Abstract
An accurate estimation of aquifer parameters is important for effective groundwater management and future scenario prediction. These parameters are mostly obtained through different time-consuming and cumbersome field pum** tests. The inverse problem is a recently developed widely accepted mathematical approach to obtain the representative optimal aquifer parameters, particularly in large heterogeneous aquifer systems. For the inverse problem solution, the simulation–optimization (SO) model approach has been effectively used. The efficiency of these SO models depends mainly on two factors like, the accuracy of the simulation model and the ability of the optimization algorithm to explore the solution space. In this study, we selected the combination of two simulation models (i.e., FEM and Meshfree method) and four optimization algorithms (i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE), a hybrid version of DE and PSO (DE-PSO) and Co-variance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES)) which resulted into the development of total eight number of SO models. These models are successfully applied to a synthetic confined aquifer problem. The obtained results showed the better performance of the Mfree-CMA-ES compared to its other counterparts like: FEM-DE, Mfree-DE, FEM-PSO, Mfree-PSO, FEM-CMA-ES and Mfree-DE-PSO in terms of convergence and a higher degree of unanimity with the known values of transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Abbaspour KC, Schulin R, van Genuchten MT (2001) Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization. Adv Water Res 24:827–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00018-5
Bayer P, Finkel M (2004) Evolutionary algorithms for the optimization of advective control of contaminated aquifer zones. Water Resour Res 40(6). http://doi.wiley.com/https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002675
Bayer P, Finkel M (2007) Optimization of concentration control by evolution strategies: formulation, application, and assessment of remedial solutions. Water Resour Res 43(2): n/a-n/a. http://doi.wiley.com/https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004753
Bayer P, Duran E, Baumann R, Finkel M (2009) Optimized groundwater drawdown in a subsiding urban mining area. J Hydrol 365(1–2):95–104. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169408005799
Carrera J, Neuman SP (1986) Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 2. uniqueness, stability, and solution algorithms. Water Resour Res 22(2):211–227
Ch S, Mathur S (2012) Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for aquifer parameter estimation. KSCE J Civ Eng 16:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1452-5
Cheng AHD, Golberg MA, Kansa EJ, Zammito G (2003) Exponential convergence and H-c multiquadric collocation method for partial differential equations. Numer Methods Part Differ Equ 19(5):571–594
Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS’95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science IEEE; 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
Hansen N (2006) The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review. In: Towards a new evolutionary computation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 75–102. http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00772
Hardy RL (1971) Multiquadric Equations of Topography and Other Irregular Surfaces. J Geophys Res 76(8):1905–1915. http://doi.wiley.com/https://doi.org/10.1029/JB076i008p01905.
Jiang Y, Liu C, Huang C, Wu X (2010) Improved particle swarm algorithm for hydrological parameter optimization. Appl Math Comput 217(7):3207–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.08.053
Kennedy J, Eberhart R (2010) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1942–1948
Lakshmi Prasad K, Rastogi AK (2001) Estimating net aquifer recharge and zonal hydraulic conductivity values for Mahi Right Bank Canal project area, India by genetic algorithm. J Hydrol 243:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00364-4
Liu GR, Gu Y (2005) An introduction to meshfree methods and their programming. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. http://springer.longhoe.net/https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3468-7.
Mahinthakumar G, Mohamed S (2005) Hybrid Genetic Algorithm—Local Search Methods for Solving Groundwater Source Identification Inverse Problems. J Water Res Planning Manag 131(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:1(45)
Michael AM (2009) Irrigation: theory and practice. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Limited
Patel S, Rastogi AK (2017) Meshfree multiquadric solution for real field large heterogeneous aquifer system. Water Resour Manage 31(9):2869–2884
Patel S, Eldho TI, Rastogi AK, Rabinovich A (2022) Groundwater parameter estimation using multiquadric-based meshfree simulation with covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy optimization for a regional aquifer system. Hydrogeol J 30(7):2205–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02544-y
Price K, Storn RM, Lampinen JA (2005) Differential Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31306-0
Rastogi AK, Cyriac R, Munuswami V (2014) PSO and DE application in groundwater hydrology. LAP Lambert, Chisinau, Moldova
Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11(4):341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
Thangarajan M (2007) 1 National geophysical research institute, Hyderabad, India. In: Thangarajan M (ed) Groundwater resource evaluation, augmentation, contamination, restoration, modeling and management. Springer, Hyderabad
The World Bank (2009) Deep wells and prudence: towards pragmatic action for addressing groundwater overexploitation in India. Washington
Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans Amer Geophys Union 16(2):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519
Thomas A, Majumdar P, Eldho TI, Rastogi AK (2018) Simulation optimization model for aquifer parameter estimation using coupled meshfree point collocation method and cat swarm optimization. Eng Anal Bound Elem 91:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.03.004
Willis R, Yeh WW-G (1987) Groundwater systems planning and management. Prentice Hall Inc., Old Tappan
Wu Y, Lee W, Chien C (2011) Modified the performance of differential evolution algorithm with dual evolution strategy. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing IACSIT press: Singa, pp 57–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patel, S., Eldho, T.I. (2023). Simulation–optimization Models for Aquifer Parameter Estimation. In: Pande, C.B., Kumar, M., Kushwaha, N.L. (eds) Surface and Groundwater Resources Development and Management in Semi-arid Region. Springer Hydrogeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29394-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29394-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29393-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29394-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)