Abstract
Fixed-wing aerial robotic technology has advanced to the point where platforms fly persistent surveillance missions far from remote operators. Likewise, complex atmospheric phenomena can be simulated in near real time with increasing levels of fidelity. Furthermore, cloud computing technology enables distributed computation on large, dynamic datasets. Combining autonomous airborne sensors with environmental models dispersed over multiple communication and computation channels enables the collection of information essential for examining the fundamental behavior of atmospheric phenomena. This chapter describes progress toward the development of an autonomous airborne scientist using the dynamic data-driven application system (DDDAS) paradigm.
The chapter describes the five components of the energy-aware DDDAS (EA-DDDAS) system: (1) dual-Doppler synthesis, (2) atmospheric models for online planning (AMOP), (3) a wind field database, (4) a lattice planner, and (5) a trajectory optimization layer (TOL). EA-DDDAS combines unmanned aircraft systems, meshed networked communication, dynamic data-driven application system techniques, a cloud computing infrastructure, numerical weather models, and onboard sensors. The chapter describes the existing DDDAS system architecture along with results from recent field deployments validating and assessing various subsystems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
NOAA, “GPRA Metrics National Yearly Trends,” 2014.
Simmons, K. M. and Sutter, D., “False Alarms, Tornado Warnings, and Tornado Casualties,” Weather, Climate, and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, oct 2009, pp. 38–53.
MacDonald, A. E., “A global profiling system for improved weather and climate prediction,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 86, 2005, pp. 1747–1764.
Weatherhead, E. and Argrow, B., CAUAS Civilian Applications of Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Priorities for the Coming Decade, Feb. 2008.
Burgess, D. W., “An Aircraft Penetration Through a Rear-Flank Downdraft: Revisiting an old case,” 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, American Meteorological Society, Savannah, GA, 2008.
“NOAA Unmanned Aerial Systems,” 2011.
Holland, G. J., Webster, P. J., Curry, J. A., Tyrell, G., Gauntlett, D., Brett, G., Becker, J., Hoag, R., and Vaglienti, W., “The Aerosonde Robotic Aircraft: A New Paradigm for Environmental Observations,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 82, No. 5, 2001, pp. 889–901.
Curry, J. A., Maslanik, J., Holland, G., and Pinto, J., “Applications of Aerosondes in the Arctic,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 85, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1855–1861.
Lin, P.-H. and Lee, C.-S., “The eyewall-penetration reconnaissance observation of typhoon Longwang (2005) with unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerosonde,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2008, pp. 15–25.
Blakeslee, R. J., Mach, D., Desch, M. D., Goldberg, R. A., Farrell, W. M., and Houser, J. G., “The Altus Cumulus Electrification Study (ACES): A UAV-based science demonstration,” 1st Technical Conf. and Workshop on Unmanned Aerospace Vehicles, Systems, Technologies, and Operations, Portsmouth, VA, 2002.
Reuder, J., Brisset, P., Jonassen, M., Müller, M., and Mayer, S., “The Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer SUMO: A new tool for atmospheric boundary layer research,” Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Vol. 18, 2009, pp. 141–147.
van den Kroonenberg, A. C., Martin, S., Beyrich, F., and Bange, J., “Spatially-Averaged Temperature Structure Parameter Over a Heterogeneous Surface Measured by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 142, No. 1, 2012, pp. 55–77.
Dias, N. L., Gonçalves, J. E., Freire, L. S., Hasegawa, T., and Malheiros, A. L., “Obtaining Potential Virtual Temperature Profiles, Entrainment Fluxes, and Spectra from Mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2012, pp. 93–111.
Bonin, T., Chilson, P., Zielke, B., and Fedorovich, E., “Observations of the Early Evening Boundary-Layer Transition Using a Small Unmanned Aerial System,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 146, No. 1, aug 2012, pp. 119–132.
Elston, J. S., Roadman, J., Stachura, M., Argrow, B., Houston, A., and Frew, E. W., “The Tempest Unmanned Aircraft System for In Situ Observations of Tornadic Supercells: Design and VORTEX2 Flight Results,” Journal of Field Robotics, Vol. 28, No. 4, July 2011, pp. 461–483.
“VORTEX 2,” 2008.
Stachura, M., Elston, J., Argrow, B., Frew, E. W., and Dixon, C., National Airspace System Integration Strategy for Nomadic Missions with Small UAS, Springer-Verlag, 2015.
Stensrud, D. J., Ming, X., Wicker, L. J., Kelleher, K. E., Foster, M. P., Schaefer, J. T., Schneider, R. S., Benjamin, S. G., Weygandt, S. S., Ferree, J. T., and Tuell, J. P., “Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system: A vision for 2020,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 90, No. 10, 2009, pp. 1487–1499.
Stensrud, D. J., Wicker, L. J., Xue, M., Dawson, D. T., Yussouf, N., Wheatley, D. M., Thompson, T. E., Snook, N. A., Smith, T. M., Schenkman, A. D., Potvin, C. K., Mansell, E. R., Lei, T., Kuhlman, K. M., Jung, Y., Jones, T. A., Gao, J., Coniglio, M. C., Brooks, H. E., and Brewster, K. A., “Progress and challenges with Warn-on-Forecast,” Atmospheric Research, Vol. 123, 2013, pp. 2–16.
Evensen, G., “Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF,” Ocean Dynamics, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2004, pp. 539–560.
Sakov, P., Evensen, G., and Bertino, L., “Asynchronous data assimilation with the EnKF,” Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2010, pp. 24–29.
Plale, B., Gannon, D., Reed, D., Graves, S., Droegemeier, K., Wilhelmson, B., and Ramamurthy, M., “Towards dynamically adaptive weather analysis and forecasting in LEAD,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3515, 2005, pp. 624–631.
Gauthreaux, S. and Diehl, R., “Discrimination of biological scatterers in polarimetric weather radar data: Opportunities and challenges,” Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2020.
Brandes, E. A., “Flow in Severe Thunderstorms Observed bu Dual-Doppler Radar,” Mon. Wea. Rev, Vol. 105, 1977, pp. 113–120.
Barnes, S. L., “A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis,” J. Appl. Meteor., Vol. 3, 1964, pp. 396–409.
Koch, S. E., DesJardins, M., and Kocin, P. J., “An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data,” J. Clim. Appl. Meteor., Vol. 22, 1983, pp. 1487–1503.
Majcen, M. P., Markowski, P., Richardson, Y., Dowell, D., and Wurman, J., “Multi-pass objective analyses of radar data,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech., Vol. 25, 2008, pp. 1845–1858.
Frew, E. W., Argrow, B., Houston, A., Weiss, C., and Elston, J., “An Energy-Aware Airborne Dynamic Data-Driven Application System for Persistent Sampling and Surveillance,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 18, Jan. 2013, pp. 2008–2017.
“MongoDB,” https://www.mongodb.com/, 2021.
Otte, M., Silva, W., and Frew, E., “Any-Time Path-Planning: Time-Varying Wind Field + Moving Obstacles,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2016.
Will Silva, E. W. F. and Shaw-Cortez, W., “Implementing Path Planning and Guidance Layers for Dynamic Soaring and Persistence Missions,” International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Denver, CO, June 2015.
Silva, W., Frew, E. W., and Shaw-cortez, W., “Implementing Path Planning and Guidance Layers for Dynamic Soaring and Persistence Missions,” ICUAS, 2015.
Silva, W. and Frew, E. W., “Experimental Assessment of Online Dynamic Soaring Optimization for Small Unmanned Aircraft,” AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego, CA, January 2016.
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Saunders, M. A., “SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization,” 2002.
Shaw-Cortez, W., Energy-Aware Path Planning with UAS for Persistent Sampling and Surveillance, Master’s thesis, University of Colorado, 2013.
Shaw-Cortez, W. and Frew, E. W., “Efficient Trajectory Development for Unmanned Aircraft System Dynamic Soaring,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 3, January 2015, pp. 519–523.
Pisasale, A. and Ahmed, N., “A novel method for extending the calibration range of five-hole probe for highly three-dimensional flows,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 13, No. 1–2, March 2002, pp. 23–30.
Houston, A. L., Laurence, R. J., Nichols, T. W., Waugh, S., Argrow, B., and Ziegler, C. L., “Intercomparison of unmanned aircraftborne and mobile mesonet atmospheric sensors,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 33, No. 8, 2016, pp. 1569–1582.
Elston, J., Nichols, T., Argrow, B., Frew, E., Lawrence, D., Cassano, J., Nigro, M., de Boer, G., Houston, A., Schueth, A., Weiss, C., Wildmann, N., and Chilson, P., “Multi-sUAS Evaluation of Techniques for Measurement of Atmospheric Properties,” International Society for Atmospheric Research using Remotely piloted Aircraft, Norman, OK, May 2015.
Brunkow, D., Bringi, V. N., Kennedy, P. C., Rutledge, S. A., Chandrasekar, V., Mueller, E. A., and Bowie, R. K., “A description of the CSU-CHILL National Radar Facility,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 17, No. 12, 2000, pp. 1596–1608.
Junyent, F., Chandrasekar, V., Bringi, V. N., Rutledge, S. A., Kennedy, P. C., Brunkow, D., George, J., and Bowie, R., “Transformation of the CSU-chill radar facility to a dual-frequency, dual-polarization Doppler system,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, No. 6, 2015, pp. 975–996.
Frew, E., Glasheen, K., Hirst, A., Bird, J., and Argrow, B., “A Dispersed Autonomy Architecture for Information-Gathering Drone Swarms,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, March 2020.
Frew, E., Argrow, B., Borenstein, S., Swenson, S., Hirst, A., Havenga, H., and Houston, A., “Field Observation of Tornadic Supercells by Multiple Autonomous Fixed-Wing Drones,” Journal of Field Robotics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2020, pp. 1077–1093.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frew, E.W., Argrow, B., Houston, A., Weiss, C. (2023). An Energy-Aware Airborne Dynamic Data-Driven Application System for Persistent Sampling and Surveillance. In: Darema, F., Blasch, E.P., Ravela, S., Aved, A.J. (eds) Handbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27985-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27986-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)