SpringerLink
Log in

Universal Design and Assistive Digital Technologies: Enhancing Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Everyday Digital Life

  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was established in 2006 with the primary mandate of promoting the participation, inclusion and non-discrimination of persons with disabilities in society. The CRPD is a developmental/rights-based instrument that seeks to empower the world’s most marginalized group, persons with disabilities. The CRPD is designed to correct the social and economic injustices faced by these individuals and as a consequence, a number of strategies have been formulated for the inclusion, participation and non-discrimination of persons with disabilities in their society. Emerging from these strategies is the use of modern technologies to facilitate the meaningful inclusion of these individuals in society on an equal basis with others. The use of assistive digital technology, buttressed by the principle of universal design is essential to this process. In this chapter, the author presents findings of a phenomenological study of universal design and digital assistive technology, with the primary aim of highlighting how they are contributing to the everyday participation, inclusion and non-discrimination of persons with disabilities in their society. An auto ethnographic approach has been integrated in the study to highlight how assistive digital technology and universal designed products have significantly aided the work of the author in his every day academic, parliamentary and philanthropic endeavours. The fundamental question to be answered is to what extent is universal design and assistive digital technology hel** the everyday participation, inclusion and non-discrimination of persons with disabilities in a digitized world? The chapter concludes with some recommendations for actions that would ensure that persons with disabilities gain greater access to technological devices that would facilitate their meaningful inclusion in society on an equal basis with others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, T., Holman Jones, S. & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. (2014). Climbing every mountain: Barriers, opportunities, and experiences of Jamaican students with disabilities in their pursuit of personal excellence. Kingston, Jamaica: Arawak publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assistive Technology Act of the United States (1998). Assistive Technology Act of 1998. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-105publ394/summary

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F.K. (2021). The concept of ableism: Challenges to deep thinking and critique. Keynote prepared for the ALTER (European Society for Disability Research) 2021 Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, N. (2007). Nothing Without Us or Nothing About Us? Disability and Society, 22(7), 791–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2018). Article 5: equality and non-discrimination. General Comments No. 6. http://www.ohchr.org.

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014). Article 9: Accessibility. General Comments No. 2. http://www.ohchr.org.

  • Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degener, T. (2017). A new human rights model of disability. in V. Della Fina, R. Cera & G. Palmisano (eds.), The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary, 41–60, Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, H. (Ed) (1995). Globalisation, communication and Caribbean identity. St. Martin’s Press, New York and Ian Randle Publishers, Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, H. (Ed.). (2012). Ringtones of opportunity: Policy, technology and access in Caribbean communications. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. (2017). Disability, human rights and public policy. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle-Geddes, A. (2015). Disability and inequality: Socioeconomic imperatives and public policy in Jamaica. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability and Society, 24(6). 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. (2018). Making computers accessible: disability rights and digital technology: Making computers accessible: disability rights and digital technology, by Elizabeth R. Petrick, Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of the United States. (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/about-idea/

  • Institute of Medicin. (2007). Seven Assistive and Mainstream Technologies for People with Disabilities. The Future of Disability in America. The national Academies Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayange, G.M. (2021). Analysis of the impact of accessible digital technologies on public libraries: A case of organizations of persons with disabilities in Botswana. Academia Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Allyn and Bacon: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafayette, P. (2018). Apple devices: The perfect tool for the blind.” In Transforming and Empowering Persons with Disabilities through Modern Technologies: A Myth or Reality, edited by F. Morris, pp. 4–9. Kingston: UWI Centre for Disability Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, J., Goldstein, D.F. & Taylor, A. (2015). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaughmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1994). Long walk to freedom: the autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskery, H. (2007). Crossing the digital divide- possibilities for influencing the private-sector business case. Information Society. 23(3). 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S.J. & Clayton, J. (2013). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability and Society. 28(5). 702–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour and Social Security. (2015). Socio-economic study of persons with disabilities in Jamaica. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour and Social Security (2014). The Disabilities Act 2014. Retrieved from https://japarliament.gov.jm/attachments/341_The%20Disabilities%20bill%202014%20No.13.pdf.

  • Morris, F. (2021). Prospects for the employment of persons with disabilities in the post-COVID-19 era in develo** countries. Disability and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1932757.

  • Morris, F. (2020). Accessible and inclusive city: Can Kingston Jamaica measure up? Disability Studies Quarterly. 40(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v40i2.6682.

  • Mosar, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication and Society. 9(3). 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, T. (2002). An introduction to politics. Jamaica: Canoe Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1983). The politics of disability. Paper Presented at Annual General Meeting of Disability Alliance April 15, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulos, C.N. (2021). Essentials of autoethnography. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000222-001.

  • Petrick, E.R. (2015). Making computers accessible: Disability rights and digital technology. Making Computers Accessible: Disability Rights and Digital Technology (pp. 1–196). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1401325

  • Rieser, R. (2008). Implementing inclusive education: A Commonwealth guide to implementing article 24 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Commonwealth Secretariat, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies. World Development Report, 1–37. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016 and http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/pubdocs/publicdoc/2016/4/123481461249337484/WDR16-BP-Bridging-the-Disability-Divide-through-Digital-Technology-RAJA.pdf.

  • The Telecommunications Amendment Act. (2012). The Telecommunications Amendment Act. Retrieved from https://www.informatica-juridica.com/ley/telecommunications-amendment-act-2012/

  • UNICEF. (2018). Report on the situational analysis of children with disabilities in Jamaica 2018. Retrieved from www.unicef.org.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca, Spain: World Conference on Special Needs Education. www.unesco.org.

  • United Nations. (2018). Disability and development report- Realizing the sustainable development goals by, for and with persons with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2018/12/UN-Flagship-Report-Disability.pdf.

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from www.un.org.

  • United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

  • Waller, L. (2018). Envisioning democracy: the role and potential of information technologies for the visually impaired. Ian Randle Publishers. Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikle, B., & Hadadian, A. (2001). Can assistive technology help us to not leave any child behind? Preventing School Failure, 47(4): 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). Disability overview (online data). Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org.

  • World Health Organization and the United Nations Children Fund. (2022). Global report on assistive technologies. Retrieved from www.who.org.

  • World Health Organization/World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability, Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica

    Floyd Morris

Authors
  1. Floyd Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana

    Hopeton S. Dunn

  2. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Massimo Ragnedda

  3. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Maria Laura Ruiu

  4. Santa Clara University, Albany, CA, USA

    Laura Robinson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morris, F. (2024). Universal Design and Assistive Digital Technologies: Enhancing Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities. In: Dunn, H.S., Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M.L., Robinson, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Everyday Digital Life . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30438-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation