Abstract
Human beings’ economic activities often result in the release of pollutants into soils and underground waters. Over the years, various methods to remediate contaminated sites have been developed. With advances in nanotechnology, the use of nanomaterials for this purpose has been extensively studied as they present unique characteristics, such as high superficial areas, desirable for removing/neutralizing pollutants. In this regard, several studies have proven that different nanomaterials can be highly efficient in removing pollutants from soil and underground water via different mechanisms, such as adsorption and reduction/oxidation. However, remediation methods need to be economically feasible to be widely adopted by the public and private sectors. Given this framework, the synthesis of nanomaterials can be costly because of the high energy consumption, the use of expensive reactants and raw materials, and the generation of solid residues and wastewater that require adequate treatment and final disposal. In this sense, alternative methods of synthesis that are guided by the principles of green chemistry and that use residues as raw materials and biocompatible reactants have been developed to overcome these drawbacks. Additionally, the impacts on ecosystems and human health from the secondary pollution caused by the release of these nanomaterials into the environment should also be considered, which have been addressed by recent studies. This chapter will provide a cost–benefit analysis of the nanoremediation strategies within the context of the issues mentioned above and on the basis of research studies performed by different authors published in academic journals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbas, Q., Yousaf, B., Amina, et al. (2020). Transformation pathways and fate of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in distinct interactive environmental compartments: A review. Environment International, 138, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105646
Adeleye, A. S., Conway, J. R., Garner, K., et al. (2016). Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits, and applicability. Chemical Engineering Journal, 286, 640–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.105
Alazaiza, M. Y. D., Albahnasawi, A., Ali, G. A. M., et al. (2021). Recent advances of nanoremediation technologies for soil and groundwater remediation: A review. Water, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162186
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2008). Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927
Bardos, P., Nathanail, J., & Pope, B. (2002). General principles for remedial approach selection. Land Contamination & Reclamation, 10, 137–160. https://doi.org/10.2462/09670513.614
Bardos, P., Merly, C., Kvapil, P., & Koschitzky, H. P. (2018). Status of nanoremediation and its potential for future deployment: Risk-benefit and benchmarking appraisals. Remediation, 28, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21559
Bolade, O. P., Williams, A. B., & Benson, N. U. (2020). Green synthesis of iron-based nanomaterials for environmental remediation: A review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management, 13, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100279
Boregowda, N., Jogigowda, S. C., Bhavya, G., et al. (2022). Recent advances in nanoremediation: Carving sustainable solution to clean-up polluted agriculture soils. Environmental Pollution, 297, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118728
Brinkhoff, P. (2011). Multi-criteria analysis for assessing sustainability of remedial actions applications in contaminated land development (pp. 1–111). Chalmers University of Technology.
Brusseau, M. L. (2019). Soil and groundwater remediation. In Environmental and pollution science (pp. 329–354). Elsevier Inc..
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D. S., et al. (2019). The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework. Science of the Total Environment, 649, 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.232
Caliman, F. A., Robu, B. M., Smaranda, C., et al. (2011). Soil and groundwater cleanup: Benefits and limits of emerging technologies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13, 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0319-z
Corsi, I., Winther-Nielsen, M., Sethi, R., et al. (2018). Ecofriendly nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for environmental applications: Key issue and consensus recommendations for sustainable and ecosafe nanoremediation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 154, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.037
Del Prado-Audelo, M. L., García Kerdan, I., Escutia-Guadarrama, L., et al. (2021). Nanoremediation: Nanomaterials and nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.793765
Esposito, M. C., Corsi, I., Russo, G. L., et al. (2021). The era of nanomaterials: A safe solution or a risk for marine environmental pollution? Biomolecules, 11, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11030441
Guerra, F. D., Attia, M. F., Whitehead, D. C., & Alexis, F. (2018). Nanotechnology for environmental remediation: Materials and applications. Molecules, 23, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071760
Guerriero, C. (2019). The key steps in cost-benefit analysis of environmental health interventions. In C. Guerriero (Ed.), Cost-benefit analysis of environmental health interventions (pp. 1–19). Academic Press.
Harish, V., Ansari, M. M., Tewari, D., et al. (2022). Nanoparticle and nanostructure synthesis and controlled growth methods. Nanomaterials, 12, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183226
Hou, D., & O’Connor, D. (2020). Green and sustainable remediation: Concepts, principles, and pertaining research. Elsevier.
Hou, D., Guthrie, P., & Rigby, M. (2016). Assessing the trend in sustainable remediation: A questionnaire survey of remediation professionals in various countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.045
Hussain, A., Rehman, F., Rafeeq, H., et al. (2022). In-situ, Ex-situ, and nano-remediation strategies to treat polluted soil, water, and air – A review. Chemosphere, 289, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133252
Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2009). Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: A review of the benefits and potential risks. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 1823–1831. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900793
Kashi, B., Simpson, D., & Simón, C., et al.. (2019). Integrating ecosystem values into cost-benefit analysis: Recommendations for USAID and practitioners. United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
Kharissova, O. V., Dias, H. V. R., Kharisov, B. I., et al. (2013). The greener synthesis of nanoparticles. Trends in Biotechnology, 31, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.003
Kumar, C. M. V., Karthick, V., Kumar, V. G., et al. (2022). The impact of engineered nanomaterials on the environment: Release mechanism, toxicity, transformation, and remediation. Environmental Research, 212, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113202
Lavee, D., Ash, T., & Baniad, G. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis of soil remediation in Israeli industrial zones. Natural Resources Forum, 36, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2012.01462.x
Li, X., Yi, S., Cundy, A. B., & Chen, W. (2022). Sustainability transitions of contaminated sites: A global meta-analysis on economic effects of remediation behaviour. Land Degradation & Development, 33, 1775–1786. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4270
Machado, S., Grosso, J. P., Nouws, H. P. A., et al. (2014). Utilization of food industry wastes for the production of zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Science of the Total Environment, 496, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.058
Malakar, A., Kanel, S. R., Ray, C., et al. (2021). Nanomaterials in the environment, human exposure pathway, and health effects: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 759, 143470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143470
Marcon, L., Oliveras, J., & Puntes, V. F. (2021). In situ nanoremediation of soils and groundwaters from the nanoparticle’s standpoint: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 791, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148324
Mukhopadhyay, R., Sarkar, B., Khan, E., et al. (2022). Nanomaterials for sustainable remediation of chemical contaminants in water and soil. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52, 2611–2660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1886891
Nascimento, M. A., Cruz, J. C., Rodrigues, G. D., et al. (2018). Synthesis of polymetallic nanoparticles from spent lithium-ion batteries and application in the removal of reactive blue 4 dye. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.118
Qian, Y., Qin, C., Chen, M., & Lin, S. (2020). Ecotoxicology and environmental safety nanotechnology in soil remediation − Applications vs. implications. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 201, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110815
Rinaudo, J. D., & Aulong, S. (2014). Defining groundwater remediation objectives with cost-benefit analysis: Does it work? Water Resources Management, 28, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0483-0
Rosén, L., Back, P. E., Söderqvist, T., et al. (2015). SCORE: A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation. Science of the Total Environment, 511, 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.058
Samaddar, P., Ok, Y. S., Kim, K. H., et al. (2018). Synthesis of nanomaterials from various wastes and their new age applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1190–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.262
Santos, M., Rocha, A., De Oliveira, H., et al. (2022). Zn/ZnO heterostructures photocatalyst obtained by sustainable processes from alkaline batteries waste: Synthesis, characterization and application. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 284, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126058
Sethi, R., & Di Molfetta, A. (2019). Groundwater engineering – A technical approach to hydrogeology, contaminant transport and groundwater remediation. Springer.
Söderqvist, T., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., et al. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.024
Speight, J. G. (2020). Remediation technologies. In M. Deans (Ed.), Natural water remediation (pp. 263–303). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Tilla, I., & Blumberga, D. (2018). Qualitative indicator analysis of a sustainable remediation. Energy Procedia, 147, 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.075
Tosco, T., & Sethi, R. (2018). Human health risk assessment for nanoparticle-contaminated aquifer. Environmental Pollution, 239, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.041
Visentin, C., da Silva Trentin, A. W., Braun, A. B., & Thomé, A. (2019). Life-cycle assessment of environmental and economic impacts of nano-iron synthesis process for application in contaminated site remediation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.236
Waris, G., & Ahsan, H. (2006). Reactive oxygen species: Role in the development of cancer and various chronic conditions. Journal of Carcinogenesis, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3163-5-14
Wright, J. S. F. (2019). Alternatives to cost-benefit analysis for economic evaluation. In C. Guerriero (Ed.), Cost–benefit analysis of environmental health interventions (pp. 165–184). Academic Press.
Xu, W., Yang, T., Liu, S., et al. (2022). Insights into the synthesis, types and application of iron nanoparticles: The overlooked significance of environmental effects. Environment International, 158, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106980
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puiatti, G.A. (2023). Using Nanoremediation Strategies: Cost–Benefit Analysis. In: Policarpo Tonelli, F.M., Roy, A., Ananda Murthy, H.C. (eds) Green Nanoremediation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30558-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30558-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30557-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30558-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)