Gaji, a Gypsum-Earth Plaster in the Wall Painting Technology of the Church of St. Demetrios of Thessaloniki, David Gareji, Kakheti, Georgia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conservation and Restoration of Historic Mortars and Masonry Structures (HMC 2022)

Part of the book series: RILEM Bookseries ((RILEM,volume 42))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 349 Accesses

Abstract

Gaji is the Georgian name both for a gypsum-and-clay-containing soft rock found in eastern Georgia, and for the plaster traditionally derived from it. Gypsum-earth plasters have a long history of use across Caucasia, central Asia, and the Middle East. Gaji has been used in the preparation of mortars, plasters and decorative finishes, and as a support for Georgian religious and secular wall paintings together spanning the 9th – 20th centuries. Little research has been conducted into its properties, however, and within the context of wall painting conservation neither its influence on condition nor its implications for treatment have been adequately explored. Using the Church of St. Demetrios of Thessaloniki, rediscovered in 2015, at the monastic complex of David Gareji as an example, this paper explores the use of gaji plaster technology and the conservation challenges it presents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted here that “gaza”, as mentioned in documentation of the St. Petersburg Cement Plant as a component of Portland cement [7], does not refer to a gypsum-clay material, but rather to a loose clay limestone.

  2. 2.

    Three monasteries are located in present day Azerbaijan – Udabno and Chichkhituri in part and Bertubani in its entirety.

  3. 3.

    Personal communication with master craftsmen who, before gas-fired factory production became the norm, used to process gaji using traditional methods.

  4. 4.

    Environmental monitoring (RH and AT) was undertaken using U12 Hobo internal sensors and UX23 Pro V exterior sensors.

  5. 5.

    There were no visual signs of salt efflorescence or crystallisation within the painting stratigraphy. Preliminary salt (anion) analysis was performed using MQuant ion test strips on stone, stone masonry, brick, and plaster samples. Chloride was below the level of detection in all cases; sulfate was found in plasters and mortar consistent with containing calcium sulfate; nitrate was found at moderate concentrations in some plaster samples and in one stone masonry sample.

  6. 6.

    S/2015 samples derive from the clearing of the church in 2015. The interior of the church of St Demetrios Thessaloniki was found filled with earth to a height of 1.5 m above the floor. Unfortunately, while removing the soil, some original plaster fragments fell from the dado level, which were then stored by church authorities in the niches of the church.

  7. 7.

    Raw gaji samples C1 – Didostati Ltd and C2 – Ginu Ltd were collected from production plants. The plants and quarries are located very close to each other (ca. 10 km) in Garadabni municipality near villages Axal Samgori and Gamarjveba, Georgia.

  8. 8.

    Granulometric analysis was not undertaken on painted sample S07 to protect the painting surviving on the fragment nor on sample S05, due to potential interference of primary support (natural rock) within the sample.

  9. 9.

    Historic gaji plaster samples, as well as commercial gaji samples (C1 and C2) prepared as plasters by mixing with water, were hot-mounted (150–200 ℃) in adhesive (colophony resin and/or epoxy resins) and then made into thin-sections using a grinding and polishing machine. Thin-sections were examined under a polarizing microscope ‘Optika B-383POL’ (Italy). This method was adopted due to resource constrains, though we note that the high temperatures involved in preparation of thin sections may influence the hydration state of calcium sulfates within the samples; alternatives methods will be pursued in future.

  10. 10.

    The decohesive nature of these sample prevented their preparation as thin-sections with the methods available.

  11. 11.

    Chemical analysis was conducted according to USSR standard: 1. Moisture content GOST 22688–77, gravimetric analysis; 2. Crystalisation water GOST 23789–79, gravimetric analysis; 3. AIR GOST 23789–79, gravimetric analysis. 4. LOI GOST 5382–91 P.7, gravimetric analysis, 5. CaO GOST 5382–91 P.10, volumetric analysis, 6. SO3 GOST 5382–91 P.9.3, gravimetric analysis. The historic sample S07 was ground and analysed, while the commercial processed (unhydrated) gaji samples were already in powder form. The data of the given chemical analysis was used to calculate the percentage composition of gypsum, bassanite, clay content, calcite, and insoluble fraction of the samples.

  12. 12.

    For XRD analysis, the historical plaster sample was ground to a powder and the modern gaji sample was analysed in raw powder form. Analysis was performed using diffractometer with copper anode and nickel filter, U-35kV, I-20mA, scan rate 2 degree/min. λ = 1.54178 Å.

  13. 13.

    It is currently unclear whether the charcoal was a deliberate addition to the plaster or present as a consequence of the firing process, due to the accidental inclusion of natural vegetation during quarrying of the raw materials, or derived from fuel used for firing the gaji oven. In February 2020, members of the research project interviewed the director of ‘Ostatis Saxli’ Ltd. (gaji producer). According to the source, the historic firing process of gaji obtained from the quarried rock involved the construction of ‘ovens’ from the raw material. The structure contained holes into which wood fuel was placed. After the gaji was fully burnt it was crushed together with any remaining fuel or charcoal and then sieved.

  14. 14.

    For samples S05 and S07, the aleuro-pelitic structure was evident through petrographic analysis as granulometric analysis was not undertaken (see footnote 8).

  15. 15.

    The plasters made from commercial gaji powder contained unexpectedly high proportions of bassanite. The reason for this remains unclear and will be investigated in future work. This plaster was prepared one month before the thin-section preparation and so we expect the bassanite to have largely transformed into gypsum. However, it is possible that some of this gypsum (only in the modern plaster and not the historic plaster) was transformed due the high temperatures used in the thin section preparation (see footnote 9). We note that other possible sources of bassanite include “over-burned” bassanite that hydrates very slowly.

  16. 16.

    Ref. 18 identifies an organic binder in the plasters; this possibility has not been investigated at St Demetrios church. Organic additives to plasters are historically common and are worthy of future investigation.

References

  1. Aoki, S., et al. (eds.): Conservation and Painting Techniques of Wall Paintings on the Ancient Silk Road. CHS, Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4161-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Torraca, G.: Lectures on Materials Science for Architectural Conservation, pp. 38–54. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Çamurcuoglu, D., Siddall, R.: Plastering the prehistory: marl as a unique material to cover, maintain and decorate the neolithic walls of Çatalhöyük. In: Proceedings of the 4th Historic Mortars Conference HMC2016, 10th–12th October 2016, Santorini, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 482–489 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wong, L., Bicer-Simsir, B., Porter, J., Rickerby, S., El-Din, A., Sharkawi, M.: Analytical challenges in the study of New Kingdom plasters from tombs in the Valley of the Queens, Luxor, Egypt. In: Proceedings of the 4th Historic Mortars Conference HMC2016, 10th–12th October 2016, Santorini, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 67–76 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rickerby, S., Wong, L.: The technology of royal tomb decoration. In: Wilkinson, R.H., Weeks, K. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Valley of the Kings (Oxford Handbooks in Archaeology), pp. 137–152. OUP, Oxford (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wong, L., Rickerby, S., Rava, A., Sharkawi, A., Alaa El-Din, A.: Develo** approaches for conserving painted plasters in the royal tombs of the Valley of the Queens’. In: Proceedings of Terra 2012, the 11th International Conference on the Study and Conservation of Earthen Architectural Heritage, Lima, Peru, 22–27 April 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. CCP: T. 2: , 68–75. CCCP, . (Natural Resources of the Georgian SSR (1959), vol. 2: Non-metallic useful excavations, pp. 68–75. Publishing Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow) (1959). in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laue, S.: Detailed studies of gypsum plasters from the Ihrat Khana mausoleum in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. In: Proceedings of the 5th Historic Mortars Conference, Pamplona, Spain, 19–21 June 2019, pp. 248–258 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laue, S., Kleinmann, P.: Ganch as historical building material and the Kundal wall painting technique in the Mausoleum Ishrat Khana, Samarkand, Uzbekistan. In: Zhang, L., Krist, G. (eds.) Archaeology and Conservation Along the Silk Road, vol. 16, pp. 49–62. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fodde, E.: Traditonal earthen building techniques in Central Asia. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 3(2), 145–168 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cather, S.: Assessing causes and mechanisms of detrimental change to wall paintings. In: Gowing, R., Heritage, A. (eds.) Conserving the Painted Past: Develo** Approaches to Wall Painting Conservation, pp. 64–74. James & James Science Publishers Ltd., London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mikaberidze, S., Sagaradze, M., Khuskivadze, N., Hill, J.A.: Understanding gaji, a gypsum-earth plaster in Georgian Wall Paintings. In: Proceedings of International Conference Davit Gareja Multidisciplinary Study and Development Strategy, Tbilisi, pp. 71–81. Tbilisi State Academy of Arts, Tbilisi (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. : (Project service of the general plan of land use of the city of Tbilisi, Volume 1, General provisions (2017)) (2017). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noll-Minor, M.: Wandmalereien Des Höhlenklosters David Gareja in Georgien: Entwicklung Eines Konzeptes Zur Langfristigen Erhaltung. Beiträge Zur Erhaltung Von Kunst- Und Kulturgut, 1, 14–24. (Noll-Minor, M. (2003) Murals of the David Gareja Cave Monastery in Georgia: Development of a Concept for Long-Term Conservation. Contributions to the preservation of art and cultural property, 1, 14–24.) (2003). In German

    Google Scholar 

  15. Georgian Mural Paintings. http://arthistory.tsu.ge/murals/locations/georgia/. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  16. Eastmond, A.: The cult of St Davit Garejeli: patronage and iconographic change in the Gareja Desert’. In: Skhirtladze, Z. (ed.) Desert Monasticism: Gareja and the Christian East 2001, pp. 220–239 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. David Gareji Monasteries and Hermitage. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5224/. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  18. Dneprovskaya, M.B.: Medieval pigment and plaster technology in the XII-XIII Century mural paintings at David-Garedji, Georgia. In: Proceedings of Material Research Society Symposium, vol. 352, pp. 727–732 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kavsadze, M.: Mineralogical-Petrological analysis of the plasters and mortars in the historic buildings of Tbilisi. Unpublished project reports (2010–2021). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sagaradze, M.: Investigation of the Historic buildings in Tbilisi. Unpublished report (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sagaradze, M., Mikaberidze, S., Papiashvili, N., Khachidze, O.: Conservation research of Melik Azarianci Building. Unpublished report (2021). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuprashvili, N., Papiashvili, N., Sagaradze, M., Koberidze, N.: Diagnostic Study of the interior decoration at the building of Tbilisi State Academy of Arts. Unpublished report (2014). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ninoshvili, L.: The Wall Paintings Conservation of the Church of Transfiguration at the Palace Complex of Queen Darejani, ICOMOS Georgia. Unpublished report (2019). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ashkaveti Ltd., Gaji Workshop/Factory, Environmental Audit Report (2018). https://mepa.gov.ge/ge/Files/ViewFile/2251. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  25. Tumanishvili, D., Mikeladze, K., Didebulidze, M. (eds.): Georgian Christian Art, Cezanne, Tbilisi (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bulia, M.: Vita cycle of St Demetrius of Thessaloniki and his holy relics at Dodorka Monastery. In: Soltes, O.Z. (ed.) Proceedings of International Conference Davit Gareja Multidisciplinary Study and Development Strategy, Tbilisi, Georgia, pp. 95–107 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuprashvili, N., Rubashvili, A., Akhalashvili, S., Liluashvili, T.: Diagnostic study and emergency stabilizaton of wall paintings in church of St Demetrius of Thessaloniki at Dodorka Monastery. In: Soltes, O.Z. (ed.) Proceedings of International Conference Davit Gareja Multidisciplinary Study and Development Strategy, Tbilisi, Georgia, pp. 192–196 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Conservation Centre of Fine Arts Ltd and Rickerby and Shekede, The National Agency For Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia: Wall Painting Conservation at Church of St Demetrius of Thessaloniki at Dodorka Monastery. Unpublished report (2019). in Georgian

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rehabilitation of Cultural Heritage Site Infrastructure at David Gareji Monastery Complex (ER), Review of the Impact on the Environment, Regional Development project funded by the World Bank, Tbilisi, Georgia (2015). http://mdf.org.ge/?site-lang=ka&site-path=documents/&id=229. Accessed 22 Feb 2022. in Georgian

  30. Wong, L., Agnew, N. (eds.): The Conservation of Cave 85 at the Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang: Development and Implementation of a Systematic Methodology to Conserve the Cave Wall Paintings and Sculpture, pp. 232–234. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Dunhuang Academy: Mogao Grottoes, People’s Republic of China (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. He, D., et al.: Insights into the bacterial and fungal communities and microbiome that causes a microbe outbreak on ancient wall paintings in the Maijishan Grottoes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 163, 105250 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the International Education Center Alumni Association, Georgia for its support. This paper presents the early stages of a project that was curtailed due to the pandemic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua A. Hill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sagaradze, M. et al. (2023). Gaji, a Gypsum-Earth Plaster in the Wall Painting Technology of the Church of St. Demetrios of Thessaloniki, David Gareji, Kakheti, Georgia. In: Bokan Bosiljkov, V., Padovnik, A., Turk, T. (eds) Conservation and Restoration of Historic Mortars and Masonry Structures. HMC 2022. RILEM Bookseries, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31472-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31472-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31471-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31472-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation