay, J. (2020). Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity—and Why This Harms Everybody. Pitchstone Publishing.
Risman, B. (2018). Good News! Attitudes Moving Toward Gender Equality. Psychology Today. www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/gender-questions/20182/good-news-attitudes-moving-toward-gender-equality.
Rothblum, E., & Solovay, S. (Eds.). (2009). The Fat Studies Reader. New York University Press.
Scuro, J. (2019). Addressing Ableism: Philosophical Questions via Disability Studies. Lexington Books.
Tovar, V. (2018). You Have the Right to Remain Fat (pp. 67–68). Feminist Press.
Wainer, D. (2022, December 20). Drug Trial Surprise Could Put Madrgal in Big Pharma’s Sights. Wall Street Journal, B10.
Walters, S. (2018). Why Can’t We Hate Men? Washington Post, June 8, 2018. Available at: www.washsingtonpost.com/opinions/why-cant-we-hate-men/2018/06/08/fla3a8e0-6451-11e8-a69c-b944de66dc7_story.html?noredirect=on.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender and Society, 1(2) pp. all.
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. Free Press.
Zeihan, P. (2022). The End of the World Is Just the Beginning. Harper Business.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiet, J.O. (2023). Feminisms, Gender, Disability, and Fat Studies as Postmodern Concerns. In: Entrepreneurship in a Time of Social Justice Advocacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35463-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35463-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35462-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35463-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)