Effect of Wood/Binder Ratio, Slag/Binder Ratio, and Alkaline Dosage on the Compressive Strength of Wood-Geopolymer Composites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib Symposium 2023)

Abstract

The impact of building construction on the environment is significant. Occupying large land areas (urban footprint), buildings are one of the most important consumers of resources and raw materials. They are responsible for 38% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in both developed and develo** countries. Therefore, incorporating sustainability and resilience into all aspects of urban infrastructure has become necessary.

To curb emissions, part of the answer lies in the use of construction and building materials made from recycled materials. Bio-sourced materials, like wood chips, combined with a cementitious matrix, offer an alternative to conventional materials. They are sustainable, lightweight, and have good thermal insulation. However, because of their inferior mechanical strength, they have limited use as load-bearing structural parts. Furthermore, the use of Portland cement as a binder still poses some challenges due to its high carbon footprint. This study investigates the potential of wood-geopolymer composites for better mechanical performance and environmental sustainability.

A 6x2x2x2 fractional factorial-based experimental design was used to simultaneously study the effect of slag content, wood binder ratio, and alkaline on the compressive strength of the wood-geopolymer composite. The experiments showed encouraging results for develo** ambient cured wood geopolymer composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Environment Programme. 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi: 2020

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A (2013) Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J Clean Prod 51:142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Statista Research Department. Cement: Global Production from 1990 to 2030. Dusseldorf: 2020

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amziane S, Sonebi M. Overview on Biobased Building Material made with plant aggregate. RILEM Technical Letters 2016;1:31–8. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.9

  5. Chen R, Ahmari S, Zhang L (2014) Utilization of sweet sorghum fiber to reinforce fly ash-based geopolymer. J Mater Sci 49:2548–2558. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-013-7950-0/figures/13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar MP (2001) Reducing the Environmental Impact of Concrete. Concr Int 23:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asante B, Schmidt G, Teixeira R, Krause A, Savastano Junior H (2021) Influence of wood pretreatment and fly ash particle size on the performance of geopolymer wood composite. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 79(3):597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01671-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad J, Kontoleon KJ, Majdi A, Naqash MT, Deifalla AF, Kahla N ben, et al. A comprehensive review on the ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in concrete production. Sustainability 2022;14:8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148783

  9. Thandavamoorthy TS (2015) Wood waste as coarse aggregate in the production of concrete. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Enineering 20:125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1016631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. da Gloria MYR, Vanessa Maria Andreola, Daniele Oliveira Justo dos Santos, Pepe M, Toledo Filho RD. A comprehensive approach for designing workable bio-based cementitious composites. Journal of Building Engineering 2021;34:101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101696

  11. Li M, Khelifa M, Khennane A, el Ganaoui M (2019) Structural response of cement-bonded wood composite panels as permanent formwork. Compos Struct 209:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hildebrandt J, Hagemann N, Thrän D (2017) The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in europe. Sustain Cities Soc 34:405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2017.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorge FC, Pereira C, Ferreira JMF (2004) Wood-cement composites: a review. Holz Als Roh- Und Werkstoff 62:370–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0501-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of “green concrete.” Cem Concr Res 2007;37:1590–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018

  15. EN 323. Wood-based panels - Determination of density - European Standards 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM D3501. Standard Test Methods for Wood-Based Structural Panels in Compression. The American Society for Testing and Materials 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. K Al Rim, Ledhem A, Douzane O, Dheilly RM, Queneudec M. Influence of the proportion of wood on the thermal and mechanical performances of clay-cement-wood composites. Cem Concr Compos 1999;21:269–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(99)00008-6

  18. da Gloria MYR, Romildo Filho. Influence of the wood shavings / cement ratio on the thermo- mechanical properties of lightweight wood shavings-cement based composites. 6th Amazon and Pacific Green Materials Congress and Sustainable Construction Materials LAT-RILEM Conference 2016:365–74

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarmin S, Salim N, NA Mohammad. Effects of different wood aggregates on the compressive strength of fly ash and metakaolin-based geopolymer lightweight composites. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology 2019;41:734–41

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou Y, Kamdem DP. Effect of cement/wood ratio on the properties of cement-bonded particleboard using CCA-treated wood removed from service. (Composites and Manufactured Products). For Prod J 2002;52:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karade SR, Irle M, Maher K (2003) Assessment of Wood-Cement Compatibility: A New Approach. Holzforschung 57:672–680. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2003.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saha S, Rajasekaran C (2017) Enhancement of the properties of fly ash based geopolymer paste by incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 146:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.04.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarmin SN, Welling J. Lightweight geopolymer wood composite synthesized from alkali-activated fly ash and metakaolin. J Teknol 2016;78:49–55. https://doi.org/10.11113/.v78.8734

  24. Li M, Khelifa M, el Ganaoui M (2017) Mechanical characterization of concrete containing wood shavings as aggregates. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee A, Hong Zhongli, Phillips D, Hse C. Effect of cement/wood ratios and wood storage conditions on hybridation temperature, hydration time, and compresive strength of wood-cement mixtures. Wood and Fiber Science 1987;19:262–8

    Google Scholar 

  26. Udoeyo FF, Inyang H, David ;, Young T, Oparadu EE. Potential of Wood Waste Ash as an Additive in Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2006;18:605–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:4(605)

  27. Asante B, Ye H, Nopens M, Schmidt G, Krause A (2022) Influence of wood moisture content on the hardened state properties of geopolymer wood composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 152:106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sotannde O, Oluwadare A, Adeogun P (2012) Evaluation of cement-bonded particle board produced from Afzelia Africana wood residues. J Eng Sci Technol 7:732–743

    Google Scholar 

  29. Emdad K. ZEYNAL, Moayad M.Kasim Dr. Mechanical Properties of Wood Shavings-Cement Lightweight Composites. College of Engineering, University of Mosul 2015; 23:179–86. https://doi.org/10.33899/rengj.2015.101083

  30. Wolfe RW, G**olli A (1999) Durability and strength of cement-bonded wood particle composites made from construction waste. For Prod J 49:24

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar Parashar A, Parashar R. Comparative Study of Compressive Strength of Bricks Made With Various Materials to Clay Bricks. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2012;2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmad MR, Chen B (2020) Influence of type of binder and size of plant aggregate on the hygrothermal properties of bio-concrete. Constr Build Mater 251:118981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM C90. Standard specification for loadbearing concrete masonry units. The American Society for Testing and Materials 1999

    Google Scholar 

  34. ASTM C129. Standard specification for nonloadbearing concrete masonry units. The American Society for Testing and Materials 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firesenay Zerabruk Gigar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gigar, F.Z., Khennane, A., Liow, Jl., Tekle, B.H. (2023). Effect of Wood/Binder Ratio, Slag/Binder Ratio, and Alkaline Dosage on the Compressive Strength of Wood-Geopolymer Composites. In: Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., Çavunt, Y.S. (eds) Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient. fib Symposium 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32518-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32519-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation