Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices are used to deliver a constant pressure in the airways throughout the entire respiratory cycle.

CPAP is not a ventilatory modality because patients are breathing spontaneously without any respiratory support.

CPAP can be administered with high flow generators or mechanical ventilators. The former is the easiest way to deliver CPAP, although they lack respiratory monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 189.89
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiumello D, Esquinas AM, Moerer O, et al. A systematic technical review of the systems for the continuous positive airway pressure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;2012(78):1385–93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher GC. The Downs’ adjustable flow generator. Anaesthesia. 1998;43:766–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Volsko TA. Devices used for CPAP delivery. Respir Care. 2019;64:723–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Templier F, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al. Mesure sur banc d’essai des FIO2 délivrées par la CPAP boussignac alimentée en oxygène pur. Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation. 2003;22:103–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brusasco C, Corradi F, De Ferrari A, et al. CPAP devices for emergency prehospital use: a bench study. Respir Care. 2015;60:1777–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiesen J, Ornstein M, Tonelli AR, et al. State of the evidence: mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with cardiogenic shock. Heart. 2013;99:1812–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1056–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naughton MT, Rahman MA, Hara K, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995;91:1725–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahmood SS, Pinsky MR. Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics. Ann Transl Med. 6(18):349. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.04.29.

  10. Luecke T, Pelosi P. Clinical review: positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Crit Care. 2005;9:607–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nava S, Hill N. Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet. 2009;374:250–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017:50. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.

  13. Ferrari G, Milan A, Groff P, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure vs. pressure support ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized trial. J Emerg Med. 2010;39:676–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faria DAS, da Silva EMK, Atallah AN, et al. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009134.pub2.

  15. Schreiber A, Yıldırım F, Ferrari G, et al. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill trauma patients: a systematic review (Kritik Travma Hastalarında Noninvaziv Mekanik Ventilasyon: Sistematik Derleme). Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018;46:88–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cosentini R, Brambilla AM, et al. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, controlled trial. Chest. 2010;138:114–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Prina E, et al. Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:942–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Rossi S. COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not? Crit Care. 2020;24. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02880-z.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amirfarzan H, Cereda MF, Gaulton TG, et al. Helmet CPAP use in COVID-19 – a practical review. Pulmonology. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.01.008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferrari, G., Rindone, E., Di Tria, R., Prota, R. (2023). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). In: Esquinas, A.M. (eds) Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28963-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28963-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28962-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28963-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation