Abstract
This chapter discusses the challenges of an epistemological pluralism. It assesses the tensions internal to the exposome as part of a longer history of epidemiology, and as opportunities to have the exposomic knowledge interact with the social sciences of health. This chapter looks specifically at the case of systemic diseases of (supposedly) “unknown causes”. Those diseases may indeed be studied as a “case”—in the meaning of “case” recommended by Passeron et Revel (2005), i.e. a door likely to open broad research avenues from an empirical narrow object and scale. From the case of systemic diseases, we examine how the bio-mechanistic approach to the causes of diseases does not exclude, on the contrary, the search for other avenues likely not only to improve the management of the patients by an interdisciplinary approach, but also to produce valuable outcomes about inequalities in health, for the own sake of the social sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
With a wink to the so-called shoe-leather epidemiology, which refers to a fieldwork intended to uncover health social determinants for populations and individuals. See for instance (Koo et Thacker 2010).
- 3.
Matching controls with patients on sex, age range and tobacco consumption criteria.
- 4.
ERC Advanced Grant project, directed by Paul-André Rosental, Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics, Sciences Po, Paris 2012–2017. Grant number ERC-2011-ADG_20110406, project ID 295,817.
References
Brown, P. (1997). Popular epidemiology revisited. Current Sociology, 45(3), 137–156.
Brown, P., Morello-Frosch, R., Zavestoski, S., & and the Contested Illnesses Research Group. (2012). Contested Illnesses. Citizens, Science, and Health Social Movements. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Cavalin, C., Catinon, M., Macchi, O., Vincent, M., Rosental, P.-A., et al. (2021). Expositions aux particules inorganiques : comment poser la question ? In Duwez Emmanuelle, Mercklé Pierre (dir.). Un panel français. L’Étude longitudinale par internet pour les sciences sociales (ELIPSS) (pp. 185–212). Paris: Éditions de l’INED.
Cavalin, C., Henry, E., Jouzel, J.-N., & Pélisse, J. (dir.). (2021). Cent ans de sous-reconnaissance des maladies professionnelles. Paris: Presses des Mines.
Cavalin, C., Lescoat, A., Sigaux, J., Macchi, O., Ballerie, A., Catinon, M., et al. (2022). Crystalline silica exposure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology, (keac675). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac675
Cooper, G. S., & Stroehla, B. C. (2003). The epidemiology of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity Reviews, (2), 119–125.
Dubois, M., Guaspare, C., & Louvel, S. (2018). De la génétique à l’épigénétique : une révolution post-génomique à l’usage des sociologues. Revue française de sociologie, 59(1), 71–98.
Fassin, D. (2003). Naissance de la santé publique. Deux descriptions de saturnisme infantile à Paris (1987-1989). Genèses, (53), 139–153.
Fleck, L. (1979) [1935]. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ghiara, V., & Russo, F. (2019). Reconstructing the mixed mechanisms of health: the role of bio- and sociomarkers. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15468755933353
Giroux, E. (2021a). L’exposome : entre globalité et précision. Bulletin d’histoire et d’épistémologie des sciences de la vie, 28(2), 119–148.
Giroux, E. (2021b). L’exposome : vers une science intégrative des expositions Lato Sensu. Revue de la société de philosphie des sciences, 8(3), 9–28.
Giroux, E., Fayet, Y., & Serviant-Fine, T. (2021). L’exposome. Tensions entre holisme et réductionnisme. Médecine/Sciences, 37, 774–778.
Joly, P.-B. (2010). On the economics of techno-scientific promises. In Akrich Madeleine, Barthe Yannick, Muniesa Fabian, Mustar Philippe (dir.). Débordements. Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon (pp. 203-221). Paris: Presses des Mines.
Juarez, P. D., Matthews-Juarez, P., Hood, D. B., Wansoo, I., Levine, R. S., Kilbourne, B. J., et al. (2014). The public health exposome: A population-based, exposure science approach to health disparities research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(12), 12866–12895.
Koo, D., & Thacker, S. B. (2010). In snow’s footsteps: Commentary on shoe-leather and applied epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(6), 737–739. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq252
Lescoat, A., Murphy, S., Chen, Y., Vann, N., Galdo, Cella, D., et al. (2022). Symptom experience of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis from the Patients’ perspective: A qualitative study. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.11.003
Lescoat, A., Roofeh, D., Townsend, W., Hughes, M., Sandler, R., Zimmermann, F., et al. (2021). Domains and outcome measures for the assessment of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a sco** review protocol. BMJ open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044765
Lescoat, A., Cavalin, C., Ehrlich, R., Cazalets, C., Ballerie, A., Belhomme, N., et al. (2019). The nosology of systemic sclerosis: how lessons from the past offer new challenges in reframing an idiopathic rheumatological disorder. The Lancet Rheumatology, 1(4), e257–e264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30038-4 / https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanrhe/PIIS2665-9913(19)30038-4.pdf
Lescoat, A., Murphy, S. L., Roofeh, D., Pauling, J. D., Hughes, M., Sandler, R., et al. (2020). Considerations for a combined index for limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis to support drug development and improve outcomes. Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397198320961967
Moore, D. F., Kramer, E., Eltaraboulsi, R., & Steen, V. D. (2019). Increased morbidity and mortality of scleroderma in African Americans compared to Non-African Americans. Athritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 71, 1154–1163.
Mukherjee, S. (2016). The Gene: An Intimate History. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Murphy, M. (2006). Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty. Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Nathan, N., Montagne, M.-E., Macchi, O., Rosental, P.-A., Chauveau, S., Jeny, F., et al. (2022). Exposure to inorganic particles in paediatric sarcoidosis: the PEDIASARC study. Thorax, 77(4), 404-407. Epub 2021 Oct. 21. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217870
Newman, K. L., & Newman, L. S. (2012). Occupational causes of sarcoidosis. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 12(2), 145–150.
Oliver, L. C., & Zarnke, A. (2021). Sarcoidosis. An occupational disease? Chest, 160(4), 1360–1367.
Parascandola, M. (2011). The epidemiologic transition and changing concepts of causation and causal inference. Revue d’histoire des sciences, 64(2), 243–262.
Passeron, J.-C., & Revel, J. (2005). Penser par cas. Raisonner à partir de singularités. In Passeron Jean-Claude, Revel Jacques (dir.). Penser par cas (pp. 9–44). Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. L. (2008). The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rappaport, S. (2011). Implications of the exposome for exposure science. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 21(1), 5–9.
Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14(1), 32–38.
Rosenberg, C. E., & Golden, J. (eds.). (1992). Framing Disease. Studies in Cultural History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Rosental, P.-A. (ed. ), Rosner, D., & Blanc, P. D. (eds. ). (2015). Special issue: From silicosis to silica hazards: An experiment in medicine, history and the social sciences. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 58(S1), 1–71.
Senier, L., Brown, P., Shostak, S., & Hanna, B. (2017). The socio-exposome: advancing exposure science and environmental justice in a postgenomic era. Environmental Sociology, 3(2), 107–121.
Susser, M. W., & Susser, E. (1996). Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 674–677.
The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Christopher P. Wild, Miller, G. W., Vermeulen, R., Dillner, J., et al. (2020, 11 February). Launch of the European Human Exposome Network. Understanding the health impacts of a lifetime of environmental exposures. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/research_and_innovation/events/presentations/ec_rtd_exposome-event-2020-presentations.pdf
Valeyre, D., Prasse, A., Nunes, H., Uzunhan, Y., Brillet, P.-Y., & Müller-Quernheim, J. (2014). Sarcoidosis. The Lancet, 383(9923), 1155–1167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60680-7. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
Vineis, P., Avendano-Pabon, M., Barros, H., Chadeau-Hyam, M., Costa, G., Dijmarescu, M., et al. (2017). The biology of inequalities in health: the LIFEPATH project. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8(4), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v8i4.448
Vineis, P., & Barouki, R. (2022). The exposome as the science of social-to-biological transitions. Environmental International, 165, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107312. Epub 2022 May 21.
Vineis, P., & Kelly-Irving, M. (2019). Biography and biological capital. European Journal of Epidemiology, 34(10), 979–982.
Wild, C. P. (2012). The exposome: from concept to utility. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr236. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cavalin, C. (2023). The Exposome and the Social Sciences: The Case of Systemic Diseases. In: Giroux, É., Merlin, F., Fayet, Y. (eds) Integrative Approaches in Environmental Health and Exposome Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28431-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28432-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)