Apprenticeship-Type Learning in the Local: Insights from a Cooperative Weaving Practice for Design Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Developments in Design Research and Practice II (Senses 2021)

Abstract

A growing area in design research concerns learning from local practices and diversifying design’s knowledge space. By understanding and documenting how women in a village in Turkey learn the craft of weaving, this paper reformulates the relationship between the design field and the local context as learning from the local and aims to contributes to the design education field. During the summers of 2017, 2018, and 2019, fieldwork using the participant observation method was conducted in the village. The detailed account of the learning process in this local weaving practice allows us to define this learning as “apprenticeship type learning in the local.” The practice consists of a process in which the forms of learning and teaching are inseparably interwoven with socio-spatial elements. It draws together flexible learning processes where the teaching moments blur and students learn in action in a dialogical exchange through observing and making. During these interactions, the importance of considering the cooperative and social aspects of the learning arises: not only technical knowledge, but also social values and beliefs are transferred in an interdependent process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akama Y, Light A (2020) Readiness for contingency: punctuation, poise, and co-design. CoDesign 16(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akama Y, Hagen P, Whaanga-Schollum D (2019) Problematizing replicable design to practice respectful, reciprocal, and relational co-designing with indigenous people. Des. Cult 11(1):59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Altay C, Öz G (2019) Dialogic weaving: a favorable tension between design and craft. Digit Creat 30(1):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson P (2013) Blowing hot: the ethnography of craft and the craft of ethnography. Qual Inq 19(5):397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J (2016) Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J (2007) Vernacular creativity and new media, Unpublished PhD thesis. Queensland University of Technology, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Campell AD (2017) Lay designers: grassroots innovation for appropriate change. Des Issues 33(1):30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah S (2002) Reconstructing local knowledge. J Lang Identity Educ 1(4):243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AJ (2016) Design for development, ICSID and UNIDO: the anthropological turn in 1970s design. J Des Hist 29(1):43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2003) Indigenous and scientific knowledge of plant breeding: similarities, differences and implications for collaboration. In: Pottier J, Bicker A, Sillitoe P. (eds) Participating in development: approaches to indigenous knowledge. Routledge, New York, pp 206–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppens AD, Silva KG, Ruvalcaba O, Alcalá L, López A, Rogoff B (2014) Learning by observing and pitching in: benefits and processes of expanding repertoires. Human Dev 57(2–3):150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Druc I (2013) What is local? Looking at ceramic production in the Peruvian highlands and beyond. J Anthropol Res 69(4):485–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2015) Design, design development and questions of direction. Design Philos Papers 3(4):265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1983) Local knowledge: further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore N (2004) Craft and innovation. J Archit Educ 58(1):39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CM (2018) Revealing students’ ethical awareness during problem framing. Int J Art Design Educ 38(2):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan B (1989) Cosmopolitical obstetrics: some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Soc Sci Med 28(9):925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman T, Jacobs K (1990) Address AIGA Print 44(1):122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Ç (2011) Designer as enabler: a methodology of intervention for designers. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. İstanbul Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermik J (2012) Design and craft - a changing relationship at the heart of design education. In: Design education Asia conference 2012. The Hong Kong Polytechnical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen I, Hush G (2016) Utopian, molecular and sociological social design. Int J Design 10(1):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (2008) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E (2015) Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Rachel Coad (tran.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt S, Stolterman E (2012) Cultural hybridity in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahya ZN, Harmanşah R (2018) Etnografik Hikayeler: Türkiye’de Alan Araştırması Deneyimleri. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimkulrat N (2012) Hands-on intellect: integrating craft practice into design research. Int J Des 6(3):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Onafuwa D (2018) Allies and decoloniality: a review of the intersectional perspectives on design politics, and power symposium. Design Cult 10(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öz G, Timur S (2022) Issues of power and representation in/of the local context: The role of self-reflexivity and positionality in design research. Des J 26(2):252–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek V (1971) Design for the Real World. London: Thames & Hudson

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B (2014) Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: an orientation. Hum Dev 57(2–3):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan JB (2006) Inuit vernacular design as a community of practice for learning. CoDesign 2(02):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma L, Light A, Zaman T, Rodgers PA (2019) A respectful design framework incorporating indigenous knowledge in the design process. Design J 22(1):1555–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust C (2004) Design enquiry: tacit knowledge and invention in science. Des Issues 20(4):76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS (2018) The end of the cognitive empire: the coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (2008) The craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (2012) Beraber. İlker Özkürapli (Tran.) Ayrıntı Yayınları

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan NW (2011) Indigenous knowledge and respectful design: an evidence-based approach. Des Issues 27(4):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TL (2008) Decolonizing Methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. ZED Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RC, Winschiers-Theophilus H, Loi D, Kambunga AP, Muudeni Samuel M, de Paula, R (2020) Decolonising participatory design practices: towards participations otherwise. In: Proceedings of the 16th participatory design conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatlisu E, Kaya Ç (2017) The reflection of experiential knowledge into professional practice: case of industrial design education. Design J 20(sup1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall E (2013) Decolonizing design innovation: design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. In: Gunn W, Otto T, Smith RC (ed) Design anthropology: theory and practice içinde. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London, pp 232–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry J (2002) Consuming places. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Bryan-Kinns N, Sheridan JG (2020) On the role of in-situ making and evaluation in designing across cultures. CoDesign 16(3):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W (2010) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis A-M, ve Elbana E (2016) Socially engaged design: a critical discussion with reference to an Egyptian village. Design Philos Papers 14(1–2):33–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazıcı Yakın A (2019) Sunuş: Alelade şeyleri anlamak. In: Yazıcı Yakın, A, Kükrer M (eds.) Etnografi: Olağan-içi Tecrübe. Doğu Batı Yayınları, İstanbul, pp 7–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the women of the Village for their hospitality and patience in our involvement in their daily life. This paper is derived from the PhD thesis. We thank jury members Can Altay and Hümanur Bağlı for their contribution and support. Finally, we thank Aysun Akdeniz and her family for opening their homes during field visits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gizem Öz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Öz, G., Timur, Ş. (2023). Apprenticeship-Type Learning in the Local: Insights from a Cooperative Weaving Practice for Design Education. In: Duarte, E., Di Roma, A. (eds) Developments in Design Research and Practice II. Senses 2021. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32280-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32280-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32279-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32280-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation