SpringerLink
Log in

The Task of Explanation (and the Beginnings of Treatment)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Embodied, Embedded, and Enactive Psychopathology

  • 315 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores implications of 3e Psychopathology for the task of explanation. Some general comments about explanation itself are made, before exploring implications at both a research level, and at an individual/clinical level. The section on ‘explanation for researchers’ prescribes explanatory and methodological pluralism, before assessing some different ways that attempts at explanation are targeted. The Relational Analysis of Phenomena (the RAP) is then summarized as one way to develop explanatory theory in a way congruent with 3e Psychopathology. The section on ‘explanation for clinicians’ explores the role of individually tailored explanations (i.e., ‘formulations’) in clinical practice. A rough methodological taxonomy of the ways in which approaches to formulation differ is presented. It is then explored how a 3e Psychopathology orientation would influence each factor in this taxonomy. Some 3e Psychopathology inspired clinical tools are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This last example is inspired by Krueger and Colombetti (2018).

References

  • Aftab, A., & Nielsen, K. (2020). 3E approach to psychopathology: Kristopher Nielsen, PhD [Interview in Psychiatric Times]. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/three-approach-psychopathology-kristopher-nielsen-phd

  • Bechtel, W. (2009a). Explanation: Mechanism, modularity, and situated cognition. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. (2009b). Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 22(5), 543–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2020). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, H. (2013). Classification and psychopathology research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokulich, A. (2018). Representing and explaining: The eikonic conception of scientific explanation. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Cramer, A., & Kalis, A. (2018). Brain disorders? Not really… Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt, I. (2013). Explanation in biology: Reduction, pluralism, and explanatory aims. Science & Education, 22(1), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., & Eronen, M. I. (2022). Back to basics: The importance of conceptual clarification in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 340–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. (2015). Beyond diagnosis: Case formulation in cognitive behavioural therapy. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B., Craddock, N., Cuthbert, B. N., Hyman, S. E., Lee, F. S., & Ressler, K. J. (2013). DSM-5 and RDoC: Progress in psychiatry research? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(11), 810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2017). Is pluralism compatible with scientific realism? In The Routledge handbook of scientific realism (pp. 176–186). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clack, S., & Ward, T. (2020). Modeling the symptoms of psychopathology: A pluralistic approach. New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, A. A., Roley-Roberts, M. E., Lagdon, S., & Armour, C. (2017). Heterogeneity in patterns of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms: Latent profile analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 212, 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, B. N. (2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 28–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11(1), 126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013). Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, R. (2006). Integrative formulation: CAT and ANT. In Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy (pp. 199–224). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, R., & Stedmon, J. (2013). Systemic formulation: Map** the family dance. In Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy (pp. 87–115). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, S. (2020b). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D., Pratt, D. N., Giangrande, E. J., Grunnagle, M., Orel, J., Weinberger, D. R., Callicott, J. H., & Berman, K. F. (2017). Attacking heterogeneity in schizophrenia by deriving clinical subgroups from widely available symptom data. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(1), 101–113.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C., & Murphy, D. (2020). De Haan on sense-making and psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 27(1), 29–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D. (2015). Psychotherapy case formulation. American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2017). Ecology of the Brain: The phenomenology and biology of the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, K., & Jackson, M. (1997). Spiritual experience and psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 4(1), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatzer-Levy, I. R., & Bryant, R. A. (2013). 636,120 ways to have posttraumatic stress disorder. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 651–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García Otero, E. (2022). Participatory sense-making in psychotherapy, PhD, University of the Basque Country/Universidad del País Vasco. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/56213

  • Gauld, C., Nielsen, K., Manon, J., Bottemanne, H., & Dumas, G. (2022). From analytic to synthetic-organizational pluralisms: A pluralistic enactive psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.981787

  • Glennan, S., & Illari, P. (2017). The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S. (2004). Emotion–focused therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 11(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2014). Investigating the psychological world; scientific method in the behavioural sciences. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D., & Spellman, D. (2006). Social constructionist formulation: Telling a different story. In Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy (pp. 115–142). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009). ACT made simple: A quick-start guide to ACT basics and beyond. New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins-Elder, H., & Ward, T. (2020). The explanation of eating disorders: A critical analysis. Behaviour Change, 37(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins-Elder, H., & Ward, T. (2021). From competition to co-operation: Shifting the “one best model” perspective. Theory & Psychology, 31, 821–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354321995900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershenberg, R., & Goldfried, M. R. (2015). Implications of RDoC for the research and practice of psychotherapy. Behavior Therapy, 46(2), 156–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, G. A., & Zachar, P. (2017). RDoC’s metaphysical assumptions: Problems and promises. In Extraordinary science: Responding to the crisis in psychiatric research (pp. 59–86). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2015). Brain disorders? Precisely. Science, 348(6234), 499–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerotic, S., & Aftab, A. (2021). Scientific pluralism is the only way forward for psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 143(6), 537–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L. (2018). Psychological formulation as an alternative to psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 58(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L., Boyle, M., Cromby, J., Dillon, J., Harper, D., & Kinderman, P. (2018). The power threat meaning framework. British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2013). Introduction to formulation. In Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy (pp. 21–37). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. G., & Mendell, L. M. (1999). Assessing the decade of the brain. Science, 284(5415), 739–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karter, J. M., & Kamens, S. R. (2019). Toward conceptual competence in psychiatric diagnosis: An ecological model for critiques of the DSM. In Critical Psychiatry (pp. 17–69). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. (2008). Explanatory models for psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(6), 695–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. (2012b). The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: Replacing the organic–functional/hardware–software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(4), 377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. (2019). From many to one to many – The search for causes of psychiatric illness. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(10), 1085–1091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmayer, L. J., & Crafa, D. (2014). What kind of science for psychiatry? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 435.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, J., & Colombetti, G. (2018). Affective affordances and psychopathology. In Philosophical perspectives on affective experience and psychopathology: Vol. XXVIII–2 (pp. 221–247). Quodlibet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Jr., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014). Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(Suppl_4), S213–S220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leo, J., & Lacasse, J. R. (2008). The media and the chemical imbalance theory of depression. Society, 45(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 129–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Treadway, M. T. (2016). Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 435–463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C. A., Hasty, M. K., Conus, P., & Berk, M. (2012). Is diagnosis enough to guide interventions in mental health? Using case formulation in clinical practice. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malan, D., & Parker, L. (1995). Individual psychotherapy and the science of psychodynamics. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716–743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. D. (2002). Integrative pluralism. Biology and Philosophy, 17(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, S. M., & Anderson, S. F. (2015). Depression: The shroud of heterogeneity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012). Research Domain Criteria: Cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NiaNia, W., Bush, A., & Epston, D. (2016). Collaborative and indigenous mental health therapy: Tātaihono–stories of Māori healing and psychiatry. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. (2020b). What is mental disorder? Develo** an embodied, embedded, and enactive psychopathology. PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8957

  • Nielsen, K. (2022b). Same diagnosis, different problem: The challenge of heterogeneity in mental disorder. MIND Foundation. https://mind-foundation.org/same-diagnosis-different-problem-the-challenge-of-heterogeneity-in-mental-disorder/

  • Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. (2018). Towards a new conceptual framework for psychopathology: Embodiment, enactivism and embedment. Theory & Psychology, 8(6), 800–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318808394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. (2020b). Phenomena complexes as targets of explanation in psychopathology: The Relational Analysis of Phenomena (RAP) approach. Theory & Psychology, 30(2), 164–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIMH. (2022). Developmental and environmental aspects. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-funded-by-nimh/rdoc/developmental-and-environmental-aspects

  • Papaspirou, P., & Moussas, X. (2013). A brief tour into the history of gravity: From Emocritus to Einstein. American Journal of Space Science, 1(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potochnik, A. (2016). Scientific explanation: Putting communication first. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potochnik, A. (2017). Idealization and the aims of science. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radomsky, A. S., Alcolado, G. M., Abramowitz, J. S., Alonso, P., Belloch, A., Bouvard, M., Clark, D. A., Coles, M. E., Doron, G., & Fernández-Álvarez, H. (2014). Part 1 – You can run but you can’t hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Purdon, C., & Smilek, D. (2017). Intrusive thoughts: Linking spontaneous mind wandering and OCD symptomatology. Psychological Research, 81(2), 392–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. A. (2017). Coordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition. Philosophical Explorations, 20(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2017). Natural philosophy: From social brains to knowledge, reality, morality, and beauty (draft 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=OVGna4ZEpWwC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbeeken, R., & Weber, E. (2002). Dispositional explanations of behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 30, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit, W. (2020). Model pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(2), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. C. (2014b). Wittgenstein’s nightmare: Why the RDoC grid needs a conceptual dimension. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 38–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Clack, S. (2019a). From symptom to clinical phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 54, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Clack, S. (2019b). From symptoms of psychopathology to the explanation of clinical phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 54, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Clack, S., & Haig, B. D. (2016). The abductive theory of method: Scientific inquiry and clinical practice. Behaviour Change, 33(4), 212–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Vertue, F. M., & Haig, B. D. (1999). Abductive method and clinical assessment in practice. Behaviour Change, 16(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerhoff, D. (2022). Understanding gangs: Develo** an epistemically pluralist framework for gang research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2020). A pluralistic approach to the definition, classification, and explanation of gangs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2022). Epistemic pluralism and the justification of conceptual strategies in science. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire, C. E., Ward, T., & Clack, S. (2021). Symptom descriptions in psychopathology: How well are they working for us? Clinical Psychological Science, 9(3), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007). Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 557–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2017). The philosophy of nosology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 49–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Te Kura Mātai Hinengaro - School of Psychology, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Kristopher Nielsen

Authors
  1. Kristopher Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristopher Nielsen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, K. (2023). The Task of Explanation (and the Beginnings of Treatment). In: Embodied, Embedded, and Enactive Psychopathology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29164-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation