Abstract
A growing area in design research concerns learning from local practices and diversifying design’s knowledge space. By understanding and documenting how women in a village in Turkey learn the craft of weaving, this paper reformulates the relationship between the design field and the local context as learning from the local and aims to contributes to the design education field. During the summers of 2017, 2018, and 2019, fieldwork using the participant observation method was conducted in the village. The detailed account of the learning process in this local weaving practice allows us to define this learning as “apprenticeship type learning in the local.” The practice consists of a process in which the forms of learning and teaching are inseparably interwoven with socio-spatial elements. It draws together flexible learning processes where the teaching moments blur and students learn in action in a dialogical exchange through observing and making. During these interactions, the importance of considering the cooperative and social aspects of the learning arises: not only technical knowledge, but also social values and beliefs are transferred in an interdependent process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akama Y, Light A (2020) Readiness for contingency: punctuation, poise, and co-design. CoDesign 16(1):17–28
Akama Y, Hagen P, Whaanga-Schollum D (2019) Problematizing replicable design to practice respectful, reciprocal, and relational co-designing with indigenous people. Des. Cult 11(1):59–84
Altay C, Öz G (2019) Dialogic weaving: a favorable tension between design and craft. Digit Creat 30(1):39–55
Atkinson P (2013) Blowing hot: the ethnography of craft and the craft of ethnography. Qual Inq 19(5):397–404
Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J (2016) Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other. Routledge, London
Burgess J (2007) Vernacular creativity and new media, Unpublished PhD thesis. Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Campell AD (2017) Lay designers: grassroots innovation for appropriate change. Des Issues 33(1):30–47
Canagarajah S (2002) Reconstructing local knowledge. J Lang Identity Educ 1(4):243–259
Clarke AJ (2016) Design for development, ICSID and UNIDO: the anthropological turn in 1970s design. J Des Hist 29(1):43–57
Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2003) Indigenous and scientific knowledge of plant breeding: similarities, differences and implications for collaboration. In: Pottier J, Bicker A, Sillitoe P. (eds) Participating in development: approaches to indigenous knowledge. Routledge, New York, pp 206–234
Coppens AD, Silva KG, Ruvalcaba O, Alcalá L, López A, Rogoff B (2014) Learning by observing and pitching in: benefits and processes of expanding repertoires. Human Dev 57(2–3):150–161
Druc I (2013) What is local? Looking at ceramic production in the Peruvian highlands and beyond. J Anthropol Res 69(4):485–513
Fry T (2015) Design, design development and questions of direction. Design Philos Papers 3(4):265–281
Geertz C (1983) Local knowledge: further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New York
Gore N (2004) Craft and innovation. J Archit Educ 58(1):39–44
Gray CM (2018) Revealing students’ ethical awareness during problem framing. Int J Art Design Educ 38(2):299–313
Jordan B (1989) Cosmopolitical obstetrics: some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Soc Sci Med 28(9):925–937
Kalman T, Jacobs K (1990) Address AIGA Print 44(1):122–125
Kaya Ç (2011) Designer as enabler: a methodology of intervention for designers. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. İstanbul Technical University
Kermik J (2012) Design and craft - a changing relationship at the heart of design education. In: Design education Asia conference 2012. The Hong Kong Polytechnical University
Koskinen I, Hush G (2016) Utopian, molecular and sociological social design. Int J Design 10(1):65–71
Lave J, Wenger E (2008) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Manzini E (2015) Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Rachel Coad (tran.)
Merritt S, Stolterman E (2012) Cultural hybridity in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference
Nahya ZN, Harmanşah R (2018) Etnografik Hikayeler: Türkiye’de Alan Araştırması Deneyimleri. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul
Nimkulrat N (2012) Hands-on intellect: integrating craft practice into design research. Int J Des 6(3):1–14
Onafuwa D (2018) Allies and decoloniality: a review of the intersectional perspectives on design politics, and power symposium. Design Cult 10(1):7–15
Öz G, Timur S (2022) Issues of power and representation in/of the local context: The role of self-reflexivity and positionality in design research. Des J 26(2):252–269
Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge, London
Papanek V (1971) Design for the Real World. London: Thames & Hudson
Rogoff B (2014) Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: an orientation. Hum Dev 57(2–3):69–81
Reitan JB (2006) Inuit vernacular design as a community of practice for learning. CoDesign 2(02):71–80
Reitsma L, Light A, Zaman T, Rodgers PA (2019) A respectful design framework incorporating indigenous knowledge in the design process. Design J 22(1):1555–1570
Rust C (2004) Design enquiry: tacit knowledge and invention in science. Des Issues 20(4):76–85
Santos BS (2018) The end of the cognitive empire: the coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press, Durham
Sennett R (2008) The craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven
Sennett R (2012) Beraber. İlker Özkürapli (Tran.) Ayrıntı Yayınları
Sheehan NW (2011) Indigenous knowledge and respectful design: an evidence-based approach. Des Issues 27(4):68–80
Smith TL (2008) Decolonizing Methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. ZED Books, London
Smith RC, Winschiers-Theophilus H, Loi D, Kambunga AP, Muudeni Samuel M, de Paula, R (2020) Decolonising participatory design practices: towards participations otherwise. In: Proceedings of the 16th participatory design conference
Tatlisu E, Kaya Ç (2017) The reflection of experiential knowledge into professional practice: case of industrial design education. Design J 20(sup1)
Tunstall E (2013) Decolonizing design innovation: design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. In: Gunn W, Otto T, Smith RC (ed) Design anthropology: theory and practice içinde. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London, pp 232–250
Urry J (2002) Consuming places. Routledge, London
Wang W, Bryan-Kinns N, Sheridan JG (2020) On the role of in-situ making and evaluation in designing across cultures. CoDesign 16(3):233–250
Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W (2010) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Willis A-M, ve Elbana E (2016) Socially engaged design: a critical discussion with reference to an Egyptian village. Design Philos Papers 14(1–2):33–57
Yazıcı Yakın A (2019) Sunuş: Alelade şeyleri anlamak. In: Yazıcı Yakın, A, Kükrer M (eds.) Etnografi: Olağan-içi Tecrübe. Doğu Batı Yayınları, İstanbul, pp 7–30
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the women of the Village for their hospitality and patience in our involvement in their daily life. This paper is derived from the PhD thesis. We thank jury members Can Altay and Hümanur Bağlı for their contribution and support. Finally, we thank Aysun Akdeniz and her family for opening their homes during field visits.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Öz, G., Timur, Ş. (2023). Apprenticeship-Type Learning in the Local: Insights from a Cooperative Weaving Practice for Design Education. In: Duarte, E., Di Roma, A. (eds) Developments in Design Research and Practice II. Senses 2021. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32280-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32280-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32279-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32280-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)