Abstract
A currency union limits the ability of the member states to stabilise output shocks through exchange rate adjustments or resort to monetary policy interventions. Therefore, it is important to mitigate adverse output shocks which could affect consumption patterns through private or public risk-sharing channels. We study in this paper the difference between the core and periphery eurozone member countries regarding the reaction to GDP fluctuations, especially during downturns. Implementing a Capital Markets Union could play an important role in ensuring protection against output shocks through enhancing cross-border financial flows. We intend to show that since the launch of the euro, the degree of private risk-sharing has substantially increased within the euro area. Also, further capital markets integration could help reduce the effect of idiosyncratic shocks on output. Our results show that a functional Capital Markets Integration is a prerequisite for greater risk-sharing in European Monetary Union.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcidi, C., D’Imperio, P., & Thirion, G. (2017). Risk-sharing and consumption-smoothing patterns in the US and the euro area: A comprehensive comparison. CEPS Working Document 2017/04.
Asdrubali, P., Sørensen, B. E., & Yosha, O. (1996). Channels of interstate risk sharing: United States 1963–90. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 1081–1110.
Balli, F., Pericoli, F. M., & Pierucci, E. (2014). Foreign portfolio diversification and risk-sharing. Economics Letters, 125(2), 187–190.
Dufrénot, G., Gossé, J.-B., & Clerc, C. (2020). Risk sharing in Europe: New empirical evidence on the capital markets channel. Banque de France Working Paper No. 781.
Foresti, P., and Napolitano, O. (2022). Risk Sharing in the EMU: A Time-Varying Perspective. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60: 319– 336.
Kontolemis, Z., Meyermans, E., & Uregian, C. (2020). Consumption smoothing and the role of banking integration in the euro area. Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, 19(2), 7–26.
Milano, V., & Reichlin, P. (2017). Risk sharing across the US and eurozone: The role of public institutions. LUISS School of European Political Economy, Policy Brief.
Nikolov, P. (2016). Cross-border risk sharing after asymmetric shocks: Evidence from the euro area and the United States. Quarterly Report on the Euro Area. European Commission, 15(2), 7–18.
Poncela, P., Pericoli, F., Manca A.R., & Nardo, M. (2016). Risk sharing in Europe. JRC Science for Policy Report, European Commission.
Sapir, A., Véron, N., & Wolff, G. B. (2018). Making a reality of Europe’s capital markets union. Bruegel Policy Contribution 07/2018.
Valiante, D. (2016). Europe’s untapped capital market: Rethinking financial integration after the crisis. CEPS Paperback, Rowman & Littlefield International.
Valiante, D. (2018). Risk sharing and financial integration: How can the capital markets union deliver? In J. Andritzky & J. Rocholl (Eds.), Towards a more resilient euro area. CEPS-ESMT Berlin-German Council of Economic Experts (GCEE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marinescu, A.C., Popescu (Vlășceanu), A.S., Puiu, LF. (2023). Capital Markets Union and International Risk-Sharing. In: Chivu, L., De Los Ríos Carmenado, I., Andrei, J.V. (eds) Crisis after the Crisis: Economic Development in the New Normal . ESPERA 2021. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30996-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30996-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30995-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30996-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)