Introduction: Transnational Modernism, Comparative Methodologies, and Theories of Time on the World Literary Stage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Modernism and Poetics of Time

Part of the book series: New Comparisons in World Literature ((NCWL))

  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

Modernism and Poetics of Time: Bergson, Tanpınar, Benjamin, Walser is about modernists from Turkish, French and German literary traditions, who were burdened by an extreme consciousness of time and who shared a common skepticism of modernity’s temporal ideology that valorizes newness, rupture, and linear teleological conception of time. The book explores the conceptualization of time in the early twentieth-century literature and thought, based on a transnational and translational model of literary history. These uneasy modern writers—Henri Bergson, Walter Benjamin, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar and Robert Walser—each from different linguistic, cultural and national backgrounds, provide a radical critique of time regimes, or chronometries, which calibrate time in singular temporal narratives. In this chapter, I show that the modernists in this study invite us to rethink time at a time of devastating transformation and war, and to consider temporal multiplicities in cultural periodicity and in political modernities. The chapter also provides an overview of the question of time in modernist literature and modernist studies. It finally introduces the questions of Eurochronology and periodization as they relate to the current debates in world literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985), 95.

  2. 2.

    For recent work on technology and modernist aesthetics, see David Bradshaw, Laura Marcus, and Rebecca Roach, eds., Moving Modernisms: Motion, Technology, and Modernity (Oxford University Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714170.001.0001. On modernism and the literary market, see Rod Rosenquist, Modernism, the Market and the Institution of the New (Cambridge University Press, 2009). On modernism and empire, see Howard J. Booth and Nigel Rigby, Modernism and Empire: Writing and British Coloniality 1890–1940 (Manchester University Press, 2000); John Marx, The Modernist Novel and the Decline of Empire (Cambridge University Press, 2005); Jon Hegglund, World Views: Metageographies of Modernist Fiction (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); and Saikat Majumdar, Prose of the World: Modernism and the Banality of Empire (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013). On modernism and war, see Paul K. Saint-Amour, Tense Future: Modernism, Total War, Encyclopedic Form (Oxford University Press, 2015).

  3. 3.

    David Carr, Time, Narrative, and History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991); Enda Duffy, The Speed Handbook: Velocity, Pleasure, Modernism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009); Mark Currie, About Time (Edinburgh University Press, 2010); Adam Barrows, The Cosmic Time of Empire: Modern Britain and World Literature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010); Ricardo J. Quinones, Map** Literary Modernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014); Randall Stevenson, Reading the Times: Temporality and History in Twentieth-Century Fiction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017).

  4. 4.

    Paul Ricœur, Temps et Récit, 3 vols., L’Ordre Philosophique (Paris: Seuil, 1983).

  5. 5.

    Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America, 35th Anniversary edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 365.

  6. 6.

    Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993).

  7. 7.

    Arthur Rimbaud, Rimbaud: Poésies—Une saison en enfer—Illuminations (Paris: Folio, 1999).

  8. 8.

    See Paul Giles, Backgazing: Reverse Time in Modernist Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830443.001.0001; Tyrus Miller, Time Images: Alternative Temporalities in Twentieth-Century Theory, Literature, and Art (Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020).

  9. 9.

    Krzysztof Pomian, L’ordre Du Temps, Bibliothèque Des Histoires (Paris: Gallimard, 1984); David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Oxford UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991); Paul Virilio, Speed and Politics, 2006 ed., (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2006); E. A. Grosz, The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004); François Hartog, Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et expériences du temps (Paris: Seuil, 2003). Also see Johannes Fabian’s seminal work on time in anthropology, Johannes Fabian, Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), and Stephen Kern, The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983); Peter Galison, Einstein’s Clocks and Poincaré’s Maps: Empires of Time (New York: W.W. Norton, 2003); Peter Osborne, The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde (London; New York: Verso, 1995).

  10. 10.

    Ricœur, Temps et Récit; Georges Poulet, Études Sur Le Temps Humain, vol. 2, Agora 43 (Paris: Presses Pocket, 1990); Gilles Deleuze, Différence et répétition, 12. éd. (Paris: Presses Univ. de France, 2011).

  11. 11.

    Martin Hägglund, Dying for Time: Proust, Woolf, Nabokov (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2012); Michael W. Clune, Writing against Time (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2013).

  12. 12.

    See Gérard Genette, Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983). Also see Levenson Michael, “The Time-Mind of the Twenties,” in The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature, Laura Marcus and Peter Nicholls, eds. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

  13. 13.

    Shannon Lee Dawdy, “Clockpunk Anthropology and the Ruins of Modernity,” Current Anthropology 51, no. 6 (December 2010): 761–93, https://doi.org/10.1086/657626.

  14. 14.

    Marcel Proust, Swann’s Way: In Search of Lost Time, ed. Christopher Prendergast, trans. Lydia Davis, (New York: Penguin, 2004), 8.

  15. 15.

    Virginia Woolf, Orlando: A Biography (Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1995), 47.

  16. 16.

    For transnational approaches initiated by the new modernist studies, see the September 2006 special issue of Modernism/modernity 13, no. 3 (2006) ‘Modernism and Transnationalisms.’

  17. 17.

    Edward W. Said, Culture and Imperialism, (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), 45.

  18. 18.

    Christopher Prendergast, ed., Debating World Literature, (London; New York: Verso, 2004), 6; Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Public Worlds, v. 1 (Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 30.

  19. 19.

    Pascale Casanova, The World Republic of Letters, trans. M. B. DeBevoise (Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 2007); Patrick Boucheron, Nicolas Delalande, and Cécile Rey, Histoire mondiale de la France, Ed. illustrée et augmentée (Paris: Seuil, 2018).

  20. 20.

    Emily Apter, Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability, (London; New York: Verso, 2013).

  21. 21.

    For a compelling collection of essays that address this question, see Anthony L. Geist and José B. Monleón, eds., Modernism and Its Margins: Reinscribing Cultural Modernity from Spain and Latin America (New York: Garland Publishing, 1999). José Monleón, ed., Modernism and Its Margins: Reinscribing Cultural Modernity from Spain and Latin America, 2133 (New York: Garland Publ., 1999).

  22. 22.

    See Laura Doyle and Laura A Winkiel, Geomodernisms: Race, Modernism, Modernity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005); Susan Stanford Friedman, Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity Across Time (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015).

  23. 23.

    Susan Stanford Friedman, “Periodizing Modernism: Postcolonial Modernities and the Space/Time Borders of Modernist Studies,” Modernism/Modernity 13, no. 3 (2006): 425–43. For a similar analysis of periodization of modernism, see Eric Hayot, “Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time,” in The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

  24. 24.

    See Sanjay Subrahmanyam, “13. Conclusion. Region, Nation, World,” 2022, https://doi.org/10.17885/HEIUP.607.C15143.

  25. 25.

    Aijaz Ahmad, “‘Show Me the Zulu Proust’: Some Thoughts on World Literture,” Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada, no. 17 (2010): 11–45.

  26. 26.

    Aamir R. Mufti, Forget English!: Orientalisms and World Literature (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016).

  27. 27.

    For an example of such study, see Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar, ed., Alternative Modernities, 2nd edition (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2001).

  28. 28.

    Simon Gikandi, Writing in Limbo: Modernism and Caribbean Literature (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992); Roberto Schwarz, Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture, ed. John Gledson (London: Verso, 1992).

  29. 29.

    For new directions in comparative modernism studies, see Charles W. Pollard, New World Modernisms: T.S. Eliot, Derek Walcott, and Kamau Brathwaite (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2004); Doyle and Winkiel, Geomodernisms; Mark A Wollaeger and Matt Eatough, The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); Douglas Mao and Rebecca L. Walkowitz, “The New Modernist Studies,” PMLA 123, no. 3 (May 1, 2008): 737–48; Jessica Berman, Modernist Commitments: Ethics, Politics, and Transnational Modernism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012); Harsha Ram, “The Scale of Global Modernisms: Imperial, National, Regional, Local,” PMLA 131, no. 5 (October 1, 2016): 1372–85, https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2016.131.5.1372; Neal Alexander, Regional Modernisms (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013); and Sjef Houppermans et al., eds., Modernism Today (Leiden: Brill, 2013).

  30. 30.

    For a compelling critique of “alternative modernities,” particularly in the context of Turkey, see Arif Dirlik, “Twin Offspring of Empire, Neoliberalism and Authoritarian Neotraditionalism: Thoughts on Susan Buck-Morss’s ‘Democracy: An Unfinished Project,’” Boundary 2 42, no. 3 (August 1, 2015): 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2919459. Also see Vivek Chibber, Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital, (London: Verso, 2012).

  31. 31.

    Peter Nicholls, Modernisms: A Literary Guide (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 1.

  32. 32.

    Nergis Ertürk, Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey, (Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

  33. 33.

    Particularly in a case of comparison between Western and non-Western literary production, the Eastern influence is commonly categorized as intertextuality while a non-Western text is characterized as mimicry. We should also keep in mind that both notions of intertextuality and mimicry assume an awareness of anteriority and therefore a false prior.

  34. 34.

    Casanova, The World Republic of Letters.

  35. 35.

    Turkey was never directly colonized by the European powers. The process of Westernization and modernization started in the early nineteenth century with the Tanzimat (Reorganization) period. Therefore, post-colonial literary criticism does not provide adequate/sufficient tools for interpretation of the heterogeneous history of Turkish modernism. See Güven Güzeldere and Sibel Irzık, Relocating the Fault Lines: Turkey Beyond the East-West Divide, Vol 102 No 2/3 Spring/Summer 2003 edition (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2003).

  36. 36.

    Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, ed. Edward W. Said, trans. Willard R. Trask, (Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013), 552.

  37. 37.

    In addition to the works mentioned in this section, see Maren Hartmann et al., Mediated Time: Perspectives on Time in a Digital Age (Springer Nature, 2019); Johan Fornäs, “The Mediatization of Third-Time Tools: Culturalizing and Historicizing Temporality,” International Journal of Communication, no. 10 (October 14, 2016): 20; and Peter Nagy, Joey Eschrich, and Ed Finn, “Time Hacking: How Technologies Mediate Time,” Information, Communication & Society 24, no. 15 (November 18, 2021): 2229–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1758743.

  38. 38.

    Bernard Stiegler, De la misère symbolique (Paris: Editions Flammarion, 2013).

  39. 39.

    Jonathan Crary, 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep,(London: Verso, 2013), 45.

  40. 40.

    Crary, 54.

  41. 41.

    Judy Wajcman, Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism, Reprint edition (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2016), 3.

  42. 42.

    Nergis Ertürk, “Modernity and Its Fallen Languages: Tanpınar’s Hasret, Benjamin’s Melancholy,” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. 123, no. 1 (2008): 41–56.

  43. 43.

    Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity, Reissue edition (New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1988).

References

  • Ahmad, Aijaz. “‘Show Me the Zulu Proust’: Some Thoughts on World Literature.” Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada, no. 17 (2010): 11–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Neal. Regional Modernisms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Public Worlds, v. 1. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, Emily. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. London; New York: Verso, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Edited by Edward W. Said. Translated by Willard R. Trask. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, Adam. The Cosmic Time of Empire: Modern Britain and World Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften. Band 5 Teil 2: Das Passagen-Werk. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann and Hermann Schweppenhäuser. 9. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. L’évolution Créatrice. Edited by Frédéric Worms. 12° édition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France - PUF, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. Matière et Mémoire : Essai Sur La Relation Du Corps à l’Esprit. 72nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. Oeuvres: essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Jessica. Modernist Commitments: Ethics, Politics, and Transnational Modernism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York, N.Y., U.S.A: Penguin Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Howard J., and Nigel Rigby. Modernism and Empire: Writing and British Coloniality 1890–1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucheron, Patrick, Nicolas Delalande, and Cécile Rey. Histoire mondiale de la France. Paris: Seuil, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, David, Laura Marcus, and Rebecca Roach, eds. Moving Modernisms: Motion, Technology, and Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, David. Time, Narrative, and History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibber, Vivek. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clune, Michael W. Writing against Time. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crary, Jonathan. 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, Mark. About Time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, Shannon Lee. “Clockpunk Anthropology and the Ruins of Modernity.” Current Anthropology 51, no. 6 (December 2010): 761–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/657626.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Différence et répétition. 12. éd. Paris: Presses Univ. de France, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, Arif. “Twin Offspring of Empire, Neoliberalism and Authoritarian Neotraditionalism: Thoughts on Susan Buck-Morss’s ‘Democracy: An Unfinished Project.’” Boundary 2 42, no. 3 (August 1, 2015): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2919459.

  • Doyle, Laura, and Laura A Winkiel. Geomodernisms: Race, Modernism, Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Enda. The Speed Handbook: Velocity, Pleasure, Modernism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertürk, Nergis. Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornäs, Johan. “The Mediatization of Third-Time Tools: Culturalizing and Historicizing Temporality.” International Journal of Communication, no. 10 (October 14, 2016): 5213-5232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Periodizing Modernism: Postcolonial Modernities and the Space/Time Borders of Modernist Studies.” Modernism/Modernity 13, no. 3 (2006): 425–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity Across Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter. Einstein’s Clocks and Poincaré’s Maps: Empires of Time. New York: W.W. Norton, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar, ed. Alternative Modernities. 2nd edition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikandi, Simon. Writing in Limbo: Modernism and Caribbean Literature. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, Paul. Backgazing: Reverse Time in Modernist Culture. Oxford ; New York, NY; Oxford University Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. A. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Irzık, Sibel, and Güven Güzeldere, eds. Relocating the Fault Lines: Turkey Beyond the East-West Divide. Spec. issue of the South Atlantic Quarterly 102.2–3 (Spring/Summer2003): 283–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägglund, Martin. Dying for Time: Proust, Woolf, Nabokov. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Maren, Elizabeth Prommer, Karin Deckner, and Stephan O. Görland, eds. Mediated Time: Perspectives on Time in a Digital Age. Springer Nature, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, François. Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Seuil, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford England; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayot, Eric. “Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegglund, Jon. World Views: Metageographies of Modernist Fiction. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, USA, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houppermans, Sjef, Peter Liebregts, Jan Baetens, and Otto Boele, eds. Modernism Today. Leiden: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. New York : Penguin Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, Saikat. Prose of the World: Modernism and the Banality of Empire. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Douglas, and Rebecca L. Walkowitz. “The New Modernist Studies.” PMLA 123, no. 3 (May 1, 2008): 737–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, John. The Modernist Novel and the Decline of Empire. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Leo. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Levenson. “The Time-Mind of the Twenties.” In The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature, edited by Laura Marcus and Peter Nicholls. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Tyrus. Time Images: Alternative Temporalities in Twentieth-Century Theory, Literature, and Art. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monleón, José, ed. Modernism and Its Margins: Reinscribing Cultural Modernity from Spain and Latin America. 2133. New York: Garland Publ., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mufti, Aamir R. Forget English!: Orientalisms and World Literature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, Peter, Joey Eschrich, and Ed Finn. “Time Hacking: How Technologies Mediate Time.” Information, Communication & Society 24, no. 15 (November 18, 2021): 2229–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1758743.

  • Nicholls, Peter. Modernisms: A Literary Guide. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Peter. The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. London; New York: Verso, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Charles W. New World Modernisms: T.S. Eliot, Derek Walcott, and Kamau Brathwaite. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomian, Krzysztof. L’ordre Du Temps. Bibliothèque Des Histoires. Paris: Gallimard, 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poulet, Georges. Études Sur Le Temps Humain. Vol. 2. Agora 43. Paris: Presses Pocket, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, Christopher, ed. Debating World Literature. London; New York: Verso, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, Marcel. Swann’s Way: In Search of Lost Time. Edited by Christopher Prendergast. Translated by Lydia Davis. New York: Penguin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, Ricardo J. Map** Literary Modernism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, Harsha. “The Scale of Global Modernisms: Imperial, National, Regional, Local.” PMLA 131, no. 5 (October 1, 2016): 1372–85. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2016.131.5.1372.

  • Ricœur, Paul. Temps et Récit. 3 vols. L’Ordre Philosophique. Paris: Seuil, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimbaud, Arthur. Rimbaud: Poésies—Une saison en enfer—Illuminations. Paris: Folio, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenquist, Rod. Modernism, the Market and the Institution of the New. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Amour, Paul K. Tense Future: Modernism, Total War, Encyclopedic Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Roberto. Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture. Edited by John Gledson. London: Verso, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Randall. Reading the Times: Temporality and History in Twentieth-Century Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, Bernard. De la misère symbolique. Paris: Editions Flammarion, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “13. Conclusion. Region, Nation, World,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.17885/HEIUP.607.C15143.

  • Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi. Beş Şehir. İstanbul: YKY, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, Paul. Speed and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walser, Robert. Der Gehülfe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, Judy. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollaeger, Mark A, and Matt Eatough. The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, Virginia. Orlando: A Biography. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nergis Ertürk, “Modernity and Its Fallen Languages: Tanpınar’s Hasret, Benjamin’s Melancholy,” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. 123, no. 1 (2008): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dolcerocca, Ö.N. (2023). Introduction: Transnational Modernism, Comparative Methodologies, and Theories of Time on the World Literary Stage. In: Comparative Modernism and Poetics of Time. New Comparisons in World Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35201-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation